Sexual assaults in families with LGBTQ parents
(notthebee.com)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
The article from notthebee is not exactly without bias.
The first major thing is that forced sex are higher then touched sexually. In fact touched sexually with a gay dad is only 6%. Still 3 times higher then straight couples but not as bad as lesbians - 23%
Not sure what the hell do lesbians do but it seems very messed up.
Does not say anything about being the parent. And it is almost the same between adopted couples and gay dad (I assume also adopted the kid). Again lesbians are the worse.
Honestly there should be a national push against lesbians adopting - despite being women.
I wonder what Matt Walsh would say about this.
It really should be me that does it. Calling out TERFs as subhuman genocidal scum is my thing.
-3 already, I just have hit a nerve by posting it.
It's almost like an ideology built around hate shouldn't be anywhere near children.
Given he did a ninety minute "documentary" on tranny ideology without mentioning the SCUM Manifesto, I think he'd be helping women bury it.
Banning the psycho cat ladies is our foot in the door.
Strategically, it can be very beneficial to target one group at a time. Boil the frog, if you will.
Not really, I was more pointing towards Matt Walsh saying that he would not trust men to watch his kids but he would trust women.
Well of course this is the case, as many gay people admit, they are not embracing natural social norms now that they don't have to hide being gay and still holding onto the ones that existed before, along with it's degeneracy...
Including the fact that straight couples can just HAVE kids, there's no need for a middle man, there might not be the biological connection normal couples have with their children which makes this abuse more prevalent in LGBTwhatever parents, maybe not bi as much since they can just be in normal relationships.
Not all LGBT folk are pedophiles, but, all pedophiles are part of the LGBT.
I honestly think that is a gross exaggeration. I do think they are overrepresented by a lot more then statistics show.
You basically have the same dynamic going on as with black crime. Every single academic wants to cover up this stuff, explain it away, massage the numbers, make excuses, but nothing is going to completely erase the fact that these people commit these offenses at 10-20x the rate of normal people.
It's retroactively true, because they'll eventually push to add a P to the end of that acronym.
Sexual deviations are behaving like...... sexual deviants. Shocking news at 13 'o clock.
I think super religious and super gay families have the most molestations.. one because of super strictness and lack of sex. The other is because of degeneracy leads to more degeneracy.
it's amazing how many problems would be solved if people would just beat their meat in private and get on with their lives.
The real interesting implications are about women.
23% of children raised in lesbian homes were raped as kids.
If there's so much child rape by lesbians, it follows that straight women must be hugely under-reported as pedophiles compared to reality.
So much so that they are the real majority! - which follows with prominent feminists being pro-pedo and Balenciaga being pro-woman.
The long suggested statistical manipulation in favor of women might have finally been proven.
Check my comment, the true outline are the lesbians. Insanely high abuse rates.
The suicide rates are interesting, but I think the far higher male suicide rate is why that's such a discrepancy.
Lesbians want girls - unless they're going to murder it, many such cases.
Straight people get what they are given.
Gays usually want boys, because they don't want to raise a girl with no mother or something like that.
Whether it's because the women pimp them out or because the women are doing it isn't really relevant.
It still boils down to being the women's fault.
I think that was sexually touched by the parents.
There are reasons children do much better when raised by the father.
No, it doesn't, any more than "women must be oppressed" follows "women earn less money on average than men" does.
that number is way higher than I thought it would be, and is alone shocking. The numbers flanking it, on the other hand, is downright horrifying.
maybe I'm retarded, can anyone get to the original studies that were conducted from their website? I can see the graphs plainly but I can't find anything about methodology or scope.
It's based on multiple studies compiled over the years. You can view them all here on the summary page: http://www.familystructurestudies.com/summary
EDIT: Hmm, looks like a lot of the articles attached to those studies were conveniently removed, but you can still access the PDF about the lesbian/gay child abuse statistics here : https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/nis4_report_exec_summ_pdf_jan2010.pdf