One thing women and feminists are great at its creating incredibly retarded scenarios to justify their beliefs, done by limiting one factor so significantly it forces the result you want (here its the time frame, wherein one week versus one year would change nothing for losing men, but have a massive difference losing women on many men/children).
Here we see one in action from the absolute big brains at Men's Rights, the controlled opposition of the "manosphere" world who have been circle jerking for over a decade to little result because they think "just copy everything Feminism did" is a strategy that can work. Such as writing dumb shit like this and then celebrating about how clever they are.
They were a joke 10 years ago and are still equally pathetic, even from someone like me who hates women more than Imp ever could and has spent his life on the "Men's Rights" train.
Here we see one in action from the absolute big brains at Men's Rights, the controlled opposition of the "manosphere" world who have been circle jerking for over a decade to little result because they think "just copy everything Feminism did" is a strategy that can work.
That's the January 6 fallacy. "If they can burn down half the country, and get their way, surely we can engage in some misdemeanor parading".
At least Jan 6 can be considered a one off mistake, brought on by people hyped, rowdy and generally just pissed off.
These guys have spent over a decade there, and some of them even longer, "woke" to the problem. And spent that entire time thinking "we can just one day make people realize how bad it is, then they will obviously fix it because they feel bad for men!" Its the most beta bitch thought process that makes me feel far less sympathy for how many of them got divorce raped to hell (which is the most common reason to end up there).
And spent that entire time thinking "we can just one day make people realize how bad it is, then they will obviously fix it because they feel bad for men!"
People do stuff because it is in their interests, not because they 'feel bad'. So that is pretty stupid. That said, there is little reason to "feel bad for men".
I think there is plenty reason to feel bad, but none of that gives you free reign to sulk, lead others astray and be delusional. But that's a whole essay elsewhere.
But the entire movement of "women's rights" is built upon leveraging men's interest (aka desire to fuck and provide/support instinctually) to get what they wanted. It wasn't won through dominance in a war, it was whined until it was given to them. Something these types of MHRA/MRAs think can work in reverse.
The smarter ones realize they won't get sympathy and instead focus on laws and such. Which can make a dent, but fail to realize that the moment it truly becomes a problem for women it'll be stopped immediately. And that's without factoring in the absurd leeway judges/courts have to just blatantly ignore/interpret laws to their emotional desires (which usually always favor the woman anyway).
One thing women and feminists are great at its creating incredibly retarded scenarios to justify their beliefs, done by limiting one factor so significantly it forces the result you want (here its the time frame, wherein one week versus one year would change nothing for losing men, but have a massive difference losing women on many men/children).
Here we see one in action from the absolute big brains at Men's Rights, the controlled opposition of the "manosphere" world who have been circle jerking for over a decade to little result because they think "just copy everything Feminism did" is a strategy that can work. Such as writing dumb shit like this and then celebrating about how clever they are.
They were a joke 10 years ago and are still equally pathetic, even from someone like me who hates women more than Imp ever could and has spent his life on the "Men's Rights" train.
That's the January 6 fallacy. "If they can burn down half the country, and get their way, surely we can engage in some misdemeanor parading".
Nay, son.
At least Jan 6 can be considered a one off mistake, brought on by people hyped, rowdy and generally just pissed off.
These guys have spent over a decade there, and some of them even longer, "woke" to the problem. And spent that entire time thinking "we can just one day make people realize how bad it is, then they will obviously fix it because they feel bad for men!" Its the most beta bitch thought process that makes me feel far less sympathy for how many of them got divorce raped to hell (which is the most common reason to end up there).
People do stuff because it is in their interests, not because they 'feel bad'. So that is pretty stupid. That said, there is little reason to "feel bad for men".
I think there is plenty reason to feel bad, but none of that gives you free reign to sulk, lead others astray and be delusional. But that's a whole essay elsewhere.
But the entire movement of "women's rights" is built upon leveraging men's interest (aka desire to fuck and provide/support instinctually) to get what they wanted. It wasn't won through dominance in a war, it was whined until it was given to them. Something these types of MHRA/MRAs think can work in reverse.
The smarter ones realize they won't get sympathy and instead focus on laws and such. Which can make a dent, but fail to realize that the moment it truly becomes a problem for women it'll be stopped immediately. And that's without factoring in the absurd leeway judges/courts have to just blatantly ignore/interpret laws to their emotional desires (which usually always favor the woman anyway).