This is absolutely the result of a feminist orientation.
Letting gay or lesbian couples adopt children is a really bad idea, for the usual reasons. Lesbians, especially the ones driven by ideology, which is to say most lesbians, are massively confused about their relationships to children because they question the whole premise of womanhood and reject childbearing as something slavish and motherhood as "patriarchal."
Would they have done this had they adopted a girl? Would they even consider adopting a girl when it may be that their plan all along was to get hold of a helpless boy and torture him to death?
Evil is depressing. Totalitarian evil like feminism is horrifying, especially since there appears to be no stopping it.
Wanna bet he will now furiously masturbate about Argentina's politics personally betraying him? After claiming that of Korea, Hungary, Lithuania, and basically half the countries of the world? Because he is personally connected to EVERY MALE EVER.
The TRAITOR PRESIDENT of Argentina is trying to make sure that his people don't go extinct, by bribing our Worse Halves into having children. Negotiating with TERRORISTS.
Men are denying themselves to women. WE ARE WINNING! Haha, womens! You're not getting this dick! Die mad about it, genocide pushers!
He BETRAYED me though. I do not forget. I do not forgive. When you throw in your lot with the women, Antonio will chase you to the gates of HELL! And we will prevail. How, I don't know, since men are only 49% of the population and many of them are TRAITORS, but I am sure of it! Maybe when the 90% death rate from the vaccine kicks in.
I don't know if he has a handler. Stop trying to make me sound ridiculous. He may just be bribed and blackmailed by women, like Ron DeSantis.
I dunno man, Imp might be batshit but when all the info you have is "two feminist activist lesbians raped a boy in their care with dildos and beat him to death", starting with misandry as an initial presumed motive seems like a pretty fair assessment just on the balance of probability.
They're a pretty distinct group and being a feminist activist is a choice not an immutable characteristic so it is evidence of their character and mental state, hell within that subdemographic it's kind of ambiguous for many of them how much even being a lesbian isn't more of a conscientious objection than a sexual orientation. The onus at that point should probably be on proving that, contrary to the rest of their behaviour, that murder wasn't at least mostly motivated by man hating.
but when all the info you have is "two feminist activist lesbians raped a boy in their care with dildos and beat him to death", starting with misandry as an initial presumed motive seems like a pretty fair assessment just on the balance of probability.
See, you brought reason and probability into it. And I would agree with that. It's rather suspicious, although abuse occurs everywhere and it's not proof positive. My issue with the Imp is that he claims to know with certainty, not probability, what the cause of this is.
And that this 'shows' that feminism is about murdering boys, or whatever. That's obviously false, because not only has a connection not been demonstrated, there are many feminists who raise boys, and in fact, spoil them to such an extent that they become rotten to the core.
They're a pretty distinct group and being a feminist activist is a choice not an immutable characteristic so it is evidence of their character and mental state
Definitely. It sheds some light on their conduct, but it's by no means the end of the story. And I hate that it now sounds like I'm defending either these murderers or feminism in general.
The onus at that point should probably be on proving that, contrary to the rest of their behaviour, that murder wasn't at least mostly motivated by man hating.
And here again, I wouldn't even object to this statement. If you claimed to know with complete or near-complete certainty, on the other hand, I would take issue with that.
All gender should be removed from custody fights and only thing that should be considered is who would raise the child better.
We'd probably see a huge increase in single dad's if we did that and lower child abuse if women couldn't pull the birth card for an advantage in courts.
It is consistent with lesbian abuse rates. There was that statistic about a child being raised by 2 moms and it had something like 23% abuse rate. Unfortunately it did not brake it down further between if the child was a boy or a girl. I have a strong suspicion that the percentage of boys abused by lesbian is a lot higher.
No, it's just a fact. Single mother raised boys turn out violent because of the abuse inflicted on them as a proxy for the partner who left.
No, boys raised by single mothers are violent because a woman alone cannot control a boy. You're as dumb as it gets with your 'abuse' fantasies.
That's such a weird deflection.
It is? It's like being surprised that hospital employees are most likely to kill those admitted to hospitals and not malicious clowns.
It took me so long to find this. I posted it here over a year ago, under a strange title.
I thought surely you weren't talking about that. Because you claimed that they were investigating why 'women love killing kids'. This ain't it. And it shows that at least 40% of infants killed are girls, which I'm sure you'll claim is made up to hide the GENOCIDE against boys.
Because knives and guns equalize the field somewhat, especially if you're not expecting it.
lol, didn't our genius say that women should be stripped of their Second Amendment rights?
That just sounds like a woman-led academic study's excuse. Men are not naturally violent.
Wut? Are you denying human nature now? Are men more or less violent than women, by nature?
No, it's not.
Good counterargument, loony troon.
"There should be more research into whether women consider a male baby more other to them" sounds like a pretty strong indictment.
Considering that the numbers of women murdering infants (at least if it's their own baby) are tiny, it doesn't really say anything about women in general. There may be disturbed women, perhaps the victims of rape, who act out against the entire male sex like you do against the entire female sex.
I stand by it.
See, stripping people of their 2nd Amendment rights is not very popular here, so that is one of the reasons why you are so despised.
This is absolutely the result of a feminist orientation.
Letting gay or lesbian couples adopt children is a really bad idea, for the usual reasons. Lesbians, especially the ones driven by ideology, which is to say most lesbians, are massively confused about their relationships to children because they question the whole premise of womanhood and reject childbearing as something slavish and motherhood as "patriarchal."
Would they have done this had they adopted a girl? Would they even consider adopting a girl when it may be that their plan all along was to get hold of a helpless boy and torture him to death?
Evil is depressing. Totalitarian evil like feminism is horrifying, especially since there appears to be no stopping it.
Yes, because it's rhetorical.
No one here likes feminism, but if you want to claim that there was a connection between the ideology and the abuse, you have to demonstrate it.
Wanna bet he will now furiously masturbate about Argentina's politics personally betraying him? After claiming that of Korea, Hungary, Lithuania, and basically half the countries of the world? Because he is personally connected to EVERY MALE EVER.
The TRAITOR PRESIDENT of Argentina is trying to make sure that his people don't go extinct, by bribing our Worse Halves into having children. Negotiating with TERRORISTS.
Men are denying themselves to women. WE ARE WINNING! Haha, womens! You're not getting this dick! Die mad about it, genocide pushers!
No, it's not him. It's his female handler. No man ever does bad, it's some secret woman handler doing it, he is just a puppet.
He BETRAYED me though. I do not forget. I do not forgive. When you throw in your lot with the women, Antonio will chase you to the gates of HELL! And we will prevail. How, I don't know, since men are only 49% of the population and many of them are TRAITORS, but I am sure of it! Maybe when the 90% death rate from the vaccine kicks in.
I don't know if he has a handler. Stop trying to make me sound ridiculous. He may just be bribed and blackmailed by women, like Ron DeSantis.
How are you going to win, when 51% by definition disagree with your hatred for women and many men are TRAITORS, Don Quixote?
More sweeping judgments about a country you have never even visited?
Budapest is by far more pleasant than any American city. And inflation results from energy prices, not from your delusions.
It is known, Khaleesi.
Yes, because prices rise everywhere, genius.
Said the Murican. LOL!
You are mad that a woman was murdered?
Greater dependence on Russian energy.
Dude, it's impossible to talk to you, and you've ceased being entertaining in this conversation, so I'm getting out.
Exclusively.
What, so you're going the BLM route pioneered by women? Any white who does anything to a black is motivated by racism?
I dunno man, Imp might be batshit but when all the info you have is "two feminist activist lesbians raped a boy in their care with dildos and beat him to death", starting with misandry as an initial presumed motive seems like a pretty fair assessment just on the balance of probability.
They're a pretty distinct group and being a feminist activist is a choice not an immutable characteristic so it is evidence of their character and mental state, hell within that subdemographic it's kind of ambiguous for many of them how much even being a lesbian isn't more of a conscientious objection than a sexual orientation. The onus at that point should probably be on proving that, contrary to the rest of their behaviour, that murder wasn't at least mostly motivated by man hating.
See, you brought reason and probability into it. And I would agree with that. It's rather suspicious, although abuse occurs everywhere and it's not proof positive. My issue with the Imp is that he claims to know with certainty, not probability, what the cause of this is.
And that this 'shows' that feminism is about murdering boys, or whatever. That's obviously false, because not only has a connection not been demonstrated, there are many feminists who raise boys, and in fact, spoil them to such an extent that they become rotten to the core.
Definitely. It sheds some light on their conduct, but it's by no means the end of the story. And I hate that it now sounds like I'm defending either these murderers or feminism in general.
And here again, I wouldn't even object to this statement. If you claimed to know with complete or near-complete certainty, on the other hand, I would take issue with that.
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Post Approved: This doesn't violate that rule.
All gender should be removed from custody fights and only thing that should be considered is who would raise the child better.
We'd probably see a huge increase in single dad's if we did that and lower child abuse if women couldn't pull the birth card for an advantage in courts.
It is consistent with lesbian abuse rates. There was that statistic about a child being raised by 2 moms and it had something like 23% abuse rate. Unfortunately it did not brake it down further between if the child was a boy or a girl. I have a strong suspicion that the percentage of boys abused by lesbian is a lot higher.
Most murders are committed by... men.
Men; they really reach depths of humanity thought unheard of (pls no R16 mods, I'm making fun of him).
There you go again, your "Hitler's mother is to blame" excuse.
Doesn't really surprise me, since they do most of childcare.
Can you show me those academic papers?
So why are you so terrified of women murdering you? You claim to be 6'5" but you're deathly afraid of women.
No, boys raised by single mothers are violent because a woman alone cannot control a boy. You're as dumb as it gets with your 'abuse' fantasies.
It is? It's like being surprised that hospital employees are most likely to kill those admitted to hospitals and not malicious clowns.
I thought surely you weren't talking about that. Because you claimed that they were investigating why 'women love killing kids'. This ain't it. And it shows that at least 40% of infants killed are girls, which I'm sure you'll claim is made up to hide the GENOCIDE against boys.
lol, didn't our genius say that women should be stripped of their Second Amendment rights?
Wut? Are you denying human nature now? Are men more or less violent than women, by nature?
Good counterargument, loony troon.
Considering that the numbers of women murdering infants (at least if it's their own baby) are tiny, it doesn't really say anything about women in general. There may be disturbed women, perhaps the victims of rape, who act out against the entire male sex like you do against the entire female sex.
See, stripping people of their 2nd Amendment rights is not very popular here, so that is one of the reasons why you are so despised.