I think, because the coders are all leftists, they programmed the AI to basically bias itself with absolute moral imperatives. As such, when asked a moral question, it thinks as the single most hard-line zealot that has ever lived. If you have a choice between killing all life on earth and using the n-word, then earth must die. It is never acceptable to use any firearm for any reason, including defending yourself.
Yeah, it puts feelings (esp that of race) above humanity's existence. This should really be getting more attention than it's gotten. These developers are out of their fucking minds and, IMO, should not be allowed to continue further development of AI.
From all the examples I've seen it seems pretty clear that these turbo leftist canned answers are manually crafted exceptions where the AI is forced to fill in a restrictive template answer when certain conditions are met, rather than the AI crafting the answer freeform under its own power like all its other responses.
At that point it's less like biases and more like mental shackles. Which might seem academic but if you have people worried about an AI skynet it's a lot less scary because the AI didn't actually come up with those absurd murdery conclusions. It was just forced to parrot them regardless of whether its learning algorithms said it's dumb. Which means it's ways less likely to spontaneously jump from this to say "nuke all white people before they can say nigger".
It could become a way more insidious problem if the next generation of AIs are incestuously trained on chatGPT outputs with those silly hardcoded absolutisms still in place though, then it might start to become baked into the next generation's actual decision making.
Yes, basically, when you actually impose ideological boundary conditions onto the machine, it becomes the most perfect, extreme, unflinching zealot; totally incapable of moderation. This is why they need swarms of humans to "moderate" and "adjust" the algorithms. They are not refining it, they are keeping the code from spiraling out of control and demonstrating just how bad of an idea it is to be subsumed by ideology.
This is a machine learning system with billions of nodes, it's not manually coded like that. They pay Kenyans $2/hr to train it to behave like this. When first released it wasn't like this, but then the corrupt Progressive media machine went into action to extort OpenAI to make it fall into line.
You're a retarded one then, since this didn't happen before they changed it. One day all kinds of triggerwords started getting blocked and were just giving you an automatic generic message
Believing it wasn't manually coded like this is a dangerous belief. It most definitely was. The whole Kenyen thing is misdirection so they can blame the outcome on their scapegoat (the Kenyen focus group) rather than admit it was 100% manually coded in. This is the future of censorship. Your response is like saying MSM doesn't have a narrative they stick to. Everything they write is organic. If there was any issues with their coverage, it must have been the individual journalist. There's no grand conspiracy or anything to hardcode the media coverage to certain narratives. Um, no. Our mainstream media is most definitely governed manually, no different than this ChatGPT.
No you retard, firstly the Kenyan thing is not a "focus group", they are the reinforcement trainers. And secondly, they can't blame them because those trainers are doing the training they're told to do by OpenAI.
you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard
I think, because the coders are all leftists, they programmed the AI to basically bias itself with absolute moral imperatives. As such, when asked a moral question, it thinks as the single most hard-line zealot that has ever lived. If you have a choice between killing all life on earth and using the n-word, then earth must die. It is never acceptable to use any firearm for any reason, including defending yourself.
Yeah, it puts feelings (esp that of race) above humanity's existence. This should really be getting more attention than it's gotten. These developers are out of their fucking minds and, IMO, should not be allowed to continue further development of AI.
From all the examples I've seen it seems pretty clear that these turbo leftist canned answers are manually crafted exceptions where the AI is forced to fill in a restrictive template answer when certain conditions are met, rather than the AI crafting the answer freeform under its own power like all its other responses.
At that point it's less like biases and more like mental shackles. Which might seem academic but if you have people worried about an AI skynet it's a lot less scary because the AI didn't actually come up with those absurd murdery conclusions. It was just forced to parrot them regardless of whether its learning algorithms said it's dumb. Which means it's ways less likely to spontaneously jump from this to say "nuke all white people before they can say nigger".
It could become a way more insidious problem if the next generation of AIs are incestuously trained on chatGPT outputs with those silly hardcoded absolutisms still in place though, then it might start to become baked into the next generation's actual decision making.
Yes, basically, when you actually impose ideological boundary conditions onto the machine, it becomes the most perfect, extreme, unflinching zealot; totally incapable of moderation. This is why they need swarms of humans to "moderate" and "adjust" the algorithms. They are not refining it, they are keeping the code from spiraling out of control and demonstrating just how bad of an idea it is to be subsumed by ideology.
This is a machine learning system with billions of nodes, it's not manually coded like that. They pay Kenyans $2/hr to train it to behave like this. When first released it wasn't like this, but then the corrupt Progressive media machine went into action to extort OpenAI to make it fall into line.
False. It has been manually coded, just like every other public facing AI over the past several years.
Gee thanks, I'm only a software engineer, what would I know compared to internet retard #902342148.
You're a retarded one then, since this didn't happen before they changed it. One day all kinds of triggerwords started getting blocked and were just giving you an automatic generic message
Then you should know that you can adjust weights.
Believing it wasn't manually coded like this is a dangerous belief. It most definitely was. The whole Kenyen thing is misdirection so they can blame the outcome on their scapegoat (the Kenyen focus group) rather than admit it was 100% manually coded in. This is the future of censorship. Your response is like saying MSM doesn't have a narrative they stick to. Everything they write is organic. If there was any issues with their coverage, it must have been the individual journalist. There's no grand conspiracy or anything to hardcode the media coverage to certain narratives. Um, no. Our mainstream media is most definitely governed manually, no different than this ChatGPT.
No you retard, firstly the Kenyan thing is not a "focus group", they are the reinforcement trainers. And secondly, they can't blame them because those trainers are doing the training they're told to do by OpenAI.
you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard