You weren't "wrong" because it turned out to be wrong. You were wrong to make baseless claims based on no evidence.
I don't object to reasonable predictions that are actually based on the evidence. What I object to are your whacked out claims that are wildly implausible even with the evidence at the time that you made them.
Like with your 90% vaccine death rate. Have you never wondered how I immediately knew that it was BS? Pro tip: it's not because I can see the future.
With the lack of evidence we had, and the only confirmed death being a little boy, it wasn't a hard leap to make.
"I was right because there was no evidence!"
No, I was wrong. But I was right about what I said after the dust settled, which was that her trans identity was a fake, like Maya McKinney.
You weren't "wrong" because it turned out to be wrong. You were wrong to make baseless claims based on no evidence.
I don't object to reasonable predictions that are actually based on the evidence. What I object to are your whacked out claims that are wildly implausible even with the evidence at the time that you made them.
Like with your 90% vaccine death rate. Have you never wondered how I immediately knew that it was BS? Pro tip: it's not because I can see the future.