How the artist thinks
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (35)
sorted by:
"I had to consult a lawyer" repeated several times and yet Meg never told us what the conclusion was. Seems the show is still going on so... did he laugh at you for asking? Or did he just quietly collect his consultation fee and laugh after you were gone and he was depositing your check?
The reason Shakespeare was performed by crossdressed men was because women were not worthy of being in plays.
See, this is the only way you can actually stop women invading our spaces.
You getting upvoted for having very similar takes to myself is interesting.
He's more or less the only other user active on your blog/win so it wouldn't be the most surprising thing for it to turn out to be yet another of your alts - something others are bringing up in regards to other users that have similar spergouts like you do.
Whether it turns out to be true or not you already poisoned that well with your ban evasion last year proving you have at least made 1 other account thereby demolishing any credence you might have had.
Fuck off stormfaggot. Only your people use alts and everyone knows it. Hell, I've seen you stupid fucks forget to switch accounts and reply to yourselves.
Also, if it was my alt, wouldn't it prove that the downvoting against me really is just a concerted effort to try and make me leave by stormfaggots?
I see you're still arguing like a leftist/woman and hoping name calling will actually matter for once.
You've literally admitted to making alts, the relevant thread is still viewable.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/141s6wAyJR/you-were-all-right-about-epic-in/c/
You should change your name from Impossible to IMAX for that level of projection. Not that it would matter as your paranoia is that high you jump at every shadow thinking it's ConPro/stormfags/stormcucks/women/etc
Multiple different users have explained multiples times in different ways why they downvote you. Be it reflexive based simply on the user handle of the post, or because of your downright schizophrenic takes that are so far from reality that even someone on an acid trip would question things. You still ignore these so you can continue to whine about it despite also previously claiming you don't care about it.
Now I feel less bad.
this. faggot is a faggot ignoring historical context.
in 1500s england, women and non-whites were not allowed to perform at all.
today, it's only slightly shifted... women are allowed to perform only if they have sex with a producer/director, and non-jews are allowed to perform only if their manager or agent is jewish.
Women yes.
Non-whites? That term didn't even existed in England. "Moors", I suppose they could have been allowed to preform... if there existed any in England, but there wouldn't have been. Same with muslims. It wouldn't have made sense. They wouldn't have needed to restrict any, because there wouldn't have BEEN any.
they already knew of moors as the moors had ruled over spain. so yeah, non-whites.
I didn't say they didn't know what moors were, that's what Othello was about.
I'm saying they wouldn't have had any moors. Again, non-whites would not have been a concept, because 'white' wasn't a concept. For the most part, that's an American anachronism that can't be adopted to Europe, let alone high medieval Europe.
You could have stopped after the second line, the rest is pure tinfoil. MeToo wasn't real.
Me Too was a political move by which some whores in Hollywood used the fact that whoring yourself out is an effective way to advance your Hollywood career as a tool to replace the old Hollywood elite with themselves.
Yes, exactly. Women used MeToo to make their fictional "rape culture" look real and seize power over the instruments of propaganda that they need to dehumanize men.
The thing that wasn't fictional about it was the way that sex is a currency in tinsel town. I know plenty of film workers, including a few who are mildly based. Everyone knows that the fast way to the top is to find a producer, director, or star who's ssxually attracted to your sex, and go down on them.
I was gonna say, this is not the own he was thinking he would make.
I actually thought he was going to say, "I was concerned about doing the play, but I realized it would be about a heterosexual white couple, and I was afraid the actors would be attacked during the play."
And even then, the men knew they were only acting as women.
Narrator: In reality, the play has an 11 year tranny sucking their own dick live on stage
What is ts shit? Nobody thinks banning kiddie drag shows will eliminate Shakespeare.
Unless I'm wrong. I shouldn't be wrong. There is nothing in these new laws that would suggest I'm wrong. The only conclusion is that people like OP want it to be true. Why? Because they view "the arts" as carte blanche for any behavior; in this case exposing children to drag (or burlesques or whatever they call strippers these days).
I love Shakespeare; these folks hate him. That is why they attach the idea of an actor wearing a mask to to a drag queen gyrating for children.
Edit: I kinda regret the previous line: "Nobody thinks banning kiddie drag shows will eliminate Shakespeare." Its the same thing progressives say, but I'm not lying.
Even if the law overreached, it's still their fault. Freedom and responsibility go hand-in-hand. It's not possible to write a perfect law or policy, let alone enforce it. Nevertheless, some things have to be stopped. Demonic pedophile clowns is definitely one of those things. If people can't make the decision to expel those creatures on their own, then it will have to be by force, and the first stage of force is legal force.
The problem is that they think we're like them. They think we'll re-define "adult cabaret entertainment" to include wearing a pink shirt, or having a lezbo buzz cut.
They can't imagine that we actually mean what we are saying, and actually are trying to use a consistent definition.
The religious right of the 90s was a double-edged sword. Knowing people who had Pokemon and Yugioh cards destroyed because of the satanic panic, while some of the degen shit has come to life, idk if there would be as much degen shit if not for people reflexively going against the religious right of the 90s.
I almost wonder if the Evangelist movement wsa the result of Boomers going into a kind of 'religious woke' moment. They and the Greatest Generation were always quite unthinkingly authoritarian; and never really had the capacity to make any religious, theological, or metaphysical Christian arguments that made any sense.
They're making shit up like normal. Just like when they claimed that the word gay would be banned in classrooms.
No, you can't tell the children about how you sucked dick in the parking lot because you are "authentically queer". This is not the same as "banning the word gay".
You absolutely fucking retard.
This person has not read his plays.
I hope the lawyer at least is smart and rips the fuck out of her with a nice fat consulting fee.
Should have banned theatres decades ago, they are a breeding ground for some of the worst most out of touch parasitic people, and as usual incredibly pretentious as demonstrated here, they think their ''art'' is something revolutionary when in fact 9 times out of 10 it's worthless garbage which only poisons society. As are most of the arts, which is why you should always keep an eye on them, but theatre people for some reason tend to be the worst.
This is why they had to make these laws. You can't just cry you can't do a thing that has been done for hundreds of years and then immediately proceed to admit you wanted to alter it to make it more degenerate. Zero fucking self awareness or consistency. They always cry about injustice while trying to take as much as they can without ever being satisfied. If they cared about portraying this play accurately they wouldn't have made this post.
interior semiotics was more coherent.