Except I didn't defend the murderer, I said it's all a hoax.
Also that she 'deserved to die', which you defended in ways that convinced no one that you were not being a bad actor.
They aren't tenuous, there's literally a quote from JK Rowling on Bindel's book about her feminist action, for fuck sake.
One can approve of Bindel's book on feminism, without approving of that woman you're so obsessed with. Yes, even if Bindel wrote an article defending her man-hating while saying she went too far.
I'm getting so frustrated, I'm starting to write like an English person again.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
You're being way too lenient with her. It's ridiculous. She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized. Anyone who supports her should be [reference to famous Coercive Control murderer that breaks Rule 2 removed] in Minecraft.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
lol, what? Are you completely mad?
You know that even if you have a point about it being 'weaponized', you lose all credibility in the eyes of anyone who is not insane by branding it a hoax? Which means they will not listen to anything else you have to say. So much for you persuading 80% of people to hate women if you appeared for 5 minutes on TV.
You're being way too lenient with her
There are bigger fish to fry than to be concerned over your dick.
She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized.
You never answered me, that if "killing men" is "decriminalized", how come there are so few killings of men by women.
These are all very tenuous connections.
It's like saying:
Antonio (provides a platform for) > Imp (defends) > the murderer of Sarah Everhard
Except I didn't defend the murderer, I said it's all a hoax.
They aren't tenuous, there's literally a quote from JK Rowling on Bindel's book about her feminist action, for fuck sake.
I'm getting so frustrated, I'm starting to write like an English person again.
https://archive.ph/VoFYn
Also that she 'deserved to die', which you defended in ways that convinced no one that you were not being a bad actor.
One can approve of Bindel's book on feminism, without approving of that woman you're so obsessed with. Yes, even if Bindel wrote an article defending her man-hating while saying she went too far.
As if that's a bad thing.
That fucking hoax decimated the progress against women's lies and weaponization of the justice system. The Everard hoax has probably already cost over a hundred lives because of how much it empowered women's hatred.
You're being way too lenient with her. It's ridiculous. She literally told people she reads the SCUM Manifesto for pleasure, and then is heavily involved in a law that makes killing men decriminalized. Anyone who supports her should be [reference to famous Coercive Control murderer that breaks Rule 2 removed] in Minecraft.
lol, what? Are you completely mad?
You know that even if you have a point about it being 'weaponized', you lose all credibility in the eyes of anyone who is not insane by branding it a hoax? Which means they will not listen to anything else you have to say. So much for you persuading 80% of people to hate women if you appeared for 5 minutes on TV.
There are bigger fish to fry than to be concerned over your dick.
You never answered me, that if "killing men" is "decriminalized", how come there are so few killings of men by women.