The woman behind the UK's Coercive Control policy.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
I disagree. Aside from one retard who claimed that the death rate would be 100%, no one had such high estimates. Not only that, this came after most of the world had already been vaccinated.
It's also extremely unlikely. I told Imp at the time that even a 3% death rate would lead to revolutions and firing squads for the ruling classes. I'm very pessimistic (and how can you not be living under the yoke of the globalist elites), but I do know that if you kill 3% of people's friends, relatives, brothers, sisters, parents... that you will not get away with it. Hence there is quite a strong incentive to avoid it. They do not care about killing 3% of their population, but for the fact that it would have negative consequences for themselves.
This was the most absurd one. He hasn't made similar whoppers. He's a bit more careful with his predictions, because he realized that I was challenging him to make predictions which would then prove wrong. Which is good! I don't go around making out there predictions because I'd be easily proven wrong. And even when I do: I say "I could be wrong".
(BTW, I do appreciate this intelligent challenge.)
I suppose they could be long delayed deaths, which would be easier to mask.
In all seriousness though, there were a lot of exaggerations over just how badly things might play out. Not just describing Impossible here, but people I know personally.
I mostly just anticipated a fair bit of risk for potentially long-term negative effects in... I dunno, some small to moderate percentage of the population? Simply because those are things that can be tougher to detect with newer forms of treatment. And past attempts at treating SARS/Covid related viruses have had some baggage with limited success.
I still wouldn't really jump to conclusions of malicious and deliberate attempts or goals though, or at least nothing beyond basic greed, laziness, and incompetence.
Maybe the worst long-term consequence is really the level of state and corporate sponsored control that has been employed across the board. And almost no consequences to those who would push for extreme and dystopian measures.
It would be brilliant if everyone ended up dying 1 minute before he otherwise would. Then the vaccine would have a 100% death rate and no one would ever find out.
Basically everyone exaggerated. The pro-side kept claiming they were completely safe and what not, and the anti-side was scared of worse than what ultimately ended up happening.
That was my worry as well. Especially if it is true that the spike protein can remain in your body for a longer period of time than the two weeks initially claimed.
Those things can be assumed, yes. I mostly disagreed with those deliberate attempts claimed by him. That doesn't benefit "them" in any way! He just reads some crazy stuff by crazy feminists and then projects those ideas on every woman he sees, so he's terrified to go through life. I've told him that even the craziest feminists don't want to kill their sons, brothers, fathers (well, many do want to kill their fathers...) - so this makes little sense, but obviously, it has no effect.
Precisely. There was just an article on the WEF website about the lessons of corona lockdowns for "climate" nonsense.