You weren't "wrong" because it turned out to be wrong. You were wrong to make baseless claims based on no evidence.
I don't object to reasonable predictions that are actually based on the evidence. What I object to are your whacked out claims that are wildly implausible even with the evidence at the time that you made them.
Like with your 90% vaccine death rate. Have you never wondered how I immediately knew that it was BS? Pro tip: it's not because I can see the future.
You claimed with great confidence that all her victims were male, and that the motivation was 'feminism'. Often wrong, but never in doubt.
With the lack of evidence we had, and the only confirmed death being a little boy, it wasn't a hard leap to make.
"I was right because there was no evidence!"
No, I was wrong. But I was right about what I said after the dust settled, which was that her trans identity was a fake, like Maya McKinney.
You weren't "wrong" because it turned out to be wrong. You were wrong to make baseless claims based on no evidence.
I don't object to reasonable predictions that are actually based on the evidence. What I object to are your whacked out claims that are wildly implausible even with the evidence at the time that you made them.
Like with your 90% vaccine death rate. Have you never wondered how I immediately knew that it was BS? Pro tip: it's not because I can see the future.