Projecting stuff on someone else's property is not "first amendment". What is First Amendment, though, is that you can't treat some forms of speech as disfavored compared to others.
So knock off the professional victim act. I know Republicans are bad. Your ravings are stupid though.
The projection of light is a common method of speech. I guess you could argue that just as you may yell but you may not use a bullhorn, the method of projection matters. it seems to me as an unregulatable thing. Unless you're going to argue it's light pollution.
But what property right of yours are they violating? You don't generally get to stop people from generating light. Like I said, concept of pollution aside.
Projecting stuff on someone else's property is not "first amendment". What is First Amendment, though, is that you can't treat some forms of speech as disfavored compared to others.
So knock off the professional victim act. I know Republicans are bad. Your ravings are stupid though.
Putting them in public places is.
I only see this bill disfavoring one form of speech against one specific group. Shouldn't you be against that, based on your own words?
he's european, he hasn't got the luxury of principles.
He's also a leftist, a sodomite and a vaxx pusher.
Chill, you already said he was a leftist.
Well, duh. What do you think what you quoted even meant?
That said, can you quote where only speech against 'one specific group' is disfavored? That would be even more unconstitutional than this already is.
Well every time I say anything bad about jews I get banned. Whites? That's fine. Blacks? Banned.
Ahh lovely free speech
Oh do you? I'm sure that's a totally correct retelling of what actually happened.
You can't be this low on self-awareness.
He isn't, he knows he's a lying hypocrite and he likes it.
I know the 'Evil Juice' crowd isn't very bright, but just go ahead and read what you quoted again.
Because apparently, you didn't understand that it was a statement in opposition to this law.
Also, the law says nothing about the Evil Juice. It covers race and religion. Democrats could push the exact same bill and say it protects blakcs.
God damn you went full retard, huh?
Do you think projecting texts on someone else's property is 'free speech'?
Then you may just be the retard.
The projection of light is a common method of speech. I guess you could argue that just as you may yell but you may not use a bullhorn, the method of projection matters. it seems to me as an unregulatable thing. Unless you're going to argue it's light pollution.
On public property, sure. On my property? No way!
But what property right of yours are they violating? You don't generally get to stop people from generating light. Like I said, concept of pollution aside.
Maybe someone doesn't want his property to be used for messages he doesn't like, whether it is "Jews are awful" or "Jews are cool".