The US isn't helping Ukraine because it is scared of Russia, it is helping Ukraine because Putin's war of aggression is morally wrong, as well as an unacceptable attempt to engage in empire-building, which is inconsistent with the desires of the guarantors of free trade.
Nobody credulous really believes the "training exercise" excuse, as it is obvious bullshit. You only "believe" it because you're a partisan.
Yes, Philip Short being 77 is a small strike against him, however that was not a significant part of my refutation of him, so I don't know why you singled. Oh wait, I DO know: you lack confidence on any of my substantive points.
I disagree, I think Biden cares about US soldiers far moreso than Putin cares about Russian soldiers, which is admittedly a low bar. People who shill for obviously evil people love the cope that they pretend that everyone in the world is equally evil, the "good guys" just hide it better. That's a childish world view.
Americans absolutely would not blow up the WTC, because they have morals and ethics and do not want to murder their fellow Americans. They aren't heartless killers like Putin, who routinely engages in murder of anyone who he simply dislikes, even if they are not a threat to the regime.
I knew you'd whine about my citing the NYT. NYT book reviews are one of the most famous and well known.
I don't worship Republicans. You worship Putin, a loser and failure who tricked you into thinking he gives a fuck about your political goals so that he could get you to be an internet janny shill for him. You're a useful idiot for his desire to rebuild the USSR, and she doesn't give the slightest shit about you or what you want culturally or politically. Republicans, on the other hand, are actually fighting the culture war and in the trenches and starting to get some victories. So yeah, my support of Republicans is moving the ball in the direction you claim to cherish. Your support of Putin is not. Hence why I suspect the possibility that you're some kind of agent. You claimed goals and what you write don't actually line up. Your devotion to and shilling for Putin cannot be explained away by the mere fact that Putin doesn't like gay pride parades. Like why the fuck do you need to shill for him on Ryazan? You wouldn't give the slightest shit if you only saw Putin as a useful tool against the wokes.
"The moment anyone tells you what you want to hear or believe for ideological purposes, you take it as gospel truth. The evidence doesn't matter." Outstanding job describing yourself, not me. "accuse your opponent of that of which you are guilty" is probably in your employee handbook.
"Those stockpiles are a joke and won't get Germany through the winter" Sure they can, because of course Germany still has months to obtain more energy before and during the winter from other sources. Russia didn't have a monopoly on gas. The stockpiles are there as a cushion. Nobody believes that all energy supplies are going to get cut off and Germany is going to have to solely ration out the stockpile.
"Pangs of conscience over what you did with their pipeline if they end up starving and freezing?" Accusing me of what your Daddy Putin did, "accuse your opponent of that of which you are guilty" twice in one comment. If you remain this predictable you might get replaced by an AI.
The US isn't helping Ukraine because it is scared of Russia, it is helping Ukraine because Putin's war of aggression is morally wrong
BAHAHAHA. No way you believe this. Your shithole of a country has done nothing but engage in aggression for the past few decades. You bombed Serbia and Libya to smithereens, and now you claim that your country opposes wars of aggression. What a joke. World-class hypocrites you are.
Nobody credulous really believes the "training exercise" excuse, as it is obvious bullshit. You only "believe" it because you're a partisan.
Yes, the credulous people believe in false flags. (This is why my English better than yours. I actually know what the word means.)
I think Biden cares about US soldiers far moreso than Putin cares about Russian soldiers, which is admittedly a low bar. People who shill for obviously evil people love the cope that they pretend that everyone in the world is equally evil, the "good guys" just hide it better. That's a childish world view.
It's childish to pretend that your politicians are better than the other guy's politicians, because MURICA AMIRITE?
Americans absolutely would not blow up the WTC, because they have morals and ethics and do not want to murder their fellow Americans. They aren't heartless killers like Putin, who routinely engages in murder of anyone who he simply dislikes, even if they are not a threat to the regime.
You would only murder... check notes... Russians, Serbian, Yemenis, Nicaraguans, Grenadites, Iraqis, Afghans, and basically every other nationality throughout the world. Oh, and also Anwar Al-Awlawki, an American citizen, and his 16-year-old son and then his 8-year-old daughter.
By the way, I totally believe that ordinary Americans wouldn't do it. We're talking about your government though, which proposed Operation Northwood, and killed that 14-year-old Sammy Weaver kid, not to mention Ashlii Babbitt.
I knew you'd whine about my citing the NYT. NYT book reviews are one of the most famous and well known.
Wow, famous and 'well-known'. Like Jussie Smollett. Do Americans judge everything by how famous it is?
I don't worship Republicans. You worship Putin
What's the proof that I "worship" Putin? You certainly defend Republicans more than I defend Putin.
You worship Putin, a loser and failure who tricked you into thinking he gives a fuck about your political goals
Putin doesn't lose, Putin doesn't fail. You'll do well to remember that, before you force him to turn all of America into Chicago. And you know full well that I don't think that Putin cares about my political goals. Yet he opposes the regime.
so that he could get you to be an internet janny shill for him.
I don't get it. First you accuse me of being biased against you, then you say that I wasn't biased against you, and now you say that I was a 'shill' for Putin as a moderator. Have you forgotten who instantaneously approved all your requested for approved submitter status, regardless of your opinions? Of course, it was just 90D chess to throw you off your brilliant scent, because I could tell that you were about to blow my FSB cover! But then again, I'm very "stupid" according to you, so how could I play such 90D chess?
Republicans, on the other hand, are actually fighting the culture war and in the trenches and starting to get some victories.
Right, you have to wait until kids are 8 before you groom them. Great victory. 10/10.
Like why the fuck do you need to shill for him on Ryazan?
Someone disagrees with dekachin on the highly improbable and dangerous plot to... blow up Russian citizens in order to justify a highly improbable and unlikely to succeed campaign against Chechnya, so he must be a Russian agent! Brilliantly done.
The moment anyone tells you what you want to hear or believe for ideological purposes, you take it as gospel truth. The evidence doesn't matter." Outstanding job describing yourself, not me. "accuse your opponent of that of which you are guilty" is probably in your employee handbook.
Well, you did it, because you quoted the New York Times as well as Wikipedia. If you think those sources are reliable, you should check what they write about your beloved Republicans.
Sure they can, because of course Germany still has months to obtain more energy before and during the winter from other sources. Russia didn't have a monopoly on gas. The stockpiles are there as a cushion. Nobody believes that all energy supplies are going to get cut off and Germany is going to have to solely ration out the stockpile.
It's not nearly enough. Not sure why you persist in such insanity.
Accusing me of what your Daddy Putin did, "accuse your opponent of that of which you are guilty" twice in one comment. If you remain this predictable you might get replaced by an AI.
I mean, you blew up their pipeline, you forced them to enact sanctions, so yeah. It was you. Your denials are about as credible as you calling me an FSB agent.
So I opposed both of those so idk why youre coming at me with those. In both cases the US was only going along with Euros and willingly acting as their enforcer and muscle so Democrats could ingratiate themselves to the filthy, degenerate, globohomo euros. Clinton bombed Serbia. Obama bombed Libya. I doubt that Trump would have been willing to join the Euros in either endeavor.
But those weren't "wars of aggression" anyway. Serbia was bombed to stop its invasion of Kosovo and to stop a fake genocide that was believed to have been happening. Libya was just a civil war where the Euros + US gave air support to the rebels.
Yes, the credulous people believe in false flags. (This is why my English better than yours. I actually know what the word means.)
My statement obviously meant "even gullible people would not believe that excuse because it is so obviously bullshit", and you stupidly misread it and assumed I am an idiot who meant to use fastidious or something. Your ego is suffering right now, and you're desperate to cling to anything that will help you feel smarter. It's sad.
You're getting tilted because (1) I've been landing too many hits on your lately, and (2) your Daddy Putin's war is going very poorly and there is a general malaise and frustration among Russian warmongers these days. Losing Izyum was bad, but the shills thought "ok we were caught sleeping, but we will shorten the lines and recover" BUT THEN UKRAINE KEPT ON GOING and now has successfully taken Lyman, with the Russians just getting bitch slapped around now for a month straight with no end in sight.
This must weigh heavily on you and your coworkers.
Putin doesn't lose, Putin doesn't fail. You'll do well to remember that, before you force him to turn all of America into Chicago.
lolololol I honestly hope you're getting a paycheck for this, bro.
So I opposed both of those so idk why youre coming at me with those.
Ehm, you said "the United States opposes wars of aggression".
Clearly not.
Serbia was bombed to stop its invasion of Kosovo
Its own country. In which case, Russia bombed Ukraine to stop its invasion of the Donbas.
Libya was just a civil war where the Euros + US gave air support to the rebels.
Now what implications would this have for the Ukraine thing? You don't think things through, do you? I really do hope you serve your clients better than you do your Eyepatch McCain-tier opinions.
My statement obviously meant "even gullible people would not believe that excuse because it is so obviously bullshit",
Your statement obviously means "no one who is gullible believes this". Again, you try to blame others for your own slip-ups.
Your ego is suffering right now, and you're desperate to cling to anything that will help you feel smarter.
Well, this is about as accurate an analysis as I expect from a guy who believes that cricket noises create brain damage...
You're getting tilted because (1) I've been landing too many hits on your lately
Dude, I'm not even cross with you, despite all your attempts even way back when on Reddit. You sometimes even manage to make good arguments. At other times, you're just batshit crazy. It's all fine, as you seem well-intentioned to me even when you're wrong (which is often).
This must weigh heavily on you and your coworkers.
LOL! See, I can't even tell if you're joking or legit crazy.
lolololol I honestly hope you're getting a paycheck for this, bro.
Pretty crazy to think that you could get a paycheck for posting on the internet. But maybe you have personal experience with something I don't. Any Langley statements on your bank account?
You also failed to address the rest of the comment. Must be the first time that you had nothing to say, because you usually make up some BS to say in reply. Did I land one too many hits on you?
Russia bombed Ukraine to stop its invasion of the Donbas.
Ukraine wasn't invading the Donbass. This is unlike what Russia did in Georgia where they baited the Georgians to attack South Ossetia [who actually started it by shelling the Georgians] as a pretext to attack immediately after staging all their troops right over the border on a pretext of "exercises". By contrast, Ukraine was just minding its own business when Putin launched his naked war of aggression against it in February.
Your statement obviously means "no one who is gullible believes this". Again, you try to blame others for your own slip-ups.
I've told you that is exactly what I intended to say, and yet you refuse to accept it. As I know my mind, and you do not, my statement on the matter is definitive and undisputed. You are not qualified to contradict it. Your little pet theory that I meant to use a different word and meant to convey a different meaning is, quite frankly, a pathetic cope and makes you look like a loser who is tilting.
from a guy who believes that cricket noises create brain damage...
Cricket noises do not cause brain damage, but pulsed microwave radiation does.
At other times, you're just batshit crazy.
Imp is batshit about women. You are batshit about the US and Putin in general.
Pretty crazy to think that you could get a paycheck for posting on the internet.
It's a very common and open thing with Chinese. Hell, I just got lit up by wumao accounts on reddit yesterday when someone posted that China has the lowest suicide rate in the world and I replied "China also has the lowest COVID rate in the world according to China. LOL." Had wumaos reply saying it's true. LOL. They're either ethnic Han who have been brainwashed into doing it for free out of misguided ethnic tribalism, in which case they're traitors who ought to be deported, OR they're paid members of the 50 cent army.
Russia does the same thing, just on a smaller scale, and they're sneakier about it.
You also failed to address the rest of the comment.
I purposely do not respond when something you wrote is just trivial or bitchy. It clutters up the reply and adds nothing of value. If you write substantive things that I haven't already responded to such that I'd be repeating myself, then I respond.
The US isn't helping Ukraine because it is scared of Russia, it is helping Ukraine because Putin's war of aggression is morally wrong, as well as an unacceptable attempt to engage in empire-building, which is inconsistent with the desires of the guarantors of free trade.
Nobody credulous really believes the "training exercise" excuse, as it is obvious bullshit. You only "believe" it because you're a partisan.
Yes, Philip Short being 77 is a small strike against him, however that was not a significant part of my refutation of him, so I don't know why you singled. Oh wait, I DO know: you lack confidence on any of my substantive points.
I disagree, I think Biden cares about US soldiers far moreso than Putin cares about Russian soldiers, which is admittedly a low bar. People who shill for obviously evil people love the cope that they pretend that everyone in the world is equally evil, the "good guys" just hide it better. That's a childish world view.
Americans absolutely would not blow up the WTC, because they have morals and ethics and do not want to murder their fellow Americans. They aren't heartless killers like Putin, who routinely engages in murder of anyone who he simply dislikes, even if they are not a threat to the regime.
I knew you'd whine about my citing the NYT. NYT book reviews are one of the most famous and well known.
I don't worship Republicans. You worship Putin, a loser and failure who tricked you into thinking he gives a fuck about your political goals so that he could get you to be an internet janny shill for him. You're a useful idiot for his desire to rebuild the USSR, and she doesn't give the slightest shit about you or what you want culturally or politically. Republicans, on the other hand, are actually fighting the culture war and in the trenches and starting to get some victories. So yeah, my support of Republicans is moving the ball in the direction you claim to cherish. Your support of Putin is not. Hence why I suspect the possibility that you're some kind of agent. You claimed goals and what you write don't actually line up. Your devotion to and shilling for Putin cannot be explained away by the mere fact that Putin doesn't like gay pride parades. Like why the fuck do you need to shill for him on Ryazan? You wouldn't give the slightest shit if you only saw Putin as a useful tool against the wokes.
"The moment anyone tells you what you want to hear or believe for ideological purposes, you take it as gospel truth. The evidence doesn't matter." Outstanding job describing yourself, not me. "accuse your opponent of that of which you are guilty" is probably in your employee handbook.
"Those stockpiles are a joke and won't get Germany through the winter" Sure they can, because of course Germany still has months to obtain more energy before and during the winter from other sources. Russia didn't have a monopoly on gas. The stockpiles are there as a cushion. Nobody believes that all energy supplies are going to get cut off and Germany is going to have to solely ration out the stockpile.
"Pangs of conscience over what you did with their pipeline if they end up starving and freezing?" Accusing me of what your Daddy Putin did, "accuse your opponent of that of which you are guilty" twice in one comment. If you remain this predictable you might get replaced by an AI.
BAHAHAHA. No way you believe this. Your shithole of a country has done nothing but engage in aggression for the past few decades. You bombed Serbia and Libya to smithereens, and now you claim that your country opposes wars of aggression. What a joke. World-class hypocrites you are.
Yes, the credulous people believe in false flags. (This is why my English better than yours. I actually know what the word means.)
It's childish to pretend that your politicians are better than the other guy's politicians, because MURICA AMIRITE?
You would only murder... check notes... Russians, Serbian, Yemenis, Nicaraguans, Grenadites, Iraqis, Afghans, and basically every other nationality throughout the world. Oh, and also Anwar Al-Awlawki, an American citizen, and his 16-year-old son and then his 8-year-old daughter.
By the way, I totally believe that ordinary Americans wouldn't do it. We're talking about your government though, which proposed Operation Northwood, and killed that 14-year-old Sammy Weaver kid, not to mention Ashlii Babbitt.
Wow, famous and 'well-known'. Like Jussie Smollett. Do Americans judge everything by how famous it is?
What's the proof that I "worship" Putin? You certainly defend Republicans more than I defend Putin.
Putin doesn't lose, Putin doesn't fail. You'll do well to remember that, before you force him to turn all of America into Chicago. And you know full well that I don't think that Putin cares about my political goals. Yet he opposes the regime.
I don't get it. First you accuse me of being biased against you, then you say that I wasn't biased against you, and now you say that I was a 'shill' for Putin as a moderator. Have you forgotten who instantaneously approved all your requested for approved submitter status, regardless of your opinions? Of course, it was just 90D chess to throw you off your brilliant scent, because I could tell that you were about to blow my FSB cover! But then again, I'm very "stupid" according to you, so how could I play such 90D chess?
Right, you have to wait until kids are 8 before you groom them. Great victory. 10/10.
Someone disagrees with dekachin on the highly improbable and dangerous plot to... blow up Russian citizens in order to justify a highly improbable and unlikely to succeed campaign against Chechnya, so he must be a Russian agent! Brilliantly done.
Well, you did it, because you quoted the New York Times as well as Wikipedia. If you think those sources are reliable, you should check what they write about your beloved Republicans.
It's not nearly enough. Not sure why you persist in such insanity.
I mean, you blew up their pipeline, you forced them to enact sanctions, so yeah. It was you. Your denials are about as credible as you calling me an FSB agent.
So I opposed both of those so idk why youre coming at me with those. In both cases the US was only going along with Euros and willingly acting as their enforcer and muscle so Democrats could ingratiate themselves to the filthy, degenerate, globohomo euros. Clinton bombed Serbia. Obama bombed Libya. I doubt that Trump would have been willing to join the Euros in either endeavor.
But those weren't "wars of aggression" anyway. Serbia was bombed to stop its invasion of Kosovo and to stop a fake genocide that was believed to have been happening. Libya was just a civil war where the Euros + US gave air support to the rebels.
My statement obviously meant "even gullible people would not believe that excuse because it is so obviously bullshit", and you stupidly misread it and assumed I am an idiot who meant to use fastidious or something. Your ego is suffering right now, and you're desperate to cling to anything that will help you feel smarter. It's sad.
You're getting tilted because (1) I've been landing too many hits on your lately, and (2) your Daddy Putin's war is going very poorly and there is a general malaise and frustration among Russian warmongers these days. Losing Izyum was bad, but the shills thought "ok we were caught sleeping, but we will shorten the lines and recover" BUT THEN UKRAINE KEPT ON GOING and now has successfully taken Lyman, with the Russians just getting bitch slapped around now for a month straight with no end in sight.
This must weigh heavily on you and your coworkers.
lolololol I honestly hope you're getting a paycheck for this, bro.
Ehm, you said "the United States opposes wars of aggression".
Clearly not.
Its own country. In which case, Russia bombed Ukraine to stop its invasion of the Donbas.
Now what implications would this have for the Ukraine thing? You don't think things through, do you? I really do hope you serve your clients better than you do your Eyepatch McCain-tier opinions.
Your statement obviously means "no one who is gullible believes this". Again, you try to blame others for your own slip-ups.
Well, this is about as accurate an analysis as I expect from a guy who believes that cricket noises create brain damage...
Dude, I'm not even cross with you, despite all your attempts even way back when on Reddit. You sometimes even manage to make good arguments. At other times, you're just batshit crazy. It's all fine, as you seem well-intentioned to me even when you're wrong (which is often).
LOL! See, I can't even tell if you're joking or legit crazy.
Pretty crazy to think that you could get a paycheck for posting on the internet. But maybe you have personal experience with something I don't. Any Langley statements on your bank account?
You also failed to address the rest of the comment. Must be the first time that you had nothing to say, because you usually make up some BS to say in reply. Did I land one too many hits on you?
Ukraine wasn't invading the Donbass. This is unlike what Russia did in Georgia where they baited the Georgians to attack South Ossetia [who actually started it by shelling the Georgians] as a pretext to attack immediately after staging all their troops right over the border on a pretext of "exercises". By contrast, Ukraine was just minding its own business when Putin launched his naked war of aggression against it in February.
I've told you that is exactly what I intended to say, and yet you refuse to accept it. As I know my mind, and you do not, my statement on the matter is definitive and undisputed. You are not qualified to contradict it. Your little pet theory that I meant to use a different word and meant to convey a different meaning is, quite frankly, a pathetic cope and makes you look like a loser who is tilting.
Cricket noises do not cause brain damage, but pulsed microwave radiation does.
Imp is batshit about women. You are batshit about the US and Putin in general.
It's a very common and open thing with Chinese. Hell, I just got lit up by wumao accounts on reddit yesterday when someone posted that China has the lowest suicide rate in the world and I replied "China also has the lowest COVID rate in the world according to China. LOL." Had wumaos reply saying it's true. LOL. They're either ethnic Han who have been brainwashed into doing it for free out of misguided ethnic tribalism, in which case they're traitors who ought to be deported, OR they're paid members of the 50 cent army.
Russia does the same thing, just on a smaller scale, and they're sneakier about it.
I purposely do not respond when something you wrote is just trivial or bitchy. It clutters up the reply and adds nothing of value. If you write substantive things that I haven't already responded to such that I'd be repeating myself, then I respond.