For some reason, the US doesn't do that. I'm not aware of any legal steps to revoke perjury for women, but then, that's not how socialists work, is it?
The law will stay exactly as it is, but the prosecutor will be picked to ensure that the correct agenda is followed.
So not only did the DNC sit on this accusation for months until it was politically convenient to to have a trial of public opinion on the man and try and ruin his career, but it was all based on a lie?
I am absolutely shocked! Also reminds me of Russiagate
So... She committed perjury in an attempt to harm a judicial official, specifically for political reasons of harming her country... So treason, perjury, possibly terrorism depending on if you believe she wished to "spread the message that people rape all the time", which would be attempting to inspire terror in the populace for political purposes...
When's she at least getting the mildest slap on the wrist in the world? Not even that? Oh.
At this point, it's clear that more than half, if not more than 3/4, of all rape accusations are pure bullshit. Outside of prisons, at least.
It's too easy to accuse someone, too hard to prove innocence, too damning repercussions for the accused, and too few consequences for false accusations. No wonder women abuse the hell out of it.
This wasn't his main accuser Christine Blasey Ford, it was one of his several "side" accusers who never became prominent because they were all non-credible from the start and nobody believed them.
Christine Blasey Ford was unique because even though she was also full of shit, unlike the others she could actually put herself credibly in the same physical location as Kavanuagh, so the Democrats, after initially deciding to not use her because of her poor credibility, were forced to go all-in after some staffer leaked her accusation and the media went apeshit over it.
Christine Blasey Ford is a liberal partisan feminist extremist, and had planned this for many years. She tracked Kavanuagh's career and noted his DC Appellate Court appointment, then, knowing he was a USSC short lister, began to set up her claims after that with self serving statements to her therapist.
Christine Blasey Ford was a liar, and ultimately the American people sided against her. Her very existence did great damage to the whole "believe all women" movement, second only to Amber Heard, probably.
so when's her trial for perjury?
Never, because she's a woman and women are wonderful.
For some reason, the US doesn't do that. I'm not aware of any legal steps to revoke perjury for women, but then, that's not how socialists work, is it?
The law will stay exactly as it is, but the prosecutor will be picked to ensure that the correct agenda is followed.
It was Christine Blasey Ford who testified, not Judy Munro-Leighton whom the article is written about.
So not only did the DNC sit on this accusation for months until it was politically convenient to to have a trial of public opinion on the man and try and ruin his career, but it was all based on a lie?
I am absolutely shocked! Also reminds me of Russiagate
Also didn’t that feminist group storm the capital and get in the faces of senators?
yes, they also attacked the supreme court.
neither was called an "insurrection", and all parties involved were given nuisance charges, if at all, and shuffled off.
So... She committed perjury in an attempt to harm a judicial official, specifically for political reasons of harming her country... So treason, perjury, possibly terrorism depending on if you believe she wished to "spread the message that people rape all the time", which would be attempting to inspire terror in the populace for political purposes...
When's she at least getting the mildest slap on the wrist in the world? Not even that? Oh.
islamic countries would have at least give her a good caning. 20 hits.
Everyone already knew this.
Correcting this requires every politician and public figure who knowingly amplified false claims be thrown in prison.
This story broke in 2018: https://news.yahoo.com/kavanaugh-accuser-admits-she-fabricated-184414094.html
Judy Munro-Leighton was a minor accuser and her claims weren't presented to the Senate, so this isn't a big story.
its like that matress girl.. made it up and just said that she was bringing awareness even if she lied lol.
What infuriates me about this isn't just the lie or the attempt to bring down an innocent man.
What infuriates me is that this fucking lie will make it that much harder to believe women who were ACTUALLY FUCKING RAPED.
At this point, it's clear that more than half, if not more than 3/4, of all rape accusations are pure bullshit. Outside of prisons, at least.
It's too easy to accuse someone, too hard to prove innocence, too damning repercussions for the accused, and too few consequences for false accusations. No wonder women abuse the hell out of it.
She and everyone that went along with her scam should all be in jail. For life.
This wasn't his main accuser Christine Blasey Ford, it was one of his several "side" accusers who never became prominent because they were all non-credible from the start and nobody believed them.
Christine Blasey Ford was unique because even though she was also full of shit, unlike the others she could actually put herself credibly in the same physical location as Kavanuagh, so the Democrats, after initially deciding to not use her because of her poor credibility, were forced to go all-in after some staffer leaked her accusation and the media went apeshit over it.
Christine Blasey Ford is a liberal partisan feminist extremist, and had planned this for many years. She tracked Kavanuagh's career and noted his DC Appellate Court appointment, then, knowing he was a USSC short lister, began to set up her claims after that with self serving statements to her therapist.
Christine Blasey Ford was a liar, and ultimately the American people sided against her. Her very existence did great damage to the whole "believe all women" movement, second only to Amber Heard, probably.