He believed that and was wrong, sure, but that wasn’t uniquely his brand of crazy, that was a hell of a lot of people that thought—incorrectly, but not entirely without reason—that the covid vaccine was going to do that.
I disagree. Aside from one retard who claimed that the death rate would be 100%, no one had such high estimates. Not only that, this came after most of the world had already been vaccinated.
It's also extremely unlikely. I told Imp at the time that even a 3% death rate would lead to revolutions and firing squads for the ruling classes. I'm very pessimistic (and how can you not be living under the yoke of the globalist elites), but I do know that if you kill 3% of people's friends, relatives, brothers, sisters, parents... that you will not get away with it. Hence there is quite a strong incentive to avoid it. They do not care about killing 3% of their population, but for the fact that it would have negative consequences for themselves.
Not to mention what it looks like when your thesis is “this guy is insane and says wackadoo shit all the time,” but you seemingly can’t find an example from within the past few months.
This was the most absurd one. He hasn't made similar whoppers. He's a bit more careful with his predictions, because he realized that I was challenging him to make predictions which would then prove wrong. Which is good! I don't go around making out there predictions because I'd be easily proven wrong. And even when I do: I say "I could be wrong".
(BTW, I do appreciate this intelligent challenge.)
I suppose they could be long delayed deaths, which would be easier to mask.
In all seriousness though, there were a lot of exaggerations over just how badly things might play out. Not just describing Impossible here, but people I know personally.
I mostly just anticipated a fair bit of risk for potentially long-term negative effects in... I dunno, some small to moderate percentage of the population? Simply because those are things that can be tougher to detect with newer forms of treatment. And past attempts at treating SARS/Covid related viruses have had some baggage with limited success.
I still wouldn't really jump to conclusions of malicious and deliberate attempts or goals though, or at least nothing beyond basic greed, laziness, and incompetence.
Maybe the worst long-term consequence is really the level of state and corporate sponsored control that has been employed across the board. And almost no consequences to those who would push for extreme and dystopian measures.
I suppose they could be long delayed deaths, which would be easier to mask.
It would be brilliant if everyone ended up dying 1 minute before he otherwise would. Then the vaccine would have a 100% death rate and no one would ever find out.
In all seriousness though, there were a lot of exaggerations over just how badly things might play out. Not just describing Impossible here, but people I know personally.
Basically everyone exaggerated. The pro-side kept claiming they were completely safe and what not, and the anti-side was scared of worse than what ultimately ended up happening.
I mostly just anticipated a fair bit of risk for potentially long-term negative effects in... I dunno, some small to moderate percentage of the population?
That was my worry as well. Especially if it is true that the spike protein can remain in your body for a longer period of time than the two weeks initially claimed.
I still wouldn't really jump to conclusions of malicious and deliberate attempts or goals though, or at least nothing beyond basic greed, laziness, and incompetence.
Those things can be assumed, yes. I mostly disagreed with those deliberate attempts claimed by him. That doesn't benefit "them" in any way! He just reads some crazy stuff by crazy feminists and then projects those ideas on every woman he sees, so he's terrified to go through life. I've told him that even the craziest feminists don't want to kill their sons, brothers, fathers (well, many do want to kill their fathers...) - so this makes little sense, but obviously, it has no effect.
Maybe the worst long-term consequence is really the level of state and corporate sponsored control that has been employed across the board. And almost no consequences to those who would push for extreme and dystopian measures.
Precisely. There was just an article on the WEF website about the lessons of corona lockdowns for "climate" nonsense.
Well, usually you'd pen some very poor satire of what I believe...but it doesn't work here.
How is my satire different from what you actually post?
Why? Yet again I've been proven to be right.
What claim has been proven right? That 90% would die of the vaccine. That Kim Potter would never be indicted, then that her picture and name would not be revealed, then that the charges would be quietly dropped, then that she'd only get probation? That male curfew you were panicking about?
I said that's what they wanted,
Don't lie, you did claim that 90% would die of the vaccine. And that they would blame it on a 'new variant' and that no one would question it.
not what would happen. I predicted an exponential growth in line with boosters, which is so far holding up.
The Israeli stuff shows otherwise, but be careful, they are Jooooooz!
I made an account just to tell you that your name is inaccurate, you would be more correct to say the Aldmer are Aryans or perhaps the Ehlnofey depending on how you want to account for the et'Ada. Modern day altmer are ,through the aldmeri dominion, seeking the ancient supremacy of their earlier more mystical and powerful ancestor race and one could even make hyperborea memes but with aldmeris instead and it would fit amusingly.
You are demonstrably crazy. And Julie Bindel doesn't advocate for "male genocide", nor does she have any power. That's just your professional victim complex.
Here's the article: https://archive.ph/Uth5z
These people have issues.
I am?
And I still do.
90% vaccine deaths.
I disagree. Aside from one retard who claimed that the death rate would be 100%, no one had such high estimates. Not only that, this came after most of the world had already been vaccinated.
It's also extremely unlikely. I told Imp at the time that even a 3% death rate would lead to revolutions and firing squads for the ruling classes. I'm very pessimistic (and how can you not be living under the yoke of the globalist elites), but I do know that if you kill 3% of people's friends, relatives, brothers, sisters, parents... that you will not get away with it. Hence there is quite a strong incentive to avoid it. They do not care about killing 3% of their population, but for the fact that it would have negative consequences for themselves.
This was the most absurd one. He hasn't made similar whoppers. He's a bit more careful with his predictions, because he realized that I was challenging him to make predictions which would then prove wrong. Which is good! I don't go around making out there predictions because I'd be easily proven wrong. And even when I do: I say "I could be wrong".
(BTW, I do appreciate this intelligent challenge.)
I suppose they could be long delayed deaths, which would be easier to mask.
In all seriousness though, there were a lot of exaggerations over just how badly things might play out. Not just describing Impossible here, but people I know personally.
I mostly just anticipated a fair bit of risk for potentially long-term negative effects in... I dunno, some small to moderate percentage of the population? Simply because those are things that can be tougher to detect with newer forms of treatment. And past attempts at treating SARS/Covid related viruses have had some baggage with limited success.
I still wouldn't really jump to conclusions of malicious and deliberate attempts or goals though, or at least nothing beyond basic greed, laziness, and incompetence.
Maybe the worst long-term consequence is really the level of state and corporate sponsored control that has been employed across the board. And almost no consequences to those who would push for extreme and dystopian measures.
It would be brilliant if everyone ended up dying 1 minute before he otherwise would. Then the vaccine would have a 100% death rate and no one would ever find out.
Basically everyone exaggerated. The pro-side kept claiming they were completely safe and what not, and the anti-side was scared of worse than what ultimately ended up happening.
That was my worry as well. Especially if it is true that the spike protein can remain in your body for a longer period of time than the two weeks initially claimed.
Those things can be assumed, yes. I mostly disagreed with those deliberate attempts claimed by him. That doesn't benefit "them" in any way! He just reads some crazy stuff by crazy feminists and then projects those ideas on every woman he sees, so he's terrified to go through life. I've told him that even the craziest feminists don't want to kill their sons, brothers, fathers (well, many do want to kill their fathers...) - so this makes little sense, but obviously, it has no effect.
Precisely. There was just an article on the WEF website about the lessons of corona lockdowns for "climate" nonsense.
How is my satire different from what you actually post?
What claim has been proven right? That 90% would die of the vaccine. That Kim Potter would never be indicted, then that her picture and name would not be revealed, then that the charges would be quietly dropped, then that she'd only get probation? That male curfew you were panicking about?
Don't lie, you did claim that 90% would die of the vaccine. And that they would blame it on a 'new variant' and that no one would question it.
The Israeli stuff shows otherwise, but be careful, they are Jooooooz!
I made an account just to tell you that your name is inaccurate, you would be more correct to say the Aldmer are Aryans or perhaps the Ehlnofey depending on how you want to account for the et'Ada. Modern day altmer are ,through the aldmeri dominion, seeking the ancient supremacy of their earlier more mystical and powerful ancestor race and one could even make hyperborea memes but with aldmeris instead and it would fit amusingly.
Can't argue with that...
Big fucking surprise, a horrible cunt is a horrible cunt!
People want to push their goals? No way.
I'll say it again:
Write a novel.
Make a male-genocide-advocating psycho the main villain.
In complete sincerity, I'd love to see what you'd come up with.
You are demonstrably crazy. And Julie Bindel doesn't advocate for "male genocide", nor does she have any power. That's just your professional victim complex.
If?
They might as well not exist. Insignificant.
Feel free to show me.
What is the name of the law? You've already made several false claims about it, for example that it was passed under Theresa May.
She is a GC.
Yet somehow, you can't provide any evidence for it. The womens covered it up using their usual bribes and blackmail?