When every position is simply a political position, you simply use the title and the jurisdiction it has to enforce your political control. When you look at the Soviet System, it kind of shows that what your title is, doesn't matter. What matters is the influence you are weilding within that job title. Officially, on paper, the General Secretary of the Soviet Union is absolutely NOT the most powerful position. The president was.... until Joseph Stalin became General Secretary. Even then, he pretended he had less power than he really had.
When he died, I think Kruschev was head of like five different departments, committees, and agencies. The titles don't mean much beyond a public statement of who and what is under your direct command before you make a move to seize power.
In a Socialist system, there is no reason that the effective dictator can't be the Attorney General, the Head of the Department of Agriculture, or the Directory of National Security. Being "Prime Minister", "Premier", or "President", or "Governor", doesn't actually mean all that much.
An AG couldnāt do this, in Australia or NZ. Like, yes, āillusions of democracyā and all that, but hosting an event like this would be beyond the pale, and they would most definitely be firedā¦
So thatās an interesting point of difference.
I donāt think this would be possible in the UK, either.
But perhaps they just interpret their position differently, in New York State, to other Anglo countriesā¦
I don't suppose there's anything actually keeping them from setting up some sort of public event. I almost wonder if they could just do some sort of "mandatory work fun time" where she schedules it at a Drag Show.
Seriously. The left uses this whole āprideā thing as a religion, in everything but name. The government should be restricted from having anything to do with it.
We arenāt supposed to have an official state religion, but itās exactly what the left gets away with.
I like the protestors holding signs with pictures of the drag acts. That's such a good strategy. It's basically the same as Libs of Tiktok, and you've seen how much that pisses off the alphabet soup and other progressives. Expose them; use their own degeneracy against them.
Those are your shock troops? The girl scouts look like they can kerbstomp them easily..
They're probably hoping a show of force is enough to dissuade protestors and momentum building against them, not realising that this involves corruption of children, the few issues EVERY religion and anyone not a drone agrees is a hill worth dying on.
Hereās a thought: why on earth is an AG involved in an event like that..? In what world is that acceptable..?
This isnāt fucking Gotham (yet). An AG (at least, in my non-Yank understanding of the role) should never be involved in something like thisā¦ š¤¦š»āāļø
It fundamentally goes against some of the key tenets of the role - impartiality and acting-without-open-biasā¦
I realize those ideals are no longer even given lip service to, but even stillā¦ I would say this goes against the fundamental idea of what an AG is supposed to do, and be, in a functioning legal system, FMLā¦ š
I just heard a story about the governor of Illinois donating (double the legal limit) to two different judges' campaigns, who are then going on to rule on things like injunctions against the governor's unconstitutional dictates.
We have rules. Politicians just don't care about them. And not enough people care that they don't care, so they can keep doing it.
This just isnāt a thing that someone in that same position could do, in most other Anglosphere/āWesternā countriesā¦
I realize that the US treats AG positions slightly differently to elsewhere, but the closest the Australian AG, say, would get to something like this, isā¦
Challenging Japan on its Antarctic whaling program (which happened). Or banning live export of cattle to Indo and the Middle East (which backfired). Thatās about it. š¤·š»āāļø
libtards have turned AG/DA positions into the tip of their spear in societal transformational change, primarily by using racist policies to let blacks get away with crime.
they've done this before, in the 1960s and 1970s. It had the predictable results of a huge increase in crime. this was a large factor in ushering in the Reagan revolution and crushing liberals for a generation.
liberals never learn and have no new ideas. all their ideas are just a repeat of their last chimpout in the 60s and 70s, but more focused on trannies this time since the faggots got all their rights already, and more nakedly focused on brainwashing children with naked CRT & John Money mindfucking this time. John Money's ideology traces back to the 1960s. None of this is new. CRT is just old communist Critical Theory twisted into being about race instead of class.
The Left is intellectually and morally bankrupt. However they are very good at manipulating and preying upon human weaknesses and stupidity, a game the Right pretty much totally ignores (to its peril, we can now see). Since children are the stupidest and most emotional, it's only natural that the Left would realize it needed to laser focus on them.
I pray that in 2024 we get a new Red revolution and see the Democrats crushed to the point where they devolve into infighting and knife the wokes to maintain electoral viability, just like they were forced to do in the 1980s. Bill Clinton was actually VERY conservative compared to the Democrats of today.
Because if that doesn't happen, it's going to be the road to national divorce.
The libtards that run New York City:
Riots? I sleep.
Faggots want to wave their dicks and assholes around in front of little kids? REAL SHIT.
why is the attorney general hosting events? doesn't she have a job to do?
No, and that is her job.
When every position is simply a political position, you simply use the title and the jurisdiction it has to enforce your political control. When you look at the Soviet System, it kind of shows that what your title is, doesn't matter. What matters is the influence you are weilding within that job title. Officially, on paper, the General Secretary of the Soviet Union is absolutely NOT the most powerful position. The president was.... until Joseph Stalin became General Secretary. Even then, he pretended he had less power than he really had.
When he died, I think Kruschev was head of like five different departments, committees, and agencies. The titles don't mean much beyond a public statement of who and what is under your direct command before you make a move to seize power.
In a Socialist system, there is no reason that the effective dictator can't be the Attorney General, the Head of the Department of Agriculture, or the Directory of National Security. Being "Prime Minister", "Premier", or "President", or "Governor", doesn't actually mean all that much.
While this is trueā¦
An AG couldnāt do this, in Australia or NZ. Like, yes, āillusions of democracyā and all that, but hosting an event like this would be beyond the pale, and they would most definitely be firedā¦
So thatās an interesting point of difference.
I donāt think this would be possible in the UK, either.
But perhaps they just interpret their position differently, in New York State, to other Anglo countriesā¦
I don't suppose there's anything actually keeping them from setting up some sort of public event. I almost wonder if they could just do some sort of "mandatory work fun time" where she schedules it at a Drag Show.
Democrats treat these AG/DA positions as purely political. She's doing what all politicians do: campaigning.
My point exactly.
That, in itself, is totally unacceptableā¦
Let alone calling on your private goon squad to act as security for it, lolololā¦
Seriously. The left uses this whole āprideā thing as a religion, in everything but name. The government should be restricted from having anything to do with it.
We arenāt supposed to have an official state religion, but itās exactly what the left gets away with.
I like the protestors holding signs with pictures of the drag acts. That's such a good strategy. It's basically the same as Libs of Tiktok, and you've seen how much that pisses off the alphabet soup and other progressives. Expose them; use their own degeneracy against them.
Those are your shock troops? The girl scouts look like they can kerbstomp them easily..
They're probably hoping a show of force is enough to dissuade protestors and momentum building against them, not realising that this involves corruption of children, the few issues EVERY religion and anyone not a drone agrees is a hill worth dying on.
These are the clowns that are coordinating with the Secret Service to deal with the circus that will surround the inevitable Trump indictment.
This is shit I'd expect to see in England or Canada. Scary times.
Hereās a thought: why on earth is an AG involved in an event like that..? In what world is that acceptable..?
This isnāt fucking Gotham (yet). An AG (at least, in my non-Yank understanding of the role) should never be involved in something like thisā¦ š¤¦š»āāļø
It fundamentally goes against some of the key tenets of the role - impartiality and acting-without-open-biasā¦
I realize those ideals are no longer even given lip service to, but even stillā¦ I would say this goes against the fundamental idea of what an AG is supposed to do, and be, in a functioning legal system, FMLā¦ š
TL;DR: Things are really fucked.
I just heard a story about the governor of Illinois donating (double the legal limit) to two different judges' campaigns, who are then going on to rule on things like injunctions against the governor's unconstitutional dictates.
We have rules. Politicians just don't care about them. And not enough people care that they don't care, so they can keep doing it.
Stasi are stasi even if you change the name.
She's virtue signaling as part of a political campaign for higher office.
Even thenā¦
This just isnāt a thing that someone in that same position could do, in most other Anglosphere/āWesternā countriesā¦
I realize that the US treats AG positions slightly differently to elsewhere, but the closest the Australian AG, say, would get to something like this, isā¦
Challenging Japan on its Antarctic whaling program (which happened). Or banning live export of cattle to Indo and the Middle East (which backfired). Thatās about it. š¤·š»āāļø
libtards have turned AG/DA positions into the tip of their spear in societal transformational change, primarily by using racist policies to let blacks get away with crime.
they've done this before, in the 1960s and 1970s. It had the predictable results of a huge increase in crime. this was a large factor in ushering in the Reagan revolution and crushing liberals for a generation.
liberals never learn and have no new ideas. all their ideas are just a repeat of their last chimpout in the 60s and 70s, but more focused on trannies this time since the faggots got all their rights already, and more nakedly focused on brainwashing children with naked CRT & John Money mindfucking this time. John Money's ideology traces back to the 1960s. None of this is new. CRT is just old communist Critical Theory twisted into being about race instead of class.
The Left is intellectually and morally bankrupt. However they are very good at manipulating and preying upon human weaknesses and stupidity, a game the Right pretty much totally ignores (to its peril, we can now see). Since children are the stupidest and most emotional, it's only natural that the Left would realize it needed to laser focus on them.
I pray that in 2024 we get a new Red revolution and see the Democrats crushed to the point where they devolve into infighting and knife the wokes to maintain electoral viability, just like they were forced to do in the 1980s. Bill Clinton was actually VERY conservative compared to the Democrats of today.
Because if that doesn't happen, it's going to be the road to national divorce.