Scott Ritter permanently banned off twitter for the third time
(www.scottritterextra.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Elon's a fraud, but people love him because he put "69% Government Funded Media" on the CBC's twitter profile (haha 69).
If you wonder why some of us are hopelessly black-pilled, look no further to how Elon is still worshiped by the so-called "right."
Then he cucked and took all of the labels off again with the Blue Checkmark stripping like a day later.
The twice arrested once convicted pedophile Scott Ritter, or some other one?
The guy convicted after USG officials allegedly promised him they would destroy him for objecting to wars.
Is it true? I don't know. I don't put anything past the regime, and he's not being banned for those alleged offenses anyway. He's being banned because he dissents from orthodoxy.
He confessed to everything, was first arrested in 2001 (8 years earlier), and also the UN is famously infested with globetrotting pedophiles.
Eight years earlier than what?
2001 is years after he led inspections in Iraq and was a thorn in the side of the USG.
Like I said, I don't know the truth here, for all I know he's guilty. But I don't put anything beyond the USG - which, if you recall, protected Jeffrey Epstein for years.
June 2001. The second arrest was in 2009 when he masturbated to the cop pretending to be a child on the internet.
He's been at job only until 1998, when Iraq kicked him out, and when he's been hysterizing over how Iraq can rearm itself with WMDs and Scud missiles at will within few months, and resigned because America wouldn't threat Iraq with attack over him being kicked out, because he was such a super-hawk warmonger:
https://web.archive.org/web/19990203191703/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec98/ritter_8-31.html
He's also, of course, very much for the war in Ukraine today. Which he thought Russia would win easily, and immediately, because he's a retarded pedophile: https://i.redd.it/6lwnnrs0w51a1.png (even NATO is now expanded already).
Yes, the same kiddie lover. And right on cue, Tony swoops in for the defense of a pervert.
Elon, as with most people who promote free speech, just believe in free speech for speech they believe in.
His management of the banhammer can be arbitrary. You can't have free speech with bans. You can't have commercially lucrative speech without pervasive censorship, something that I think Twitter is experiencing. I think Twitter will continue to engage in pervasive censorship in order to remain marketable.
Banning is lame in almost any circumstance. I really don't get how that became an acceptable moderation tactic. It might make sense (like a chat room) where you want to gatekeep, but not on the entirety of an open platform. Back in the day most IRC servers would not ban someone for anything they said in a channel. What do the admins care what people are saying?
There are a few times where you have to ban an account. If they are an obvious bot, abusing the service, spamming repeatedly, or their posts are legitimately damaging to the host company (i.e. threat of lawsuits) but otherwise just moderate and curate the content.
Yeah I differentiate spam prevention and genuine censorship. How you accomplish the former is more of a formality. And then you have viewpoint based bans. I believe you have to have those to be advertiser friendly. You have to ban the people that are widely derided and only liked by a niche. You have to do the whack a mole thing with rules violators.
The problem is if you do get in trouble or banned, there is no customer support if you are not like top 0.1% of twitter. If you try to get it appealed or ask what is wrong, its some vague reason or cookie cutter reply.