He's acting like men are some kind of unpredictable stupid animal, like a male gorilla or cat killing its offspring because that's just what the males of the species do. (female gorillas kill their offspring too actually...)
The liberal orthodoxy here is the refusal to blame this on "gay activist couples" adopting children. I'm kind of surprised Walsh went a different route. Conservatives used to be against gays adopting children at all.
At the very least he implies that women are totally fine to babysit his kids though. If he's just trusting women blindly he's setting himself up to get snakebit.
Walsh is mostly correct. I wouldn't want any man or woman not related or who I'm not extremely close to watch any kid I'm related to. I mean you can be mad about it or just acknowledge reality.
Look at the tweet and what he's replying to though. Let's assume what you're right - you'd be perfectly within reason to trust your kids with a strange woman more than a strange man - what does that have to do with that news story?
Why does Matt Walsh feel the need to associate a couple of perverted gay activists with normal men?
Would you like a non-family related black female babysit your kid or a white male?
Depends. Sharon Jones, yes. Chahknequuh Blaq, no.
He's acting like men are some kind of unpredictable stupid animal, like a male gorilla or cat killing its offspring because that's just what the males of the species do. (female gorillas kill their offspring too actually...)
The liberal orthodoxy here is the refusal to blame this on "gay activist couples" adopting children. I'm kind of surprised Walsh went a different route. Conservatives used to be against gays adopting children at all.
Matt Walsh is the proverbial broken clock. Wrong 86,398 seconds a day.
That's a nice take on the old saying.
At the very least he implies that women are totally fine to babysit his kids though. If he's just trusting women blindly he's setting himself up to get snakebit.
Reminder that Matt Walsh is jewish
Walsh is mostly correct. I wouldn't want any man or woman not related or who I'm not extremely close to watch any kid I'm related to. I mean you can be mad about it or just acknowledge reality.
Apparently he would let a woman babysit his kids.
Men are more likely to sexually abuse kids.
This is a retarded take to get offended at
It doesn’t mean ALL MEN are automatic predators.
Listen, not all black men are violent. But I’m simply not taking my chances with Tyrone in my home
Look at the tweet and what he's replying to though. Let's assume what you're right - you'd be perfectly within reason to trust your kids with a strange woman more than a strange man - what does that have to do with that news story?
Why does Matt Walsh feel the need to associate a couple of perverted gay activists with normal men?
Pretty sure women abuse kids more than men do.
It’s been hard to find data on it. But we are talking about sexual abuse, right ?
I don’t deny women sexually abuse kids. But your internal instincts should place strange men at the bottom of the pile when it comes to sexual abuse
That's why I said mostly
It’s not feminist propaganda. It’s reality
More men are sexual predators than women. It’s that fucking simple.
Been that way since the 60s as per the book Why Men Are the Way They Are.