One thing women and feminists are great at its creating incredibly retarded scenarios to justify their beliefs, done by limiting one factor so significantly it forces the result you want (here its the time frame, wherein one week versus one year would change nothing for losing men, but have a massive difference losing women on many men/children).
Here we see one in action from the absolute big brains at Men's Rights, the controlled opposition of the "manosphere" world who have been circle jerking for over a decade to little result because they think "just copy everything Feminism did" is a strategy that can work. Such as writing dumb shit like this and then celebrating about how clever they are.
They were a joke 10 years ago and are still equally pathetic, even from someone like me who hates women more than Imp ever could and has spent his life on the "Men's Rights" train.
Here we see one in action from the absolute big brains at Men's Rights, the controlled opposition of the "manosphere" world who have been circle jerking for over a decade to little result because they think "just copy everything Feminism did" is a strategy that can work.
That's the January 6 fallacy. "If they can burn down half the country, and get their way, surely we can engage in some misdemeanor parading".
At least Jan 6 can be considered a one off mistake, brought on by people hyped, rowdy and generally just pissed off.
These guys have spent over a decade there, and some of them even longer, "woke" to the problem. And spent that entire time thinking "we can just one day make people realize how bad it is, then they will obviously fix it because they feel bad for men!" Its the most beta bitch thought process that makes me feel far less sympathy for how many of them got divorce raped to hell (which is the most common reason to end up there).
And spent that entire time thinking "we can just one day make people realize how bad it is, then they will obviously fix it because they feel bad for men!"
People do stuff because it is in their interests, not because they 'feel bad'. So that is pretty stupid. That said, there is little reason to "feel bad for men".
I think there is plenty reason to feel bad, but none of that gives you free reign to sulk, lead others astray and be delusional. But that's a whole essay elsewhere.
But the entire movement of "women's rights" is built upon leveraging men's interest (aka desire to fuck and provide/support instinctually) to get what they wanted. It wasn't won through dominance in a war, it was whined until it was given to them. Something these types of MHRA/MRAs think can work in reverse.
The smarter ones realize they won't get sympathy and instead focus on laws and such. Which can make a dent, but fail to realize that the moment it truly becomes a problem for women it'll be stopped immediately. And that's without factoring in the absurd leeway judges/courts have to just blatantly ignore/interpret laws to their emotional desires (which usually always favor the woman anyway).
I think there is plenty reason to feel bad, but none of that gives you free reign to sulk, lead others astray and be delusional. But that's a whole essay elsewhere.
I feel pretty good. I've heard some stories from people here where you can say that you should feel bad for them, but for men as a class? It's hard to think of any group that's entitled to being felt bad for, except maybe abuse victims or something.
The smarter ones realize they won't get sympathy and instead focus on laws and such. Which can make a dent, but fail to realize that the moment it truly becomes a problem for women it'll be stopped immediately.
That is no unalterable law of nature, it's only because they can bring more power to bear.
And that's without factoring in the absurd leeway judges/courts have to just blatantly ignore/interpret laws to their emotional desires
That is an additional issue. But generally, when the powers that be favor group X, both the laws and the courts will do so. If you manage to change the path of least resistance, both the law and the courts will bend.
I've heard some stories from people here where you can say that you should feel bad for them, but for men as a class?
I do so because while you can be doing just fine, when you aren't you can be in a downward spiral because the level of support available is minimal to zilch. The world doesn't care, the law doesn't, the women don't. If you can't handle it on the chin your options can be literally nothing.
The classic being if your wife wakes up one day and, because the media has filled her head with greener grass and delusions, just decides to take your kids, house and money. You can try to make it amicable, or even fight back, but one word of "he abused me/us" (doesn't need to be true in the slightest) and that's gone too. Your entire life is now a massive uphill struggle where you have nothing, have to work hard to make something, just so you can pay her to maybe use it on your kids and if you fail to do so its jail time.
That's why I feel bad for many. The Western Man is in a precarious position that can be taken away on a whim with little recourse and leaving only the most strong and able able to sustain its weathering.
Here we have a man, who claims women intentionally created Covid that specifically just kills men... but he wants the SAME medical establishment to be responsible for creating his kid from cell 1.
Hell, even if the lab creating your kid would only have men, how would you justify foaming at the mouth because Elon Musk has a sister, when all men have at least some connection with women? Like you can't trust Twitter now because of Elon's sister, but your baby producers can't be 1000% pure either.
You have major freakouts about things, but selectively ignore the huge, actual issues around other things based on nothing but your manic hate of women.
I mean, it's not even up for debate that a woman created it. Even the RINOs agreed.
You always misrepresent me, I've noticed that. I said that Elon's sister was in an industry based heavily around catering to women, so if he took a stand, her business could collapse.
What can they do? Refuse to create children for "misogynists"? Women already do that. Kill the baby and tell us it died? Women already do that too. Use someone else's sperm and lie? Guess what? Women do that!
Then why would it be better from your point of view? You really show it to women that you pay millions and your still won't get a kid. Brilliant. Truly one of our greatest thinkers.
They usually don't but when has that stopped from claiming they represent women that do and they speak 'on their behalf'
They're so vocal and prominent that they assume authority and the few women that tell them they don't speak for them get isolated by their supporters. It's been at least a century of this and so an effective way to possibly change things is to threaten that core position. Just look how much damage the trans push did now they can't have their safe spaces.
Actually it's causing a 'civil war' in the left, was listening to Sargon for new years and had Dankula join him, the SNP are losing voters since the women got pissed off with men in their changing rooms and told their partners don't vote for them
Women who don't have children are far more likely to be feminists. So you would be aiding them.
They'll be fine, if you're only selling point is 'I can give you a baby', you might as well be a surrogate at that point as that's not a relationship, that's a transactional contract. Any other relationship that at least has more to it that 'baby maker' won't be affected.
I have had terrible experiences, but when people ask that, they aren't asking about awful feminist co-workers. They're asking about your romantic life and your relationship with your mother. That's why I said no.
One thing women and feminists are great at its creating incredibly retarded scenarios to justify their beliefs, done by limiting one factor so significantly it forces the result you want (here its the time frame, wherein one week versus one year would change nothing for losing men, but have a massive difference losing women on many men/children).
Here we see one in action from the absolute big brains at Men's Rights, the controlled opposition of the "manosphere" world who have been circle jerking for over a decade to little result because they think "just copy everything Feminism did" is a strategy that can work. Such as writing dumb shit like this and then celebrating about how clever they are.
They were a joke 10 years ago and are still equally pathetic, even from someone like me who hates women more than Imp ever could and has spent his life on the "Men's Rights" train.
That's the January 6 fallacy. "If they can burn down half the country, and get their way, surely we can engage in some misdemeanor parading".
Nay, son.
At least Jan 6 can be considered a one off mistake, brought on by people hyped, rowdy and generally just pissed off.
These guys have spent over a decade there, and some of them even longer, "woke" to the problem. And spent that entire time thinking "we can just one day make people realize how bad it is, then they will obviously fix it because they feel bad for men!" Its the most beta bitch thought process that makes me feel far less sympathy for how many of them got divorce raped to hell (which is the most common reason to end up there).
People do stuff because it is in their interests, not because they 'feel bad'. So that is pretty stupid. That said, there is little reason to "feel bad for men".
I think there is plenty reason to feel bad, but none of that gives you free reign to sulk, lead others astray and be delusional. But that's a whole essay elsewhere.
But the entire movement of "women's rights" is built upon leveraging men's interest (aka desire to fuck and provide/support instinctually) to get what they wanted. It wasn't won through dominance in a war, it was whined until it was given to them. Something these types of MHRA/MRAs think can work in reverse.
The smarter ones realize they won't get sympathy and instead focus on laws and such. Which can make a dent, but fail to realize that the moment it truly becomes a problem for women it'll be stopped immediately. And that's without factoring in the absurd leeway judges/courts have to just blatantly ignore/interpret laws to their emotional desires (which usually always favor the woman anyway).
I feel pretty good. I've heard some stories from people here where you can say that you should feel bad for them, but for men as a class? It's hard to think of any group that's entitled to being felt bad for, except maybe abuse victims or something.
That is no unalterable law of nature, it's only because they can bring more power to bear.
That is an additional issue. But generally, when the powers that be favor group X, both the laws and the courts will do so. If you manage to change the path of least resistance, both the law and the courts will bend.
I do so because while you can be doing just fine, when you aren't you can be in a downward spiral because the level of support available is minimal to zilch. The world doesn't care, the law doesn't, the women don't. If you can't handle it on the chin your options can be literally nothing.
The classic being if your wife wakes up one day and, because the media has filled her head with greener grass and delusions, just decides to take your kids, house and money. You can try to make it amicable, or even fight back, but one word of "he abused me/us" (doesn't need to be true in the slightest) and that's gone too. Your entire life is now a massive uphill struggle where you have nothing, have to work hard to make something, just so you can pay her to maybe use it on your kids and if you fail to do so its jail time.
That's why I feel bad for many. The Western Man is in a precarious position that can be taken away on a whim with little recourse and leaving only the most strong and able able to sustain its weathering.
If you want to end feminism, end the stranglehold they have on access to children due to biology.
But then that opens up 'baby farms' so that's a new horror.
I'm beginning to think if AI do take over, that'd be for the best, less terminator, more "we can't be left by ourselves so we need an AI nanny"
I have talked about this here before; artificial wombs are scary and it should be obvious to everyone here, after three years of medical tyranny.
Yep which is why I for one, welcome our machine overlords
Because everytime they try ANY kind of learning computer, it always ends up based!
Learn to pack boxes.
Here we have a man, who claims women intentionally created Covid that specifically just kills men... but he wants the SAME medical establishment to be responsible for creating his kid from cell 1.
Hell, even if the lab creating your kid would only have men, how would you justify foaming at the mouth because Elon Musk has a sister, when all men have at least some connection with women? Like you can't trust Twitter now because of Elon's sister, but your baby producers can't be 1000% pure either.
You have major freakouts about things, but selectively ignore the huge, actual issues around other things based on nothing but your manic hate of women.
I mean, it's not even up for debate that a woman created it. Even the RINOs agreed.
You always misrepresent me, I've noticed that. I said that Elon's sister was in an industry based heavily around catering to women, so if he took a stand, her business could collapse.
Like I said, learn to pack boxes.
You still refuse to actually think about the thing I said. Do you trust pharma?
Of course I don't. Do I trust women? Even less.
What can they do? Refuse to create children for "misogynists"? Women already do that. Kill the baby and tell us it died? Women already do that too. Use someone else's sperm and lie? Guess what? Women do that!
Then why would it be better from your point of view? You really show it to women that you pay millions and your still won't get a kid. Brilliant. Truly one of our greatest thinkers.
It is time for ice cream.
Ah yes, the Rogue Servitor playstyle from Stellaris.
Feminists don't have children.
They usually don't but when has that stopped from claiming they represent women that do and they speak 'on their behalf'
They're so vocal and prominent that they assume authority and the few women that tell them they don't speak for them get isolated by their supporters. It's been at least a century of this and so an effective way to possibly change things is to threaten that core position. Just look how much damage the trans push did now they can't have their safe spaces.
Well, they also speak on behalf of blacks, so...
Women who don't have children are far more likely to be feminists. So you would be aiding them.
None at all?
Actually it's causing a 'civil war' in the left, was listening to Sargon for new years and had Dankula join him, the SNP are losing voters since the women got pissed off with men in their changing rooms and told their partners don't vote for them
They'll be fine, if you're only selling point is 'I can give you a baby', you might as well be a surrogate at that point as that's not a relationship, that's a transactional contract. Any other relationship that at least has more to it that 'baby maker' won't be affected.
Nothing is a bigger horror than being led by the kind of people I talk about. Nothing.
Here's what I don't get. You claim this, and then you also claim that you have no terrible experiences yourself with women.
I have had terrible experiences, but when people ask that, they aren't asking about awful feminist co-workers. They're asking about your romantic life and your relationship with your mother. That's why I said no.
LOL! You hate women because you... had awful co-workers?
But you just said: Nothing is a bigger horror than being led by the kind of people I talk about. Nothing.
My views are driven by statistics and facts, not unsourced anecdotes.
Because feminists are evil personified. There is nothing they won't do to satisfy their sadism.
I was proven right on Carrie Symonds.
Waiting for the Fauci files to show I was right on Grady as well.
How come your personal experiences showed you otherwise?
OK, what 'facts and statistics' is this based on?
Because I don't put myself into situations where they can harm me.
Their own words, as printed in several mainstream media articles, academic essays and more.