Hereās a thought: why on earth is an AG involved in an event like that..? In what world is that acceptable..?
This isnāt fucking Gotham (yet). An AG (at least, in my non-Yank understanding of the role) should never be involved in something like thisā¦ š¤¦š»āāļø
It fundamentally goes against some of the key tenets of the role - impartiality and acting-without-open-biasā¦
I realize those ideals are no longer even given lip service to, but even stillā¦ I would say this goes against the fundamental idea of what an AG is supposed to do, and be, in a functioning legal system, FMLā¦ š
I just heard a story about the governor of Illinois donating (double the legal limit) to two different judges' campaigns, who are then going on to rule on things like injunctions against the governor's unconstitutional dictates.
We have rules. Politicians just don't care about them. And not enough people care that they don't care, so they can keep doing it.
This just isnāt a thing that someone in that same position could do, in most other Anglosphere/āWesternā countriesā¦
I realize that the US treats AG positions slightly differently to elsewhere, but the closest the Australian AG, say, would get to something like this, isā¦
Challenging Japan on its Antarctic whaling program (which happened). Or banning live export of cattle to Indo and the Middle East (which backfired). Thatās about it. š¤·š»āāļø
libtards have turned AG/DA positions into the tip of their spear in societal transformational change, primarily by using racist policies to let blacks get away with crime.
they've done this before, in the 1960s and 1970s. It had the predictable results of a huge increase in crime. this was a large factor in ushering in the Reagan revolution and crushing liberals for a generation.
liberals never learn and have no new ideas. all their ideas are just a repeat of their last chimpout in the 60s and 70s, but more focused on trannies this time since the faggots got all their rights already, and more nakedly focused on brainwashing children with naked CRT & John Money mindfucking this time. John Money's ideology traces back to the 1960s. None of this is new. CRT is just old communist Critical Theory twisted into being about race instead of class.
The Left is intellectually and morally bankrupt. However they are very good at manipulating and preying upon human weaknesses and stupidity, a game the Right pretty much totally ignores (to its peril, we can now see). Since children are the stupidest and most emotional, it's only natural that the Left would realize it needed to laser focus on them.
I pray that in 2024 we get a new Red revolution and see the Democrats crushed to the point where they devolve into infighting and knife the wokes to maintain electoral viability, just like they were forced to do in the 1980s. Bill Clinton was actually VERY conservative compared to the Democrats of today.
Because if that doesn't happen, it's going to be the road to national divorce.
Hereās a thought: why on earth is an AG involved in an event like that..? In what world is that acceptable..?
This isnāt fucking Gotham (yet). An AG (at least, in my non-Yank understanding of the role) should never be involved in something like thisā¦ š¤¦š»āāļø
It fundamentally goes against some of the key tenets of the role - impartiality and acting-without-open-biasā¦
I realize those ideals are no longer even given lip service to, but even stillā¦ I would say this goes against the fundamental idea of what an AG is supposed to do, and be, in a functioning legal system, FMLā¦ š
TL;DR: Things are really fucked.
I just heard a story about the governor of Illinois donating (double the legal limit) to two different judges' campaigns, who are then going on to rule on things like injunctions against the governor's unconstitutional dictates.
We have rules. Politicians just don't care about them. And not enough people care that they don't care, so they can keep doing it.
Stasi are stasi even if you change the name.
She's virtue signaling as part of a political campaign for higher office.
Even thenā¦
This just isnāt a thing that someone in that same position could do, in most other Anglosphere/āWesternā countriesā¦
I realize that the US treats AG positions slightly differently to elsewhere, but the closest the Australian AG, say, would get to something like this, isā¦
Challenging Japan on its Antarctic whaling program (which happened). Or banning live export of cattle to Indo and the Middle East (which backfired). Thatās about it. š¤·š»āāļø
libtards have turned AG/DA positions into the tip of their spear in societal transformational change, primarily by using racist policies to let blacks get away with crime.
they've done this before, in the 1960s and 1970s. It had the predictable results of a huge increase in crime. this was a large factor in ushering in the Reagan revolution and crushing liberals for a generation.
liberals never learn and have no new ideas. all their ideas are just a repeat of their last chimpout in the 60s and 70s, but more focused on trannies this time since the faggots got all their rights already, and more nakedly focused on brainwashing children with naked CRT & John Money mindfucking this time. John Money's ideology traces back to the 1960s. None of this is new. CRT is just old communist Critical Theory twisted into being about race instead of class.
The Left is intellectually and morally bankrupt. However they are very good at manipulating and preying upon human weaknesses and stupidity, a game the Right pretty much totally ignores (to its peril, we can now see). Since children are the stupidest and most emotional, it's only natural that the Left would realize it needed to laser focus on them.
I pray that in 2024 we get a new Red revolution and see the Democrats crushed to the point where they devolve into infighting and knife the wokes to maintain electoral viability, just like they were forced to do in the 1980s. Bill Clinton was actually VERY conservative compared to the Democrats of today.
Because if that doesn't happen, it's going to be the road to national divorce.