It's not. It's the fucking truth. It was a mistake to believe they had good in them, and it's a chronic illness for our society.
It's impossible to parody someone who actually believes half the human population and people who are necessary to the continuation of the human race have "outstayed their welcome".
Anyone who's sick enough to believe they can police who can walk on the street doesn't belong in society.
You absolutely should not be able to follow people around.
Literally the only argument anyone has to defend them is "muh biology" - developing artificial wombs has to be cheaper than funding their endless hate by now, surely?
You shouldn't be able to rape people either, but you also can't just ruin lives for nothing and that's why there is supposed to be an evidence based justice system. The UK passed that point a long time ago.
Literally the only argument anyone has to defend them is "muh biology"
How do we defend men's rapes, murders, and violence?
You shouldn't be able to rape people either, but you also can't just ruin lives for nothing and that's why there is supposed to be an evidence based justice system. The UK passed that point a long time ago.
...you suddenly said something totally reasonable? Like I said, I'm not at all confident that things will go fine in the UK.
It is frustrating that the media solely focuses on cat-calling and wolf-whistling. Anything in a public place that is deemed to cause distress, alarm, offence or harassment based on sexism will fall foul of this proposed law. Indeed, the act of ignoring women to safeguard yourself from this proposed law could become a violation of this proposed law!
The Online Safety Bill and the Worker Protection Law deals with the online and employment spaces.
And it's only going to get worse. The effectively guaranteed winner of the SNP leadership contest supports the introduction of a misogyny bill and one of the proposals is the criminalisation of involuntary celibacy. And it will be guaranteed that if that becomes law, it will spread to the other parts of the UK through one or more new laws.
Deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night
And how do they judge intent?
Making obscene or aggressive comments towards a person in the street
Aggressive? I thought this was about sex? Are you making it illegal to call a self-obsessed piece of shit who makes you walk on the opposite side of the road a self obsessed piece of shit?
Making obscene or offensive gestures towards a person in the street
Again, does this ban insults?
Obstructing someone's path
#WasteTheirTime2023, report every woman walking slowly as if they blocked your path.
Driving or riding a vehicle slowly near someone making a journey
Asking for directions is now illegal because your masters said so.
Then make some predictions about the practical effect of these laws. How many people will be prosecuted without having done something wrong?
The worst thing is that because of the crappy law system in the UK, with 16 times more arrests being made for internet comments than in Russia, I can't even assert that these laws will not be abused.
Never should have elected someone who had a woman holding their wealth.
His wealth. Stop saying 'their'.
And it's a mistake to 'elect' rich people, insofar as you think these people are elected.
How many people will be prosecuted without having done something wrong?
That's the whole point of these kinds of laws. They'll only be selectively enforced. The number of people affected will be small; the chilling effects will be large. And they'll be politically useful.
Let's go by what the bill and the law it intends to amend says (obvious disclaimer that this is not legal advice).
The bill intends to add a new section based on Section 4A called section 4B which makes it an offence to do or say anything that causes harassment, alarm or distress based on the relevant person's sex. Which carries a maximum two year sentence.
And Section 4A states if someone intends to cause harassment, alarm or distress based on threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or an individual who displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting. An offence carries a maximum of a six month sentence (but only if someone is found not gulity of an offence under 4B).
The problem is with the wording of what could cause someone to fall foul of the law, it is vaguely worded and could easily be interpreted to capture a wide range of behaviours, speech and language. There is also the prospect of the law being applied unequally based on pre-suppositions, bias and ideology regarding men and women.
This is why I get annoyed with the press who merely mention cat-calling and wolf-whistling as if they are the only things being targeted.
And we haven't even got to the prospect of a new Scottish Misogyny Bill being proposed after the SNP leadership contest which is likely to be repeated across the rest of the UK. There is the prospect of criminalising involuntary celibacy as a proposal for that bill.
We can't fight them in the courts, we can't fight them at the ballot box, we can't fight them with truths, traitors are forcing us to surrender.
Again you trot out this "we" bullshit when you inevitably turn on everyone for perceived slights such as wanting children and actually producing a genetic legacy [tradcucks] rather than buying the same Epic game multiple times as you do.
You have no side. You have no team. You don't even have something to leave behind and actively attack those that do or mention wanting to.
Additionally, this bill hasn't passed yet, nor does it apply to "the UK" as you've decided to title things here.
It's a private members bill that has passed a stage of the process and only applies to England and Wales. Not that you let details ever get in the way of sperging out.
I'm pretty sure most of these things are already illegal in most places, except for "catcalling".
Following someone to their house is illegal, not just happening to be on the street at the same time.
Women have overstayed their welcome in society.
Doesn't need to be to his house. Isn't that stalking?
Beyond parody.
Stalking is when they do it several times, unless they go to a place that's very personal like your home.
It's not. It's the fucking truth. It was a mistake to believe they had good in them, and it's a chronic illness for our society.
Anyone who's sick enough to believe they can police who can walk on the street doesn't belong in society.
It's impossible to parody someone who actually believes half the human population and people who are necessary to the continuation of the human race have "outstayed their welcome".
You absolutely should not be able to follow people around.
Literally the only argument anyone has to defend them is "muh biology" - developing artificial wombs has to be cheaper than funding their endless hate by now, surely?
You shouldn't be able to rape people either, but you also can't just ruin lives for nothing and that's why there is supposed to be an evidence based justice system. The UK passed that point a long time ago.
How do we defend men's rapes, murders, and violence?
...you suddenly said something totally reasonable? Like I said, I'm not at all confident that things will go fine in the UK.
With the many, many achievements of good men. Real achievements, not ESG funded bullshit like women's "achievements".
I'll be able to tell you how bad it is soon. I'm due to return to help with a family issue, providing unvaxxed travel in and out of the US is allowed.
It is frustrating that the media solely focuses on cat-calling and wolf-whistling. Anything in a public place that is deemed to cause distress, alarm, offence or harassment based on sexism will fall foul of this proposed law. Indeed, the act of ignoring women to safeguard yourself from this proposed law could become a violation of this proposed law!
The Online Safety Bill and the Worker Protection Law deals with the online and employment spaces.
And it's only going to get worse. The effectively guaranteed winner of the SNP leadership contest supports the introduction of a misogyny bill and one of the proposals is the criminalisation of involuntary celibacy. And it will be guaranteed that if that becomes law, it will spread to the other parts of the UK through one or more new laws.
Push her into the street, then.
This is the true equality feminists have been fighting for. ❤️🔥🔥🔥👏🙌👏🙌👏🙌👏🙌👏
Pathetic.
It's somehow worse when it's a man sticking the knife in, instead of the usual enemy.
What makes it even worse is that we all know they won't enforce this evenly.
They'll enforce it on average white men. Hot white men will get laid. Non whites will be allowed to rape women without penalty.
We can't fight them in the courts, we can't fight them at the ballot box, we can't fight them with truths, traitors are forcing us to surrender.
It is literally more of a crime to walk close to a woman than to punch someone. Non-racially motivated assault carries a penalty of community service if the injuries are not serious.
The private member's bill will criminalise:
And how do they judge intent?
Aggressive? I thought this was about sex? Are you making it illegal to call a self-obsessed piece of shit who makes you walk on the opposite side of the road a self obsessed piece of shit?
Again, does this ban insults?
#WasteTheirTime2023, report every woman walking slowly as if they blocked your path.
Asking for directions is now illegal because your masters said so.
It is retarded enough without you exaggerating.
I'm not exaggerating.
Never should have elected someone who had a woman holding their wealth. Huge fucking mistake.
The #1 issue in the UK now must be to put this sick cult back in their box and lock it.
Then make some predictions about the practical effect of these laws. How many people will be prosecuted without having done something wrong?
The worst thing is that because of the crappy law system in the UK, with 16 times more arrests being made for internet comments than in Russia, I can't even assert that these laws will not be abused.
His wealth. Stop saying 'their'.
And it's a mistake to 'elect' rich people, insofar as you think these people are elected.
That's the whole point of these kinds of laws. They'll only be selectively enforced. The number of people affected will be small; the chilling effects will be large. And they'll be politically useful.
Let's go by what the bill and the law it intends to amend says (obvious disclaimer that this is not legal advice).
The bill intends to add a new section based on Section 4A called section 4B which makes it an offence to do or say anything that causes harassment, alarm or distress based on the relevant person's sex. Which carries a maximum two year sentence.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-03/0252/220252.pdf
And Section 4A states if someone intends to cause harassment, alarm or distress based on threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or an individual who displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting. An offence carries a maximum of a six month sentence (but only if someone is found not gulity of an offence under 4B).
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/64/section/4A
The problem is with the wording of what could cause someone to fall foul of the law, it is vaguely worded and could easily be interpreted to capture a wide range of behaviours, speech and language. There is also the prospect of the law being applied unequally based on pre-suppositions, bias and ideology regarding men and women.
This is why I get annoyed with the press who merely mention cat-calling and wolf-whistling as if they are the only things being targeted.
And we haven't even got to the prospect of a new Scottish Misogyny Bill being proposed after the SNP leadership contest which is likely to be repeated across the rest of the UK. There is the prospect of criminalising involuntary celibacy as a proposal for that bill.
Depends on two things :
How deep the Everard Inquisition into the police ends up going.
How sick women's heads actually are.
My bet for the former is pretty far, it will get to a point where women's non-issues pass burglary and theft as priorities.
My prediction for women's sadism...I'll leave that one blank.
It's not women torturing you, it's yourself. They are not sadists, you are a masochist.
Actually you are, and again it's through editorialising your titles as you've been called out on before by others.
Your title:
Second line of the article:
For someone who claims to be from the UK you really don't seem to know what the UK is.
United Kingdom:
This article doesn't involve Scotland or Northern Ireland yet you've titled this thread in a way that suggests it does.
I'm sure that the very feminist government of Scotland will pass something worse and nobody gives a shit about Northern Ireland.
Again you trot out this "we" bullshit when you inevitably turn on everyone for perceived slights such as wanting children and actually producing a genetic legacy [tradcucks] rather than buying the same Epic game multiple times as you do.
You have no side. You have no team. You don't even have something to leave behind and actively attack those that do or mention wanting to.
Additionally, this bill hasn't passed yet, nor does it apply to "the UK" as you've decided to title things here.
It's a private members bill that has passed a stage of the process and only applies to England and Wales. Not that you let details ever get in the way of sperging out.
Oh look, another law nobody felt the need for until 3rd world refuse was allowed into the country.
Women have been pushing for this since before the Libyan migrant crisis was even a thought.