Which is Scarier?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
“Revolutionizing beauty” apparently means destroying all meaning of the word.
Revolution(nizing). Overthrowing the old, instituting the new "beauty". Twist and change words is what they do. Keeps division alive, keeps people debating meanings instead of acting, keeps people afraid of saying the wrong meaning, and allows for being the authority on what it means going forward. Able to change it again, on a whim.
The second one is essentially harmless, too. An ant body that large simply wouldn't have enough strength to support itself. Insect bodies and chitin carapaces don't really work outside of the realm of the minuscule.
A lot of the bodies on the left are too large to support themselves too.
Maybe they exist in a 75% oxygen test environment?
A super-heavily-oxygen-loaded air environment can facilitate the growth of fairly large insects, far beyond what our square-cube law allows for with our paltry percentage.
I'm not just talking about growth. I'm talking about how they just don't have the muscle mass. Their types of bodies only work with small sizes.
The giant ants were honest about what they wanted.
Then is a great classic movie. The other one is a ridiculous example of how insane we have become
scarier ? The ants.
Disgusting/revolting ? The things on the left
They’re the same picture.
The ants would flee from the hideousness on the left.
I'd rather have that close-up of the ant's face that's going around hanging on my wall than those bloated monkeypig wannabees.
7 Men and 2 dykes.
I'm pretty sure I could either out walk or punch out any of the creatures on the left. Not quite so confident about the giant insects on the right.
One is a terrifying hivemind of insectoid child-eating monsters which are spreading like bacteria and will certainly doom us all unless we stop them at their source.
The other is just some giant ants, I don't know much about em.