What's next, is the mayor of London going to indict Donald Trump? Because apparently the bongs don't know what the word "jurisdiction" means.
By that standard, you can't indict Assange. Nor the Russians who were arrested in Argentina for internet piracy.
Your whataboutism game is weak.
"Whataboutism" is the word they fed to the world's dumbest people to bar inquiry into whether they and their side abide by the standards they impose on others:GG
You're not among the world's dumbest people, but you pretend to not understand some stuff that you do.
The local jurisdictions he gets arrested in have to consent to US jurisdiction and turn him over. The UK regulator didn't ask the US permission to step in and regulate US businesses.
What a weak excuse. As if those local jurisdictions are in any way independent. Sweden and the UK are vassals. And by your standard, if Garland agrees to extradite Trump, the UK could indict him in London.
So the way extradition works, I'll say again, is the arresting country has to consent. Canada arrested that top CCP lady from huawei or something and then never actually extradited her.
Whataboutism
It's commie 101 and it gets tiresome to deal with. It's obviously bad faith & propagandistic. I don't care if you call the US a hypocrite. Stop trying to change the subject with commie tactics. My point about UK jurisdiction stands. "but muh USA bad". We get it. We don't care. I can't have a conversation with you anymore bc of shit like this.
Glenn Greenwald can be a real dumb faggot sometimes. Just because he believes in free speech doesn't give him a pass on being a libtard on lots of other things.
And by your standard, if Garland agrees to extradite Trump, the UK could indict him in London.
It wouldn't be up to Garland, it would be up to Garland + the President + a district court judge + the court of appeals + the supreme court. If ALL of them agreed to extradite Trump, then yes, that's what would happen.
By that standard, you can't indict Assange. Nor the Russians who were arrested in Argentina for internet piracy.
"Whataboutism" is the word they fed to the world's dumbest people to bar inquiry into whether they and their side abide by the standards they impose on others: GG
You're not among the world's dumbest people, but you pretend to not understand some stuff that you do.
What a weak excuse. As if those local jurisdictions are in any way independent. Sweden and the UK are vassals. And by your standard, if Garland agrees to extradite Trump, the UK could indict him in London.
So the way extradition works, I'll say again, is the arresting country has to consent. Canada arrested that top CCP lady from huawei or something and then never actually extradited her.
It's commie 101 and it gets tiresome to deal with. It's obviously bad faith & propagandistic. I don't care if you call the US a hypocrite. Stop trying to change the subject with commie tactics. My point about UK jurisdiction stands. "but muh USA bad". We get it. We don't care. I can't have a conversation with you anymore bc of shit like this.
Glenn Greenwald can be a real dumb faggot sometimes. Just because he believes in free speech doesn't give him a pass on being a libtard on lots of other things.
It wouldn't be up to Garland, it would be up to Garland + the President + a district court judge + the court of appeals + the supreme court. If ALL of them agreed to extradite Trump, then yes, that's what would happen.