Lolis do not even resemble human beings, let alone human children.
Lolis are 100% intended to resemble human children, just like adult anime women with big tits are intended to resemble human adult women. It doesn't matter that they are not photo-realistic. There is a reason that human males get hard dicks for big anime titties but not for the cast of the Pixar movies Cars or Finding Nemo.
Lolis are carefully crafted to have traits that pedophiles will get triggered by & sexually aroused by. That's why they exist. Same with many other fetish bait tropes like Moe, Tsunderes, Yanderes, and all the others. This is especially true in harem anime but it leaks into mainstream titles as well since the Japanese are taught that putting this shit in their anime = more sales.
The overwhelming majority of people jacking off to drawings aren't looking for realism. That's WHY they're jacking off to drawings.
A pedo who masturbates to "unrealistic" lolis is still a pedo. I really don't care if you want to argue "b-b-but he's an ethical pedo because he doesn't go after real cp!" I DON'T CARE. HE IS STILL A PEDO. which is all I said to begin with.
It doesn't matter that they are not photo-realistic
They are not just 'not photorealistic', they do not even have human proportions. You're screaming 'pedophile!' at people jacking off to something that looks NOTHING like a human child and has a facial structure literally closer to that of a kitten than a human being.
Your opinions on this are transparently those of an artistic illiterate who has never drawn anything in his life and has zero understanding of or care for how character design/proportion plays with people's brains to create pleasing illusions of things that are simply not there.
A pedo who masturbates to "unrealistic" lolis is still a pedo.
This statement is your entire position, sI'm going to succinctly break down how retarded this statement is by translating it into plain English:
'A person who masturbates to something that looks nothing like a human child is a person who is sexually attracted to human children'.
You are really doing all you can to dilute the language, aren't you? The word "pedo" is gonna have as much meaning as the word "racist" when you're done with it. And I say that as someone who made the comment yesterday, before this thread even was posted, that actual pedos deserve the wood chipper.
this pedo apologism shit is so widespread here on kia2 one wonders if it's a psyop.
jacking it to kids: horrendous! how can leftism do this?
jacking it to digital art of kids: wow, stop cramping my style libtard, she COULD be a 900 year old dragon even though i jack it to her because she looks and acts like a kid.
It's very obvious why it's here if you think about it for two seconds. The core mission statement of KIA has always been "Stop fucking with my games/tv/movies/anime" and yet here come the puritans, with intent to try and fuck with anime, and they wonder why people get their backs up.
equating no longer having spiteful mutants fuck with our media to wanting sexy kids in that media makes about as much sense as lumping any criticism of, say, the CIA, in with flat earth reptillian Q people.
in other words, it's a poisoning of the well, it's pedophillic kookification. "free speech means i get to jack it to kids".
let me tell you something: i don't really approve of all the people wanting women with big tits in every game and show out there. i think it's hedonistic, it depraves society and the character of the consumer, and it's basically adjacent to pornography, which does those former things tenfold.
but, i get it when people say that they want women with big tits. i'm heterosexual, i too like that, and between that and having 400kg negress muttoid abominations in my media, i'll take the japanese women with the big tits.
what i won't ever get is why you would seriously, as a supposedly sane and healthy person, want sexualized little kids in your media. it is only pedophiles that want that, and pedophiles are insane, unhealthy, and deserve the rope. it is that simple. waiting for one to actually abuse a kid when they tell you upfront they're a pedophile (by, for instance, saying they like drawings of sexy naked kids...) is just too stupid to be a natural occurrence among so-called free-thinkers.
Why, because it's a single point of failure that is relatively easy to defend. Note I said relatively. It till takes some doing. If you cede it suddenly you have the axiom "some drawings are not okay". Now the question is who decides which drawings are ok, where the line is, an half a dozen other fronts you now have to defend if you don't want things you enjoy censored or banned.
I instead, prefer to stick to the principle "it's a drawing, it's fiction, it's free speech, it should be defended." It's one point of failure. It's not always an easy point to defend, but if it goes down, the mess is yet unforseen.
TDLR: we aren't defending it, we are using loli as a canary in the coal mine. EVERY action taken to 'stop this pedopholic artwork' has then been used to stamp out free speech (payment processors refusing service, refusal to allow content despite meeting tos etc)
Basically it's our new Alex Jones metric of how the government wants to fuck you.
They've been lurking about for a while now. They are most visible when a new platform like Gab or Parler ban loli. It's just free speech, man. Don't force your outdated beliefs on everything.
Need I remind you that #GamerGate started on 4chan > 8chan, where several loli boards were prominent parts of the community? Where half of our anime avatar brigade on Twitter used loli characters? Where we occasionally spammed lolis at people on social media to piss off pedos and smug journos? Fuck one of the spinoff sites is literally named "smug lolis."
The ones "lurking about" are these latecomer normalfags.
"They" have been here since the beginning dude. This board has its roots in shitting on trash journalism related to video games, anime, and other pop culture. If anything, the boomer moral justice warrior puritans are the outsiders. As seen by them getting shit on so hard in this thread.
Lolis are 100% intended to resemble human children, just like adult anime women with big tits are intended to resemble human adult women. It doesn't matter that they are not photo-realistic. There is a reason that human males get hard dicks for big anime titties but not for the cast of the Pixar movies Cars or Finding Nemo.
Lolis are carefully crafted to have traits that pedophiles will get triggered by & sexually aroused by. That's why they exist. Same with many other fetish bait tropes like Moe, Tsunderes, Yanderes, and all the others. This is especially true in harem anime but it leaks into mainstream titles as well since the Japanese are taught that putting this shit in their anime = more sales.
A pedo who masturbates to "unrealistic" lolis is still a pedo. I really don't care if you want to argue "b-b-but he's an ethical pedo because he doesn't go after real cp!" I DON'T CARE. HE IS STILL A PEDO. which is all I said to begin with.
They are not just 'not photorealistic', they do not even have human proportions. You're screaming 'pedophile!' at people jacking off to something that looks NOTHING like a human child and has a facial structure literally closer to that of a kitten than a human being.
Your opinions on this are transparently those of an artistic illiterate who has never drawn anything in his life and has zero understanding of or care for how character design/proportion plays with people's brains to create pleasing illusions of things that are simply not there.
This statement is your entire position, sI'm going to succinctly break down how retarded this statement is by translating it into plain English:
'A person who masturbates to something that looks nothing like a human child is a person who is sexually attracted to human children'.
I think you literally just want to fuck lolis & you're taking this all very personally.
Even if that were true, which that user has consistently denied, it wouldn't change his systematic dissection of your retarded argument.
I'm not into loli art.
You are really doing all you can to dilute the language, aren't you? The word "pedo" is gonna have as much meaning as the word "racist" when you're done with it. And I say that as someone who made the comment yesterday, before this thread even was posted, that actual pedos deserve the wood chipper.
this pedo apologism shit is so widespread here on kia2 one wonders if it's a psyop.
jacking it to kids: horrendous! how can leftism do this?
jacking it to digital art of kids: wow, stop cramping my style libtard, she COULD be a 900 year old dragon even though i jack it to her because she looks and acts like a kid.
It's very obvious why it's here if you think about it for two seconds. The core mission statement of KIA has always been "Stop fucking with my games/tv/movies/anime" and yet here come the puritans, with intent to try and fuck with anime, and they wonder why people get their backs up.
equating no longer having spiteful mutants fuck with our media to wanting sexy kids in that media makes about as much sense as lumping any criticism of, say, the CIA, in with flat earth reptillian Q people.
in other words, it's a poisoning of the well, it's pedophillic kookification. "free speech means i get to jack it to kids".
let me tell you something: i don't really approve of all the people wanting women with big tits in every game and show out there. i think it's hedonistic, it depraves society and the character of the consumer, and it's basically adjacent to pornography, which does those former things tenfold.
but, i get it when people say that they want women with big tits. i'm heterosexual, i too like that, and between that and having 400kg negress muttoid abominations in my media, i'll take the japanese women with the big tits.
what i won't ever get is why you would seriously, as a supposedly sane and healthy person, want sexualized little kids in your media. it is only pedophiles that want that, and pedophiles are insane, unhealthy, and deserve the rope. it is that simple. waiting for one to actually abuse a kid when they tell you upfront they're a pedophile (by, for instance, saying they like drawings of sexy naked kids...) is just too stupid to be a natural occurrence among so-called free-thinkers.
Why, because it's a single point of failure that is relatively easy to defend. Note I said relatively. It till takes some doing. If you cede it suddenly you have the axiom "some drawings are not okay". Now the question is who decides which drawings are ok, where the line is, an half a dozen other fronts you now have to defend if you don't want things you enjoy censored or banned.
I instead, prefer to stick to the principle "it's a drawing, it's fiction, it's free speech, it should be defended." It's one point of failure. It's not always an easy point to defend, but if it goes down, the mess is yet unforseen.
I guess kia2 gets a lot of fringe refugees but I honestly didn't notice pro-loli types until now.
You can stop trying to make that link now as I made a post 3 months ago discussing it
TDLR: we aren't defending it, we are using loli as a canary in the coal mine. EVERY action taken to 'stop this pedopholic artwork' has then been used to stamp out free speech (payment processors refusing service, refusal to allow content despite meeting tos etc)
Basically it's our new Alex Jones metric of how the government wants to fuck you.
They've been lurking about for a while now. They are most visible when a new platform like Gab or Parler ban loli. It's just free speech, man. Don't force your outdated beliefs on everything.
Need I remind you that #GamerGate started on 4chan > 8chan, where several loli boards were prominent parts of the community? Where half of our anime avatar brigade on Twitter used loli characters? Where we occasionally spammed lolis at people on social media to piss off pedos and smug journos? Fuck one of the spinoff sites is literally named "smug lolis."
The ones "lurking about" are these latecomer normalfags.
"They" have been here since the beginning dude. This board has its roots in shitting on trash journalism related to video games, anime, and other pop culture. If anything, the boomer moral justice warrior puritans are the outsiders. As seen by them getting shit on so hard in this thread.