Breasts were developed and unaltered, no sign of enlarged clitoris you'd expect from testosterone use either.
It's a shame the botted downvotes don't disappear when I'm proven right. She wanted to be considered trans, it was part of her or her handler's plan.
It's been a good week for my theories.
Monday - Soros commits fully to supporting women.
Tuesday and Wednesday - Forbes conference has most of the top leftist financiers commit to pressuring for lower male hires in conjunction with Pivotal Ventures.
Thursday - Japan's LGBT law is revealed to be a distraction from something far worse that women were planning.
Friday - Audrey Hale's autopsy confirms her trans identity was solely on paper.
On to the weekend, where I won't be here. Let me know if I miss anything, I suppose.
I mean, no matter how wrong you are, you'll always claim that you were proven right.
When you claimed that Kim Potter would never be indicted, then that the charges would be dropped, then that she would only get probation, you declared victory when she got a prison sentence comparable to that of Mehrsele plus probation.
SEE! I TOLD YOU SHE'D GET PROBATION!
You were also bragging about that gang shooting that you claimed the "feds" (in the UK) staged to blame on incels, and you even called yourself Impstradamus.
You always bring up the same things and it's so tiring.
I've been saying "watch Pivotal Ventures" for over a year, and now they've revealed their actual plan, and have AUM in excess of 100bn across all the organizations committed to their pledge. When I said to pay attention to them, Pivotal Ventures didn't even have one billion in AUM. It was just Melinda Gates' ego trip.
I said that all of the left would fall in line with women very shortly a few months ago, Soros just did, the Ford Foundation followed the day after.
I said the focus on gays is covering something up and Japan proved that is the plan.
I said the TERFs are part of a ploy to replace Trump with someone more feminist aligned. Who did Riley Gaines endorse for President?
I said this shooting's manifesto wasn't released because there's something about the official story that isn't true. I was right, she was only trans on paper. She was hiding her female identity for a reason, like Maya McKinney did a year prior.
Because TINOs aren't a thing, right? Give me a fucking break.
Have you seen the men who claim to be trans and make absolutely zero effort to pass? I'm not talking 5 o'clock shadow, I mean full on beards, "pre-ops" who are never actually going to get any surgery whatsoever, but because of the house of cards that is the trans narrative it must be accepted.
Now so that for women who socially mask and conform far more than men do and you have similar cases of women who are Trans In Name Only. It's the same as lipstick lesbians, non binary pansexuals, and many other labels which don't actually mean anything but due to the social weight carried get used by those heavily involved in social circles.
But because it's a woman doing it here you go full retard yet again.
But because it's a woman doing it here you go full retard yet again.
No, going full retard would be saying a woman trying to pretend she isn't one before committing a mass shooting during International Women's History Month, with a manifesto that nobody's allowed to read, that targeted a Christian school after Roe v Wade got overturned, hasn't got feminist motives.
You must be absolutely retarded to believe the official narrative on this one. There is absolutely no fucking way.
I just find it interesting that conservative media, particularly Murdoch (read : DeSimp) media, was blasting the "fact" she was trans over every platform.
The autopsy puts that in heavy doubt, and there's not a single word from any of them.
Breasts were developed and unaltered, no sign of enlarged clitoris you'd expect from testosterone use either.
It's a shame the botted downvotes don't disappear when I'm proven right. She wanted to be considered trans, it was part of her or her handler's plan.
It's been a good week for my theories.
Monday - Soros commits fully to supporting women.
Tuesday and Wednesday - Forbes conference has most of the top leftist financiers commit to pressuring for lower male hires in conjunction with Pivotal Ventures.
Thursday - Japan's LGBT law is revealed to be a distraction from something far worse that women were planning.
Friday - Audrey Hale's autopsy confirms her trans identity was solely on paper.
On to the weekend, where I won't be here. Let me know if I miss anything, I suppose.
Unfortunately, we'll never know because you'll never be right.
This whole week has done nothing but prove me right.
I mean, no matter how wrong you are, you'll always claim that you were proven right.
When you claimed that Kim Potter would never be indicted, then that the charges would be dropped, then that she would only get probation, you declared victory when she got a prison sentence comparable to that of Mehrsele plus probation.
SEE! I TOLD YOU SHE'D GET PROBATION!
You were also bragging about that gang shooting that you claimed the "feds" (in the UK) staged to blame on incels, and you even called yourself Impstradamus.
Is putting ''in the UK'' in paranthesis supposed to imply that there are no feds and psyops done in the UK?
You always bring up the same things and it's so tiring.
I've been saying "watch Pivotal Ventures" for over a year, and now they've revealed their actual plan, and have AUM in excess of 100bn across all the organizations committed to their pledge. When I said to pay attention to them, Pivotal Ventures didn't even have one billion in AUM. It was just Melinda Gates' ego trip.
I said that all of the left would fall in line with women very shortly a few months ago, Soros just did, the Ford Foundation followed the day after.
I said the focus on gays is covering something up and Japan proved that is the plan.
I said the TERFs are part of a ploy to replace Trump with someone more feminist aligned. Who did Riley Gaines endorse for President?
I said this shooting's manifesto wasn't released because there's something about the official story that isn't true. I was right, she was only trans on paper. She was hiding her female identity for a reason, like Maya McKinney did a year prior.
Because TINOs aren't a thing, right? Give me a fucking break.
Have you seen the men who claim to be trans and make absolutely zero effort to pass? I'm not talking 5 o'clock shadow, I mean full on beards, "pre-ops" who are never actually going to get any surgery whatsoever, but because of the house of cards that is the trans narrative it must be accepted.
Now so that for women who socially mask and conform far more than men do and you have similar cases of women who are Trans In Name Only. It's the same as lipstick lesbians, non binary pansexuals, and many other labels which don't actually mean anything but due to the social weight carried get used by those heavily involved in social circles.
But because it's a woman doing it here you go full retard yet again.
No, going full retard would be saying a woman trying to pretend she isn't one before committing a mass shooting during International Women's History Month, with a manifesto that nobody's allowed to read, that targeted a Christian school after Roe v Wade got overturned, hasn't got feminist motives.
You must be absolutely retarded to believe the official narrative on this one. There is absolutely no fucking way.
I don't know about the handler part but she certainly was crazy and a killer.
It's the manifesto that I'd like to see, some tiny crazed woman getting BTFO doesn't interest me.
I just find it interesting that conservative media, particularly Murdoch (read : DeSimp) media, was blasting the "fact" she was trans over every platform.
The autopsy puts that in heavy doubt, and there's not a single word from any of them.
I think the current narrative is that if you think you are trans - you simply are...
Questionable conduct from mentally unstable people commences because they think that they are part of a protected class from that point...
A real ouroboros for sure Imp.