He’s not wrong. Let’s look at this another way. Our country is divided. It’s divided racially, but most of all it’s divided between the two sexes. Women are the ones that are approving of everything. So approving that it’s changing our men into women. Because it’s way too beneficial to be a woman. What better way to get more people to affirm your shitty decisions than to get men to become enabling women?
That also leads to the racial divide in this country. Yeah, Obama is the one that jump started it, but it’s women’s shitty decisions in lawmaking that does it. Because they want to be seen as caring. So they go lenient on crime, other women lawmakers and trannies affirm that decision, crimes are committed, and then they think the poor blacks are being harassed so they decriminalize more. Rinse and repeat.
The 19th amendment was perhaps the biggest disaster for this country in the long term other than the federal reserve. Who knows what this country could have been like if that hadn't passed? We might not have had FDR, or Johnson, or Carter, or Obama. Think of how much damage we could have avoided just because of that.
Narcissistic sympathy. This is the crux of modern women. This is why we pretend women have empathy, “emotional intelligence”, and every other buzzword that is a guise for women to make themselves feel special for constantly being weak. Rationality is a burden to a narcissistic sympath as they will always have another woman to tell her how wonderful she is and how it’s not her fault.
I reached this same conclusion. Self described "empaths" aren't more empathetic, they're more sympathetic.
Empathy as emotional simulation - feeling the emotions of another human.
Sympathy as pity - feeling your own emotions in relation to another subject.
One clear sign is that you can't have empathy with groups, you can only have sympathy for them, and 99% of the time when someone is telling about how empathetic they are it's about some group.
Empathy isn't selectively felt, it's a blanket. It can be selectively repressed though, through ideology. A mark of ideologues is selective empathy, which ironically is another trait that all "empaths" seem to share, the strange absence of empathy for the out group.
The Empathetic Ones don't mirror another's internal state. In fact, ask them to empathize with something positive, like a man who just won a tennis match, and they're completely unable. Their read of others is almost always wrong.
Instead they project unto others the misery they're addicted to feeling, and then indulge in ascetic suffering fantasies. They're negative emotion addicts. Overactive sympathy is a narcissistic trait.
Women have always been this way. The only thing holding back their avarice, greed and sense of entitlement were the material constraints of the societies they lived in. A post-scarcity society like ours has no such constraints, and so there is absolutely nothing preventing even the laziest, ugliest, most repugnant cuntbag from expecting and demanding the right to live like a Kardashian.
The real question is, what will happen when the good times inevitably come to an end? When our economies collapse and we are no longer insulated from the realities of material scarcity, will women be able to adapt to once again not being able to have everything they want when they want it with minimal effort, or has that ship permanently sailed?
When our economies collapse and we are no longer insulated from the realities of material scarcity, will women be able to adapt to once again not being able to have everything they want when they want it with minimal effort, or has that ship permanently sailed?
Even after a collapse, they will struggle to learn how to become humble and how to become less entitled.
I doubt that the generations of women which are full of narcissistic vapid sociopaths can successfully adapt to a changing society after they have told throughout their lives that they are special and deserve it all.
The average basic bitch is likely not surviving a week in a potential post full collapse world.
Modern western society has fully unleashed a woman's innate desire for hypergamy and that destructive female hypergamy has further destroyed western society.
You might actually enjoy this podcast since it is generally how two men call out female hypocrisy, female entitlement and western society's coddling of women.
Rollo Tomassi and Chateau Heartiste are the big manosphere guys I know about. They both definitely know their shit. I haven't seen much of Rian Stone so I will check him out.
I feel the same as you when it comes to women just with some different hobbies. I still exercise to stay healthy but I do it as self maintenance not for enjoyment.
I rather read an interesting book, watch an anime or play a video game then jump through so many hoops to deal with a basic bitch.
He’s not wrong. Let’s look at this another way. Our country is divided. It’s divided racially, but most of all it’s divided between the two sexes. Women are the ones that are approving of everything. So approving that it’s changing our men into women. Because it’s way too beneficial to be a woman. What better way to get more people to affirm your shitty decisions than to get men to become enabling women?
That also leads to the racial divide in this country. Yeah, Obama is the one that jump started it, but it’s women’s shitty decisions in lawmaking that does it. Because they want to be seen as caring. So they go lenient on crime, other women lawmakers and trannies affirm that decision, crimes are committed, and then they think the poor blacks are being harassed so they decriminalize more. Rinse and repeat.
The 19th amendment was perhaps the biggest disaster for this country in the long term other than the federal reserve. Who knows what this country could have been like if that hadn't passed? We might not have had FDR, or Johnson, or Carter, or Obama. Think of how much damage we could have avoided just because of that.
Narcissistic sympathy. This is the crux of modern women. This is why we pretend women have empathy, “emotional intelligence”, and every other buzzword that is a guise for women to make themselves feel special for constantly being weak. Rationality is a burden to a narcissistic sympath as they will always have another woman to tell her how wonderful she is and how it’s not her fault.
I reached this same conclusion. Self described "empaths" aren't more empathetic, they're more sympathetic.
Empathy as emotional simulation - feeling the emotions of another human.
Sympathy as pity - feeling your own emotions in relation to another subject.
One clear sign is that you can't have empathy with groups, you can only have sympathy for them, and 99% of the time when someone is telling about how empathetic they are it's about some group.
Empathy isn't selectively felt, it's a blanket. It can be selectively repressed though, through ideology. A mark of ideologues is selective empathy, which ironically is another trait that all "empaths" seem to share, the strange absence of empathy for the out group.
The Empathetic Ones don't mirror another's internal state. In fact, ask them to empathize with something positive, like a man who just won a tennis match, and they're completely unable. Their read of others is almost always wrong.
Instead they project unto others the misery they're addicted to feeling, and then indulge in ascetic suffering fantasies. They're negative emotion addicts. Overactive sympathy is a narcissistic trait.
Women have always been this way. The only thing holding back their avarice, greed and sense of entitlement were the material constraints of the societies they lived in. A post-scarcity society like ours has no such constraints, and so there is absolutely nothing preventing even the laziest, ugliest, most repugnant cuntbag from expecting and demanding the right to live like a Kardashian.
The real question is, what will happen when the good times inevitably come to an end? When our economies collapse and we are no longer insulated from the realities of material scarcity, will women be able to adapt to once again not being able to have everything they want when they want it with minimal effort, or has that ship permanently sailed?
I've got some bad news for you.
They'll demand more gibs and communism.
That ship has permanently sailed.
Even after a collapse, they will struggle to learn how to become humble and how to become less entitled.
I doubt that the generations of women which are full of narcissistic vapid sociopaths can successfully adapt to a changing society after they have told throughout their lives that they are special and deserve it all.
The average basic bitch is likely not surviving a week in a potential post full collapse world.
Well, not surviving as a free person. As a sex slave for the local warlord, maybe. I look forward to the new Mad Max LARP.
He and Andrew Tate used to do huge podcasts.
No, women destroyed society.
Porque no los dos? It's a mutual death spiral.
It is a nightmarish feedback loop at this point.
Modern western society has fully unleashed a woman's innate desire for hypergamy and that destructive female hypergamy has further destroyed western society.
You might actually enjoy this podcast since it is generally how two men call out female hypocrisy, female entitlement and western society's coddling of women.
Rollo Tomassi and Chateau Heartiste are the big manosphere guys I know about. They both definitely know their shit. I haven't seen much of Rian Stone so I will check him out.
I feel the same as you when it comes to women just with some different hobbies. I still exercise to stay healthy but I do it as self maintenance not for enjoyment.
I rather read an interesting book, watch an anime or play a video game then jump through so many hoops to deal with a basic bitch.