How convenient that they were able to charge Trump based on a law that was passed late last year... Almost as if the law was passed specifically for Trump.
Wasn't this woman's case flimsier than a house of cards in the first place, with her allegations only coming out in order to promote her book?
Trump needs to get better lawyers, because the Jury was clearly stacked against him.
Trump needs to get better lawyers, because the Jury was clearly stacked against him.
Good luck getting a jury that isn't stacked against a Republican in New York's hellhole of a judicial system. Shit, good luck getting a judge that isn't stacked against him. You know that the clown running this show trial was taking orders from the bitch's lawyers. It's shame that Trump doesn't dispose of his enemies the way Killary does.
What I was thinking. I know it’s a civil case but it’s crazy that a flimsy accusation from years back can hold up. Plus in New York I’m not sure he can get a fair jury
She even had her friend testify that she called her and told her about it, but neither could provide a date over a period of years… there was no actual evidence of them even being in the department store at the same time ever. There was no defensive wounds, nothing. It was being found guilty simply by accusation.
How convenient that they were able to charge Trump based on a law that was passed late last year...
But Alec Baldwin can kill a woman, and they legally act like he didn't have a gun, because that particular law went into effect after he killed her. It's like there's (at least) two different sets of rules, depending on if you're for or against the regime.
How convenient that they were able to charge Trump based on a law that was passed late last year... Almost as if the law was passed specifically for Trump. Wasn't this woman's case flimsier than a house of cards in the first place, with her allegations only coming out in order to promote her book? Trump needs to get better lawyers, because the Jury was clearly stacked against him.
Good luck getting a jury that isn't stacked against a Republican in New York's hellhole of a judicial system. Shit, good luck getting a judge that isn't stacked against him. You know that the clown running this show trial was taking orders from the bitch's lawyers. It's shame that Trump doesn't dispose of his enemies the way Killary does.
Lawl.. even kevin spacey had like 3 witnesses died from mysterious accident.
What I was thinking. I know it’s a civil case but it’s crazy that a flimsy accusation from years back can hold up. Plus in New York I’m not sure he can get a fair jury
She even had her friend testify that she called her and told her about it, but neither could provide a date over a period of years… there was no actual evidence of them even being in the department store at the same time ever. There was no defensive wounds, nothing. It was being found guilty simply by accusation.
That is scary. I’m sure no shady women will see this and “suddenly remember” they were harassed
Just you wait, a bunch of women are gonna come out for an easy massive payday in New York.
This is truly bizarre. I know it's big news today, but I haven't seen anybody explain it better than you just did.
But Alec Baldwin can kill a woman, and they legally act like he didn't have a gun, because that particular law went into effect after he killed her. It's like there's (at least) two different sets of rules, depending on if you're for or against the regime.
What law? I haven't heard.