I was right in the middle writing a response before I saw this.
Telling teachers that you are being bullied only makes the situation worse for the simple reason that we have made it essentially illegal to punish children
That's what I had written. And it looks these girls figured that out at around the same age I did.
Are children smarter than the adults who come up with these rules, or are these rules having precisely the intended effect?
You genuinely have to wonder if policies like “zero tolerance” where the bully is free to do what they please while the victim gets punished for standing up for themselves are done intentionally so as a form of mass demoralization. The weaker kids are basically being told that they have no hope of escape and can only pray that the “strong” get bored of you. You can’t stand up for yourself, you have to rely on big mommy government to help you, which for the vast majority of cases does not care about them.
Though the other thing is that the parents are weak-willed faggots who don’t bother “fighting” for their children and defending them from the retardation of the school system.
It's not just demoralization.
It's a humiliation ritual and dehumanization of a conquered host population, to keep us pacified. Most White Western countries aren't ruled by White people. We're being systematically replaced and genocided. We're being denied basic human rights. We're being propagandized to hate ourselves, our people, and our ancestors. We're being demoralized, humiliated, and dehumanized. This is the only way the globalists could conquer us, through subversive infiltration and corruption. They couldn't conquer us through military might.
The first natural right is to live. The second natural right, therefore, is to have the ability to defend one's life. Since we're social beings, and group up along homogeneous lines to pursue mutual interests, we form communities with similar and like minded people, and collectivize with them. Thus, we also have the natural rights to defend our homes/communities/countries, to control who enters them, to associate with whom we choose, and to collectivize to pursue mutual interests.
All of these natural rights (and more) are being denied to White people. This girl had the right to defend herself, just as every other bullied kid does. The globalist/feminist controlled schools, enacts "zero tolerance" policy to teach kids not to defend themselves. They push the idea that violence is never the answer. On the contrary, violence does have its uses, and is the basis for politics itself, but the people in power don't want White people to use it, to defend ourselves against people that are enslaving and killing us.
When I went to school, they would still issue in-school suspension. Which is a ridiculous name, but it does suck enough that most students will try to avoid it. If you reoffended enough, they'd give you a real suspension. At this point the parent has to find childcare, if the kid is young enough, so that can pique some action. For older kids, they probably just enjoy it. However, after suspension is over you have to show up again or your parents get charged in court. Finally, if you fucked up enough they'd expel you which really meant sending you to alternative school. Then I think at 18 you were done regardless. I mean they might let you finish your year, but they weren't keeping adult degenerates on for years and years.
This was all with zero tolerance, but you could still punish the children. And not by hitting them either.
We didn't have phones until the very end though, and even when we did the wireless internet was in its infancy.
One of them is said to have informed herself on the Internet about the legal situation regarding her age. src in German
I was right in the middle writing a response before I saw this.
That's what I had written. And it looks these girls figured that out at around the same age I did.
Are children smarter than the adults who come up with these rules, or are these rules having precisely the intended effect?
You genuinely have to wonder if policies like “zero tolerance” where the bully is free to do what they please while the victim gets punished for standing up for themselves are done intentionally so as a form of mass demoralization. The weaker kids are basically being told that they have no hope of escape and can only pray that the “strong” get bored of you. You can’t stand up for yourself, you have to rely on big mommy government to help you, which for the vast majority of cases does not care about them. Though the other thing is that the parents are weak-willed faggots who don’t bother “fighting” for their children and defending them from the retardation of the school system.
It's not just demoralization. It's a humiliation ritual and dehumanization of a conquered host population, to keep us pacified. Most White Western countries aren't ruled by White people. We're being systematically replaced and genocided. We're being denied basic human rights. We're being propagandized to hate ourselves, our people, and our ancestors. We're being demoralized, humiliated, and dehumanized. This is the only way the globalists could conquer us, through subversive infiltration and corruption. They couldn't conquer us through military might.
The first natural right is to live. The second natural right, therefore, is to have the ability to defend one's life. Since we're social beings, and group up along homogeneous lines to pursue mutual interests, we form communities with similar and like minded people, and collectivize with them. Thus, we also have the natural rights to defend our homes/communities/countries, to control who enters them, to associate with whom we choose, and to collectivize to pursue mutual interests.
All of these natural rights (and more) are being denied to White people. This girl had the right to defend herself, just as every other bullied kid does. The globalist/feminist controlled schools, enacts "zero tolerance" policy to teach kids not to defend themselves. They push the idea that violence is never the answer. On the contrary, violence does have its uses, and is the basis for politics itself, but the people in power don't want White people to use it, to defend ourselves against people that are enslaving and killing us.
When I went to school, they would still issue in-school suspension. Which is a ridiculous name, but it does suck enough that most students will try to avoid it. If you reoffended enough, they'd give you a real suspension. At this point the parent has to find childcare, if the kid is young enough, so that can pique some action. For older kids, they probably just enjoy it. However, after suspension is over you have to show up again or your parents get charged in court. Finally, if you fucked up enough they'd expel you which really meant sending you to alternative school. Then I think at 18 you were done regardless. I mean they might let you finish your year, but they weren't keeping adult degenerates on for years and years.
This was all with zero tolerance, but you could still punish the children. And not by hitting them either.
We didn't have phones until the very end though, and even when we did the wireless internet was in its infancy.
Isn't she fucking smart.
Letting bad people get away because they have lobbying power has consequences.