I read them as a kid and even then realized that the men were all heavily emasculated and stupid or evil. The women were always the smartest person in the room and Dumbledore was retconned to be gay, because the one competent old man had to be gay. Rowling can’t write a masculine male to save her life and it shows through the books, I quit after 4 because it was tediously bad and obvious she was going to continually kill off any positive male influences. Know what actual 12 year old boys do? Fight, compete, and create social stacks out of those competitions.
Well yes when I was 12 i did all that as well as discovering how great women looked. At least Harry was a hero. I didn’t get tired of the strong female who is better than all the guys trope til later
See I was reading Greek mythology, lotr/ hobbit, and books like Enders game, redwall etc at the same time as Harry Potter and the stark contrast in the positive male influences and boys actually acting like boys was a stark contrast
I can see that. Growing up I read a lot of sci fi and paranormal books but sci fi back then had good male characters. I didn’t read Tolkien til I was in my 30s (watched the cartoons growing up) and we read Greek mythology in school. But I get your point. Unfortunately I didn’t understand the value of positive male influences til a bit later because growing up in the 80s tv was full of them and I had my father, grandfather, uncles, brothers, etc. you don’t realize the need til it’s gone
There was a time when we were boosting Kerzner because of her criticism of Anita Sarkeesian. Even in retrospect I think that was a good decision, but damn, people do fall off...
Liana was always awful. She was good cop to Anita's bad cop. She still believed all the feminist theology, she just pretended she didn't hate you and used her tits to distract people from the fact that she was an idiot.
Ah yes, the dirty money behind Coercive Control, who counts someone who calls the SCUM Manifesto, which is a book about the mass extermination of men, "excellent holiday reading" as her friend and political ally.
JK Rowling (provided funding for) -> Julie Bindel (who pushed coercive control with government support, while being a major supporter of...) -> Valerie Solanas, male genocide advocate.
Except I didn't defend the murderer, I said it's all a hoax.
Also that she 'deserved to die', which you defended in ways that convinced no one that you were not being a bad actor.
They aren't tenuous, there's literally a quote from JK Rowling on Bindel's book about her feminist action, for fuck sake.
One can approve of Bindel's book on feminism, without approving of that woman you're so obsessed with. Yes, even if Bindel wrote an article defending her man-hating while saying she went too far.
I'm getting so frustrated, I'm starting to write like an English person again.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
You're being way too lenient with her. It's ridiculous. She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized. Anyone who supports her should be [reference to famous Coercive Control murderer that breaks Rule 2 removed] in Minecraft.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
lol, what? Are you completely mad?
You know that even if you have a point about it being 'weaponized', you lose all credibility in the eyes of anyone who is not insane by branding it a hoax? Which means they will not listen to anything else you have to say. So much for you persuading 80% of people to hate women if you appeared for 5 minutes on TV.
You're being way too lenient with her
There are bigger fish to fry than to be concerned over your dick.
She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized.
You never answered me, that if "killing men" is "decriminalized", how come there are so few killings of men by women.
I wonder if JK realizes her books were/are the bastions of gay groomers
Really? I read them as an adult but I liked them. Granted I don’t look at kids/teens that way
I read them as a kid and even then realized that the men were all heavily emasculated and stupid or evil. The women were always the smartest person in the room and Dumbledore was retconned to be gay, because the one competent old man had to be gay. Rowling can’t write a masculine male to save her life and it shows through the books, I quit after 4 because it was tediously bad and obvious she was going to continually kill off any positive male influences. Know what actual 12 year old boys do? Fight, compete, and create social stacks out of those competitions.
Well yes when I was 12 i did all that as well as discovering how great women looked. At least Harry was a hero. I didn’t get tired of the strong female who is better than all the guys trope til later
See I was reading Greek mythology, lotr/ hobbit, and books like Enders game, redwall etc at the same time as Harry Potter and the stark contrast in the positive male influences and boys actually acting like boys was a stark contrast
I can see that. Growing up I read a lot of sci fi and paranormal books but sci fi back then had good male characters. I didn’t read Tolkien til I was in my 30s (watched the cartoons growing up) and we read Greek mythology in school. But I get your point. Unfortunately I didn’t understand the value of positive male influences til a bit later because growing up in the 80s tv was full of them and I had my father, grandfather, uncles, brothers, etc. you don’t realize the need til it’s gone
As a kid I always wondered why none of the fuckers were into physical fitness
Are people finally realizing Kerzner is a piece of shit
From another GG War veteran in the issue: https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/mermaids-and-the-worldwide-push-to
Yesterday's ally is today's enemy, and vice versa.
I have infinitely more respect for Linehan than I do for Eyepatch McCain types. At least the man has courage.
There was a time when we were boosting Kerzner because of her criticism of Anita Sarkeesian. Even in retrospect I think that was a good decision, but damn, people do fall off...
Liana was always awful. She was good cop to Anita's bad cop. She still believed all the feminist theology, she just pretended she didn't hate you and used her tits to distract people from the fact that she was an idiot.
From the other side of the old abandoned trenches: https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/mermaids-and-the-worldwide-push-to
That was never a good decision and I railed against it then and I do now
Ah yes, the dirty money behind Coercive Control, who counts someone who calls the SCUM Manifesto, which is a book about the mass extermination of men, "excellent holiday reading" as her friend and political ally.
Fuck you, I hope the trannies get you.
Six Degrees of Womaning
Six? It's two.
JK Rowling (provided funding for) -> Julie Bindel (who pushed coercive control with government support, while being a major supporter of...) -> Valerie Solanas, male genocide advocate.
These are all very tenuous connections.
It's like saying:
Antonio (provides a platform for) > Imp (defends) > the murderer of Sarah Everhard
Except I didn't defend the murderer, I said it's all a hoax.
They aren't tenuous, there's literally a quote from JK Rowling on Bindel's book about her feminist action, for fuck sake.
I'm getting so frustrated, I'm starting to write like an English person again.
https://archive.ph/VoFYn
Also that she 'deserved to die', which you defended in ways that convinced no one that you were not being a bad actor.
One can approve of Bindel's book on feminism, without approving of that woman you're so obsessed with. Yes, even if Bindel wrote an article defending her man-hating while saying she went too far.
As if that's a bad thing.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
You're being way too lenient with her. It's ridiculous. She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized. Anyone who supports her should be [reference to famous Coercive Control murderer that breaks Rule 2 removed] in Minecraft.
lol, what? Are you completely mad?
You know that even if you have a point about it being 'weaponized', you lose all credibility in the eyes of anyone who is not insane by branding it a hoax? Which means they will not listen to anything else you have to say. So much for you persuading 80% of people to hate women if you appeared for 5 minutes on TV.
There are bigger fish to fry than to be concerned over your dick.
You never answered me, that if "killing men" is "decriminalized", how come there are so few killings of men by women.