Breasts were developed and unaltered, no sign of enlarged clitoris you'd expect from testosterone use either.
It's a shame the botted downvotes don't disappear when I'm proven right. She wanted to be considered trans, it was part of her or her handler's plan.
It's been a good week for my theories.
Monday - Soros commits fully to supporting women.
Tuesday and Wednesday - Forbes conference has most of the top leftist financiers commit to pressuring for lower male hires in conjunction with Pivotal Ventures.
Thursday - Japan's LGBT law is revealed to be a distraction from something far worse that women were planning.
Friday - Audrey Hale's autopsy confirms her trans identity was solely on paper.
On to the weekend, where I won't be here. Let me know if I miss anything, I suppose.
I mean, no matter how wrong you are, you'll always claim that you were proven right.
When you claimed that Kim Potter would never be indicted, then that the charges would be dropped, then that she would only get probation, you declared victory when she got a prison sentence comparable to that of Mehrsele plus probation.
SEE! I TOLD YOU SHE'D GET PROBATION!
You were also bragging about that gang shooting that you claimed the "feds" (in the UK) staged to blame on incels, and you even called yourself Impstradamus.
So all you have to do for US to not interfere and command what happens in your country is to not have a federal government? Well why didn't you say so Tony? Could have saved numerous countries from the trouble if they knew your wisdom.
You always bring up the same things and it's so tiring.
I've been saying "watch Pivotal Ventures" for over a year, and now they've revealed their actual plan, and have AUM in excess of 100bn across all the organizations committed to their pledge. When I said to pay attention to them, Pivotal Ventures didn't even have one billion in AUM. It was just Melinda Gates' ego trip.
I said that all of the left would fall in line with women very shortly a few months ago, Soros just did, the Ford Foundation followed the day after.
I said the focus on gays is covering something up and Japan proved that is the plan.
I said the TERFs are part of a ploy to replace Trump with someone more feminist aligned. Who did Riley Gaines endorse for President?
I said this shooting's manifesto wasn't released because there's something about the official story that isn't true. I was right, she was only trans on paper. She was hiding her female identity for a reason, like Maya McKinney did a year prior.
Even you should admit that recent events have greatly strengthened my position.
Women's groups are openly talking about using capital as leverage to fire more men. The trans shooter wasn't trans. Women slipped a rape bill through while everyone was tilting at rainbow flags.
I heard from someone that women's groups are building capital to buy up property to rent out below market to women only.
Have to look into that one. Could be big. Rent restrictions were what blew apart the race debate if I remember correctly.
Your position can't be strengthened, because it's nothing but autistic screeching.
I heard from someone that women's groups are building capital to buy up property to rent out below market to women only.
I heard that too, I think it was even posted here, or somewhere else I go to, I honestly can't remember. The project was falling apart under the weight of a thousand troons demanding to be let in. It was hilarious.
You always bring up the same things and it's so tiring.
I cannot imagine why people would bring up your long record of wildly off predictions whenever you try to claim that you were right.
I said that all of the left would fall in line with women very shortly a few months ago, Soros just did, the Ford Foundation followed the day after.
???
What?
This makes no sense, besides you were claiming that the Democrats were turning on the women because they voted for drafting women.
I said the focus on gays is covering something up and Japan proved that is the plan.
As usual, you're incapable of making any sense.
I said the TERFs
The fact that you use 'trans-exclusionary' as an insult shows what a tranny you are.
are part of a ploy to replace Trump with someone more feminist aligned. Who did Riley Gaines endorse for President?
A woman endorsed someone for president, conspiracy proven.
I said this shooting's manifesto wasn't released
No kidding they're not releasing the manifesto that will prove that transgenderism was the reason for the shooting. We all knew that, and we knew that without claiming that all her victims were male as you screeched.
I'm sure everyone has a record of bad predictions if you single them out.
Bad predictions are one thing. Yours are just insane. Anyone with a brain could know that 90% wouldn't die from the vaccine, as you confidently predicted. Or that the European Central Bank would force European countries to enact mandatory vaccination. Or that people going for Pfizer would get AstraZeneca. Or any of your other INSANE claims.
You may not be a great prognosticator, but you are a great comedian.
All the people who said women's votes would turn Republican in 2022.
Married women voted more Republican than single men.
Because TINOs aren't a thing, right? Give me a fucking break.
Have you seen the men who claim to be trans and make absolutely zero effort to pass? I'm not talking 5 o'clock shadow, I mean full on beards, "pre-ops" who are never actually going to get any surgery whatsoever, but because of the house of cards that is the trans narrative it must be accepted.
Now so that for women who socially mask and conform far more than men do and you have similar cases of women who are Trans In Name Only. It's the same as lipstick lesbians, non binary pansexuals, and many other labels which don't actually mean anything but due to the social weight carried get used by those heavily involved in social circles.
But because it's a woman doing it here you go full retard yet again.
But because it's a woman doing it here you go full retard yet again.
No, going full retard would be saying a woman trying to pretend she isn't one before committing a mass shooting during International Women's History Month, with a manifesto that nobody's allowed to read, that targeted a Christian school after Roe v Wade got overturned, hasn't got feminist motives.
You must be absolutely retarded to believe the official narrative on this one. There is absolutely no fucking way.
I just find it interesting that conservative media, particularly Murdoch (read : DeSimp) media, was blasting the "fact" she was trans over every platform.
The autopsy puts that in heavy doubt, and there's not a single word from any of them.
You claimed all her victims were male.
You were as right about this as you were about that 90% vaccine death rate, or your 7 predictions about Kim Potter never being indicted.
It was a fair guess when the shooter was female.
I was the first person to doubt her trans identity, and I was right.
The next question...is this related to the explosion of undeserved support for TERFs, and if so, was that her or her handler's intent?
Whackjob.
It'd be the first time that you're right, so yeah, no.
Call me crazy, but when a woman kills someone, the first question should always be what their gender is.
You claimed with great confidence that all her victims were male, and that the motivation was 'feminism'. Often wrong, but never in doubt.
With the lack of evidence we had, and the only confirmed death being a little boy, it wasn't a hard leap to make.
"I was right because there was no evidence!"
No, I was wrong. But I was right about what I said after the dust settled, which was that her trans identity was a fake, like Maya McKinney.
"Bill Cosby is a rapist. You still don't get to call him the N-word."
Actual line on misgendering I recently heard.
It's never enough.
Best reply to that is "What is the N-word?"
Cosby was acquitted, so that makes even less sense.
It was in regards to Ezra Miller.
Who? Is that the one who allegedly "raped" a teenage feminist activist (who of course would never lie, I mean, feminists are a bastion of truth.)
Teenage feminist activists do lie, but a "non-binary" degenerate and fugitive from justice raping is a "dog bites man story".
You shouldn't believe evil people just because you hate their target.
Yet you believe that troon.
Which one?
Erza Miller has a long list he confirmed felonies and only got away with them because he's a leftist. Get off his dick
Breasts were developed and unaltered, no sign of enlarged clitoris you'd expect from testosterone use either.
It's a shame the botted downvotes don't disappear when I'm proven right. She wanted to be considered trans, it was part of her or her handler's plan.
It's been a good week for my theories.
Monday - Soros commits fully to supporting women.
Tuesday and Wednesday - Forbes conference has most of the top leftist financiers commit to pressuring for lower male hires in conjunction with Pivotal Ventures.
Thursday - Japan's LGBT law is revealed to be a distraction from something far worse that women were planning.
Friday - Audrey Hale's autopsy confirms her trans identity was solely on paper.
On to the weekend, where I won't be here. Let me know if I miss anything, I suppose.
Unfortunately, we'll never know because you'll never be right.
This whole week has done nothing but prove me right.
I mean, no matter how wrong you are, you'll always claim that you were proven right.
When you claimed that Kim Potter would never be indicted, then that the charges would be dropped, then that she would only get probation, you declared victory when she got a prison sentence comparable to that of Mehrsele plus probation.
SEE! I TOLD YOU SHE'D GET PROBATION!
You were also bragging about that gang shooting that you claimed the "feds" (in the UK) staged to blame on incels, and you even called yourself Impstradamus.
Is putting ''in the UK'' in paranthesis supposed to imply that there are no feds and psyops done in the UK?
England has no federal government...
So all you have to do for US to not interfere and command what happens in your country is to not have a federal government? Well why didn't you say so Tony? Could have saved numerous countries from the trouble if they knew your wisdom.
He's just arguing semantics. Feds would be MI5/MI6 in this case. It just means glowfucks.
It was proven that government intelligence agencies were tasked with crushing anti-lockdown sentiment by Johnson.
What else have they been told to silence?
How far are they willing to go to silence it?
I know I'm just surprised that he somehow fails to understand it and thinks feds are only limited to the USA.
To be fair, he is right. Nobody in the UK calls them Feds.
They're called spooks, if I remember correctly. Don't ask me why. Probably a movie or TV show I've never seen.
You always bring up the same things and it's so tiring.
I've been saying "watch Pivotal Ventures" for over a year, and now they've revealed their actual plan, and have AUM in excess of 100bn across all the organizations committed to their pledge. When I said to pay attention to them, Pivotal Ventures didn't even have one billion in AUM. It was just Melinda Gates' ego trip.
I said that all of the left would fall in line with women very shortly a few months ago, Soros just did, the Ford Foundation followed the day after.
I said the focus on gays is covering something up and Japan proved that is the plan.
I said the TERFs are part of a ploy to replace Trump with someone more feminist aligned. Who did Riley Gaines endorse for President?
I said this shooting's manifesto wasn't released because there's something about the official story that isn't true. I was right, she was only trans on paper. She was hiding her female identity for a reason, like Maya McKinney did a year prior.
Right. Guys, if anyone's looking for me, I'm spontaneously combusting from sheer fucking irony
Even you should admit that recent events have greatly strengthened my position.
Women's groups are openly talking about using capital as leverage to fire more men. The trans shooter wasn't trans. Women slipped a rape bill through while everyone was tilting at rainbow flags.
I heard from someone that women's groups are building capital to buy up property to rent out below market to women only.
Have to look into that one. Could be big. Rent restrictions were what blew apart the race debate if I remember correctly.
Your position can't be strengthened, because it's nothing but autistic screeching.
I heard that too, I think it was even posted here, or somewhere else I go to, I honestly can't remember. The project was falling apart under the weight of a thousand troons demanding to be let in. It was hilarious.
I cannot imagine why people would bring up your long record of wildly off predictions whenever you try to claim that you were right.
???
What?
This makes no sense, besides you were claiming that the Democrats were turning on the women because they voted for drafting women.
As usual, you're incapable of making any sense.
The fact that you use 'trans-exclusionary' as an insult shows what a tranny you are.
A woman endorsed someone for president, conspiracy proven.
No kidding they're not releasing the manifesto that will prove that transgenderism was the reason for the shooting. We all knew that, and we knew that without claiming that all her victims were male as you screeched.
I'm sure everyone has a record of bad predictions if you single them out. Here, I'll give you five.
All the people who said women's votes would turn Republican in 2022.
All the DeSimps who thought he wouldn't betray Trump and then justified it after.
The Elon cucks who have watched as the platform jumps in bed with TERFs and has the chair of a feminist organization as their new CEO.
Everyone who said Ukraine wouldn't develop into a real war, myself included.
Everyone who said Russia wouldn't institute a draft for the war in Ukraine.
Bad predictions are one thing. Yours are just insane. Anyone with a brain could know that 90% wouldn't die from the vaccine, as you confidently predicted. Or that the European Central Bank would force European countries to enact mandatory vaccination. Or that people going for Pfizer would get AstraZeneca. Or any of your other INSANE claims.
You may not be a great prognosticator, but you are a great comedian.
Married women voted more Republican than single men.
Single men STABBED THE NATION IN THE BACK!
Because TINOs aren't a thing, right? Give me a fucking break.
Have you seen the men who claim to be trans and make absolutely zero effort to pass? I'm not talking 5 o'clock shadow, I mean full on beards, "pre-ops" who are never actually going to get any surgery whatsoever, but because of the house of cards that is the trans narrative it must be accepted.
Now so that for women who socially mask and conform far more than men do and you have similar cases of women who are Trans In Name Only. It's the same as lipstick lesbians, non binary pansexuals, and many other labels which don't actually mean anything but due to the social weight carried get used by those heavily involved in social circles.
But because it's a woman doing it here you go full retard yet again.
No, going full retard would be saying a woman trying to pretend she isn't one before committing a mass shooting during International Women's History Month, with a manifesto that nobody's allowed to read, that targeted a Christian school after Roe v Wade got overturned, hasn't got feminist motives.
You must be absolutely retarded to believe the official narrative on this one. There is absolutely no fucking way.
I don't know about the handler part but she certainly was crazy and a killer.
It's the manifesto that I'd like to see, some tiny crazed woman getting BTFO doesn't interest me.
I just find it interesting that conservative media, particularly Murdoch (read : DeSimp) media, was blasting the "fact" she was trans over every platform.
The autopsy puts that in heavy doubt, and there's not a single word from any of them.
I think the current narrative is that if you think you are trans - you simply are...
Questionable conduct from mentally unstable people commences because they think that they are part of a protected class from that point...
A real ouroboros for sure Imp.