Random thought - Why is there no toxicology report confirming Audrey Hale was on testosterone?
(media.communities.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Well, we're also waiting on the manifesto to get leaked, so...
My guess is tranny leftist rage because they're mentally ill faggots who can't handle reality
The excuse for not releasing the manifesto is that people will be motivated to do things by reading it.
A toxicology report is just a statement of fact. The fact that there isn't one when the person's identity is so key to determining motive is a huge red flag. They sealed away Maya McKinney's medical records last year as well.
There's something not right. When the shooter is male, we have their entire Internet history and their list of medications by the second day.
Can you point me to a "transgender" male where that happened?
God the downvote bots on him are real. You can literally look it up for every mass shooter with XY chromosomes, their manifestos got leaked instantly and the fact that they’re almost all universally on SSRIs
They don't want us to know what she is.
The stated motive for hiding it, to protect trannies, doesn't make sense. Everyone knows she is one because women couldn't allow a female shooter story....
That's the truth. No report likely means she was born female, and never was anything else. Her transition was nothing more than a haircut and a pronoun change on LinkedIn.
"blueprint on total destruction, so detailed..."
does anyone believe this stupid tranny bitch was some kind of logistical genius with a realistic plan for anything? Shooting up a school ain't exactly indicative of a grand scheme.
I think we can safely conclude, wherever the manuscript of The Communist Tranifesto may be, that it is composed of little more than ramblings and rantings about her 'struggles' over being 'queer' and 'trans'. About her 'transphobic' parents and other 'Christofascists'. About 'friends' on sites like Reddit whom encouraged her every step of the way, and from whom she probably learned of the whole 'trans genocide' narrative. And about that dead black woman, 'Sydney', with whom she was infatuated in the last few years of her life.
That's about it. Like you, I also find the notion of some young, bitter, confused loser doing much of anything meticulously to be absurd, let alone competently planning a killing spree. Sure, she fantasized about getting 'revenge' for years, and over that time acquired seven guns, but it is doubtful that she did anything more than that. Hence why she lasted a miserable fourteen minutes with a lowly kill count of six: hardly the outcome that she would have wanted. Think about it: If she was a good planner, she would have struck when they were in assembly or on recess break, i.e. when stopping her from spotting targets was not as simple as barricading the doors to classrooms. Because the staff quickly barricaded the doors, she spent most of her time shooting into them rather than at anyone.
I think it reveals she's a female supremacist.
That's why no toxicology report - no T in her system. Female killer. Killed "traitor women" as said in radical feminist communities.
lol, you were claiming that she killed only men on the first day. You also said that there was "no motive", which would mean that feminism was the motive. You're an idiot.
Nobody knew who was killed.
We still don't have a motive but I know your side needs this to be "muh evil tranny who hated women" so you can file it with your incel shit and pretend that you're not the problem.
Testosterone actually is pain in the ass to test for because it cycles over the course of the day.
It's actually very common to have patients get blood draws exactly at 8 am because that's considered the nadir of the circadian rhythm and the best reference point.
Surely, in a woman, the level of testosterone would be so low that fluctuations would be barely noticeable. Using T is supposed to bring their levels to that of a male, that should be easy to test for, it's a massive anomaly.
I would agree that the exogenous testosterone in a female would be obvious.
But every medical lab test relies on comparing it to an accepted lab reference range.
As opposed to most other hormone levels and other metrics that can be performed whenever, testosterone is notoriously finicky and untrustworthy unless done just right.
That's actually interesting. At least there's an explanation beyond "they're lying about her being trans" that can be considered.
Johnston quoted elsewhere: “I personally don’t want to know the depths to which her psychosis reached … When I’m told by an MNPD high-ranking official that it keeps him up at night, I’m going to defer to that person in that agency that I don’t need to read that.”
Okay, but those of us who aren’t retarded and trust ourselves to handle it… can we read it?
With the amount of chemicals leftists self admit taking, I wouldn't be surprised if any testosterone was the least likely thing we'd find.
SSRIs, again?
Find me a white woman in America who is not on SSRIs and I'll find you a billionaire who is not interested in money.
Possibly as who knows what widespread prescribing of these drugs has done
Honestly, the 80s were safer when everyone was just doing cocaine.
There's so many drugs being forced on kids now, it's completely fucked.
Eh, they can't hold any of that stuff back in perpetuity. This sort of thing has already been litigated, once the government no longer has the ability to show that releasing the information would interfere with an active investigation or prosecution they have to share it, because it's considered newsworthy.
Eventually they'll get sued and be forced to release it all, meaning both the full unabridged manifesto and any lab reports.