This its what its going to take to dislodge the narrative that ran the west since WW2.
Culturally relevant people who are brave and/or foolish enough to martyr themselves in the face social execution. And still smile and give the middle finger as the axe falls.
The sooner people come to terms that Hitler was a good man and not evil the better. I don't think the boomers ever will, but that's because they took all the media indoctrination hook line and sinker. If I had the choice to have my country ran by Hitler or Justin Trudeau there is no competition.
It's not a very easy way to break this down to people, and there is certainly better ways to do it. But given the circumstances this kind of issue needs to be brought up one way or another. It's a serious issue, from which many other issues like immigration, wokeness, and debt poverty are derived. It has to enter public consciousness one way or another.
He wasn't a good man. But he wasn't the incarnation of evil either--no human can be that. Treating him as a man who did monstrous things (and some good things) is better than treating him as a monster because it removes our capacity to see ourselves--fellow man--in him.
The sooner people come to terms that Hitler was a good man and not evil the better. I don't think the boomers ever will, but that's because they took all the media indoctrination hook line and sinker. If I had the choice to have my country ran by Hitler or Justin Trudeau there is no competition.
Look uh... at the risk of sounding like a consooomer I'm going to make a Halo analogy. That's like asking if you'd rather be overrun by the Covenant or the Flood. The Covenant is obviously far more preferable, but yeah.
Hitler was selected as the scapegoat for an entire era, but he still bears much of the responsibility for the deaths of millions of conscripts, the eventual fall of Eastern Europe to the USSR, and the pariah status of race realism in the West, setting aside the internal strife he wreaked on Germany of course. Hitler running your country would eventually result in your death, your brother's death, and your sister getting raped by some communist.
You're welcome. If he didn't want fire-bombing, he should have made mass execution of civilians a policy in both war and peace. I don't even have to bring up the holocaust. Just the shit he pulled with Greece is enough.
I also approve of firebombing the Soviet Union because Stalin is evil as well.
At some point, you've got to have the guy who won't stop slaughtering everyone and everything stopped.
Not sure what you're referring to. Firebombing raids aren't close to allied positions. Strafing civilians from aircraft wouldn't make sense. You need bombers.
That being said, Nazi polices aren't just bad, they're abhorrent. You have to make them completely fucking stop, because it's not like the Nazis aren't doing worse. They have no qualms being worse, right up front.
his policies justifed the firebombing of his country
For those not following along, this is the same asshole whose rebuttals to my criticism of Jewish power is "not all Jews." But I guess all Germans, right? Funny how NAXALT doesn't apply to liberalism's enemies. Whatever happened to all that individualism? You are genocidal, like I said. You have the audacity to call me a savage.
For the most part, I'm fucking with people who are saying "Hitler Dindu Nuffin"
Why should I give any sort of leeway to the criticisms of Nazi fans who would do not only the exact same, but far worse? If we play by the Hitler fan's rules, then mass genocide of every single liberal on earth is a moral imperative. I'm supposed to give moral tolerance and credence to someone who is dedicated to killing me, my family, my friends, and my country?
Nah. If you're supporting Nazi war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violent aggression; then I don't have to play nice.
If you support immolation and machine gunning of a church full of french civilians because you support collective abhorrent violence, then I don't have to stand here and treat you like an uninvolved third party. You appeal to my mercy when you are not in power because it is my principles; you deny me mercy when you are in power because it is in accordance with your principles.
Or, as Dave Smith once said, and I'm paraphrasing: "If we lived in Ancapistan in our bunker, and we saw an army of dudes, in uniform, with ladders and guns, obviously to break into our bunker... at some point you're going to have to treat that attacking army as a collective, because if you don't they will kill you." ... and you would.
Jokes, on you! I was only pretending to be genocidal!
This is just the old DrJester routine of "my opponents have even worse intentions than me therefore I can do whatever I want to them, including betraying all the principles I pretend to care about." It's vintage liberal bullshit.
mass genocide of every single liberal on earth is a moral imperative.
Nothing I say is consistent with this. Over and over and over again I tell you that liberalism is reproduced in a top down fashion. The mass of liberals are products of the system. It is you who is trying to direct me onto them throughout our recent conversations here. I wouldn't play along, and you just baselessly accuse me of being genocidal in a convo where you are justifying fire bombing civilians.
You do have worse intentions. I'm a fucking Liberal. Your purpose is to destroy men, and as I've said before: you won't be sparing anyone just because they're white.
you just baselessly accuse me of being genocidal in a convo where you are justifying fire bombing civilians.
I'm not apologizing for demanding the use of force to stop or slow Nazi atrocities. Patton was absolutely right not to take prisoners after the Malmedy Massacre, because it's the only way to make Leftists learn.
you won't be sparing anyone just because they're white.
You have no basis for this. You're just repeating the same bullshit. You replied but are ignoring the content of my comment.
The mass of liberals are products of the system. It is you who is trying to direct me onto them throughout our recent conversations here. I wouldn't play along, and you just baselessly accuse me of being genocidal in a convo where you are justifying fire bombing civilians.
What's really going on is that you can't wait to burn White children alive to save Jews, but you won't do jack shit except tell everyone to vote harder for the GOP to save White people.
You're a Leftist. You will always betray your own people in the service of your ideology. As I've told you before: as Feminists betray women, as Trade Uniononists betray laborers, as Communists betray the proletariat, as you will betray whites.
What's really going on is that you can't wait to burn White children alive to save Jews, but you won't do jack shit except tell everyone to vote harder for the GOP to save White people.
Nah, I want everyone to be armed in order to defend themselves. Including minors.
In addition to making Western Civilizatio what it is today, it is also the only thing that can protect westerners from the Socialism that is occupying their civilization
Hitler was a piece of shit and Kanye is being persucted by a bunch of wealthy Jewish elites in entertainment, banking etc. Both are true and not mutually exclusive
Kanye is basically martyring himself, and speaking with a kind of Christ-like "I love everyone regardless" attitude, while being used as a suicide bomb to destroy Trump, Tim Pool, and now Alex Jones.
What he's done wrong is get used as a Truck Of Peace by Milo and Fuentez
Eric Zemmour and Steve Bannon weren't going around and blowing up their own credibility to serve the interests of 2 retards, at the expense of their entire populist movement.
In fact, screeching about jews would be the worst thing that either of them could have done.
That's a meme. "Democracy" is a meme. It's ok to deconvert,
You're actually going past the point you're making and attempting to claim that the idea of any popular movement can exist. Why are you hear wasting time spouting opinions then, if we're just going to attribute ourselves to only Elite Theory.
No doubt, if he kept calling himself & other blacks "niggers" in songs, and black women bitches, he'd still have his "credibility" and you wouldn't be saying any of this.
Black vocalists using slurs doesn't hurt their credibility.
It's actually kind of crazy how Ye lines up with stuff you've been saying here.
This is an excellent take on this bit of political theater.
This its what its going to take to dislodge the narrative that ran the west since WW2.
Culturally relevant people who are brave and/or foolish enough to martyr themselves in the face social execution. And still smile and give the middle finger as the axe falls.
The sooner people come to terms that Hitler was a good man and not evil the better. I don't think the boomers ever will, but that's because they took all the media indoctrination hook line and sinker. If I had the choice to have my country ran by Hitler or Justin Trudeau there is no competition.
It's not a very easy way to break this down to people, and there is certainly better ways to do it. But given the circumstances this kind of issue needs to be brought up one way or another. It's a serious issue, from which many other issues like immigration, wokeness, and debt poverty are derived. It has to enter public consciousness one way or another.
He wasn't a good man. But he wasn't the incarnation of evil either--no human can be that. Treating him as a man who did monstrous things (and some good things) is better than treating him as a monster because it removes our capacity to see ourselves--fellow man--in him.
Look uh... at the risk of sounding like a consooomer I'm going to make a Halo analogy. That's like asking if you'd rather be overrun by the Covenant or the Flood. The Covenant is obviously far more preferable, but yeah.
Hitler was selected as the scapegoat for an entire era, but he still bears much of the responsibility for the deaths of millions of conscripts, the eventual fall of Eastern Europe to the USSR, and the pariah status of race realism in the West, setting aside the internal strife he wreaked on Germany of course. Hitler running your country would eventually result in your death, your brother's death, and your sister getting raped by some communist.
Hitler was an evil man, and his policies justifed the firebombing of his country.
Stop trying to simp for Socialists because you think you can be at the guard in the camp and not against the wall.
Proving your actually too stupid to be allowed around corners. Once again: "I totally wouldn't be the target of bad policy"
Now I know you are evil.
You're welcome. If he didn't want fire-bombing, he should have made mass execution of civilians a policy in both war and peace. I don't even have to bring up the holocaust. Just the shit he pulled with Greece is enough.
I also approve of firebombing the Soviet Union because Stalin is evil as well.
At some point, you've got to have the guy who won't stop slaughtering everyone and everything stopped.
By firebombing civilian populations and gunning down any survivors the next morning.
Not sure what you're referring to. Firebombing raids aren't close to allied positions. Strafing civilians from aircraft wouldn't make sense. You need bombers.
That being said, Nazi polices aren't just bad, they're abhorrent. You have to make them completely fucking stop, because it's not like the Nazis aren't doing worse. They have no qualms being worse, right up front.
For those not following along, this is the same asshole whose rebuttals to my criticism of Jewish power is "not all Jews." But I guess all Germans, right? Funny how NAXALT doesn't apply to liberalism's enemies. Whatever happened to all that individualism? You are genocidal, like I said. You have the audacity to call me a savage.
For the most part, I'm fucking with people who are saying "Hitler Dindu Nuffin"
Why should I give any sort of leeway to the criticisms of Nazi fans who would do not only the exact same, but far worse? If we play by the Hitler fan's rules, then mass genocide of every single liberal on earth is a moral imperative. I'm supposed to give moral tolerance and credence to someone who is dedicated to killing me, my family, my friends, and my country?
Nah. If you're supporting Nazi war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violent aggression; then I don't have to play nice.
If you support immolation and machine gunning of a church full of french civilians because you support collective abhorrent violence, then I don't have to stand here and treat you like an uninvolved third party. You appeal to my mercy when you are not in power because it is my principles; you deny me mercy when you are in power because it is in accordance with your principles.
Or, as Dave Smith once said, and I'm paraphrasing: "If we lived in Ancapistan in our bunker, and we saw an army of dudes, in uniform, with ladders and guns, obviously to break into our bunker... at some point you're going to have to treat that attacking army as a collective, because if you don't they will kill you." ... and you would.
Jokes, on you! I was only pretending to be genocidal!
This is just the old DrJester routine of "my opponents have even worse intentions than me therefore I can do whatever I want to them, including betraying all the principles I pretend to care about." It's vintage liberal bullshit.
Nothing I say is consistent with this. Over and over and over again I tell you that liberalism is reproduced in a top down fashion. The mass of liberals are products of the system. It is you who is trying to direct me onto them throughout our recent conversations here. I wouldn't play along, and you just baselessly accuse me of being genocidal in a convo where you are justifying fire bombing civilians.
Priceless
He's been on my radar as a bad actor for years now. Him coming out as openly ok with firebombing civilians is confirmation of all my suspicions.
You do have worse intentions. I'm a fucking Liberal. Your purpose is to destroy men, and as I've said before: you won't be sparing anyone just because they're white.
I'm not apologizing for demanding the use of force to stop or slow Nazi atrocities. Patton was absolutely right not to take prisoners after the Malmedy Massacre, because it's the only way to make Leftists learn.
You have no basis for this. You're just repeating the same bullshit. You replied but are ignoring the content of my comment.
What's really going on is that you can't wait to burn White children alive to save Jews, but you won't do jack shit except tell everyone to vote harder for the GOP to save White people.
You're a Leftist. You will always betray your own people in the service of your ideology. As I've told you before: as Feminists betray women, as Trade Uniononists betray laborers, as Communists betray the proletariat, as you will betray whites.
Nah, I want everyone to be armed in order to defend themselves. Including minors.
Liberal Capitalism is the basis to the growth and prosperity of Western Civilization. You're completely backwards on that.
In addition to making Western Civilizatio what it is today, it is also the only thing that can protect westerners from the Socialism that is occupying their civilization
Spengler is a retard then.
And yes, the problems we are facing are from Fabian Socialism, not free markets.
We are all ordinary men.
Hitler was a piece of shit and Kanye is being persucted by a bunch of wealthy Jewish elites in entertainment, banking etc. Both are true and not mutually exclusive
Kanye is basically martyring himself, and speaking with a kind of Christ-like "I love everyone regardless" attitude, while being used as a suicide bomb to destroy Trump, Tim Pool, and now Alex Jones.
What he's done wrong is get used as a Truck Of Peace by Milo and Fuentez
Eric Zemmour and Steve Bannon weren't going around and blowing up their own credibility to serve the interests of 2 retards, at the expense of their entire populist movement.
In fact, screeching about jews would be the worst thing that either of them could have done.
You're actually going past the point you're making and attempting to claim that the idea of any popular movement can exist. Why are you hear wasting time spouting opinions then, if we're just going to attribute ourselves to only Elite Theory.
Black vocalists using slurs doesn't hurt their credibility.
I'm not seeing your point here. A rap star and the prime minister of France are never going to have the same standards or credibility.