And that something about living by water turns people into democrats.
Aside from the complete mess in Arizona and New Mexico, almost every other blue county is adjacent to the Pacific or Atlantic Ocean or the Great Lakes.
It's almost entirely due to how the ports increase trading traffic, which ends up with denser cities and more immigration (both legal and illegal). Etc etc. You can see similar trends going back to ancient civilizations. Only instead of necessarily being "leftist" back then they were certainly metropolitan, which often produced similar levels of regressive culture and government.
I quite agree. As many negative elements as they tend to attract, without them any kind of practical progress or advancement in a society would grind to a halt.
Although admittedly, the Internet does at least offer alternative avenues for free trade of ideas and knowledge, actual goods and resources are still going to be largely port for quite a while, regardless of whether or not we're heavily dependent on foreign produced goods. There's just some resources that we may not be able to acquire from more local regions.
New Mexico has a lot of Indian reservations, so that part makes sense. Arizona would be a lot redder if they had honest elections. I'd be curious to see what Kemp and his butt buddy Raffensperger did to Georgia's map, but for some reason the thumbnail image isn't on the linked webpage.
And that something about living by water turns people into democrats.
Democrats dominate big cities. Most big cities are on the coasts. Interior and rural areas are overwhelmingly Red except for big cities that usually serve as transportation hubs.
And that something about living by water turns people into democrats.
Aside from the complete mess in Arizona and New Mexico, almost every other blue county is adjacent to the Pacific or Atlantic Ocean or the Great Lakes.
It's almost entirely due to how the ports increase trading traffic, which ends up with denser cities and more immigration (both legal and illegal). Etc etc. You can see similar trends going back to ancient civilizations. Only instead of necessarily being "leftist" back then they were certainly metropolitan, which often produced similar levels of regressive culture and government.
I quite agree. As many negative elements as they tend to attract, without them any kind of practical progress or advancement in a society would grind to a halt.
Although admittedly, the Internet does at least offer alternative avenues for free trade of ideas and knowledge, actual goods and resources are still going to be largely port for quite a while, regardless of whether or not we're heavily dependent on foreign produced goods. There's just some resources that we may not be able to acquire from more local regions.
So basically more Jews
And, for entirely unrelated reasons, open gates.
New Mexico has a lot of Indian reservations, so that part makes sense. Arizona would be a lot redder if they had honest elections. I'd be curious to see what Kemp and his butt buddy Raffensperger did to Georgia's map, but for some reason the thumbnail image isn't on the linked webpage.
Democrats dominate big cities. Most big cities are on the coasts. Interior and rural areas are overwhelmingly Red except for big cities that usually serve as transportation hubs.
They're putting chemicals in the water