That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
You're being way too lenient with her. It's ridiculous. She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized. Anyone who supports her should be [reference to famous Coercive Control murderer that breaks Rule 2 removed] in Minecraft.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
lol, what? Are you completely mad?
You know that even if you have a point about it being 'weaponized', you lose all credibility in the eyes of anyone who is not insane by branding it a hoax? Which means they will not listen to anything else you have to say. So much for you persuading 80% of people to hate women if you appeared for 5 minutes on TV.
You're being way too lenient with her
There are bigger fish to fry than to be concerned over your dick.
She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized.
You never answered me, that if "killing men" is "decriminalized", how come there are so few killings of men by women.
thispersondoesnotexist.com - It's not hard to fake a picture of someone who was allegedly murdered. Why did the Everard hoax coincide with the date that the "misogyny" law review was due to close with the recommendation that it was not to be continued?
So if a Neo-Nazi snuck into a position of power and decriminalized killing Jews, you'd have the same nonchalant reaction?
Because men can still defend themselves physically.
It's not hard to fake a picture of someone who was allegedly murdered. Why did the Everard hoax coincide with the date that the "misogyny" law review was due to close with the recommendation that it was not to be continued?
Rock-solid evidence there.
So if a Neo-Nazi snuck into a position of power and decriminalized killing Jews, you'd have the same nonchalant reaction?
I think what you're complaining about is bad, but that you exaggerate... as usual.
Because men can still defend themselves physically.
Wait, but when I tell you that, you tell me that it's irrelevant because "weapons exist" and if men defend themselves, they will be jailed. So how does that work? Why are the womens not using weapons to start The Genocide they so yearn for, even though killing men has been decriminalized? Furthermore, why are they not attacking men, forcing them to defend themselves, and then have them arrested and jailed to ruin the lives of men which is their fondest hope and dream?
Well, it really isn't difficult. Fake picture, plaster it all over the news, set someone up to take the fall (The "murderer" had ties to parliamentary security) and profit. It's not like you need anyone to keep the hoax going once the empty casket is buried.
I'm not exaggerating. If anything I'm understating, given that Nazi Germany killed six million Jews and radical feminists desire to kill over three billion men and boys.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
You're being way too lenient with her. It's ridiculous. She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized. Anyone who supports her should be [reference to famous Coercive Control murderer that breaks Rule 2 removed] in Minecraft.
lol, what? Are you completely mad?
You know that even if you have a point about it being 'weaponized', you lose all credibility in the eyes of anyone who is not insane by branding it a hoax? Which means they will not listen to anything else you have to say. So much for you persuading 80% of people to hate women if you appeared for 5 minutes on TV.
There are bigger fish to fry than to be concerned over your dick.
You never answered me, that if "killing men" is "decriminalized", how come there are so few killings of men by women.
thispersondoesnotexist.com - It's not hard to fake a picture of someone who was allegedly murdered. Why did the Everard hoax coincide with the date that the "misogyny" law review was due to close with the recommendation that it was not to be continued?
So if a Neo-Nazi snuck into a position of power and decriminalized killing Jews, you'd have the same nonchalant reaction?
Because men can still defend themselves physically.
Rock-solid evidence there.
I think what you're complaining about is bad, but that you exaggerate... as usual.
Wait, but when I tell you that, you tell me that it's irrelevant because "weapons exist" and if men defend themselves, they will be jailed. So how does that work? Why are the womens not using weapons to start The Genocide they so yearn for, even though killing men has been decriminalized? Furthermore, why are they not attacking men, forcing them to defend themselves, and then have them arrested and jailed to ruin the lives of men which is their fondest hope and dream?
It all makes a ton of sense.
Well, it really isn't difficult. Fake picture, plaster it all over the news, set someone up to take the fall (The "murderer" had ties to parliamentary security) and profit. It's not like you need anyone to keep the hoax going once the empty casket is buried.
I'm not exaggerating. If anything I'm understating, given that Nazi Germany killed six million Jews and radical feminists desire to kill over three billion men and boys.
Better to be tried by twelve than carried by six.