Corporate Needs You to Find the Differences Between This Picture and This Picture
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Hell, there is evidence that suggest that the surgeries have in many cases actively made the gender dysphoria worse.
Red Pill: That's because the surgeries gave gender dysphoria to people who didn't have it, but were told they did because it was the best way to permanently monetize people with depression as perpetual medical patients.
One of my most controversial takes, that I think is really our society's darkest truth is that most trans people didn't have gender dypshoria, and most gays are heterosexual. Gender Dysphorics and Homosexuals exist, but are probably in the same 0.5% and 1% number that we would see naturally occurring in a non-pathological culture.
Agreed. Surgery fanboys (what a category to have) are seizing upon the vast group of troubled teenagers and, because they're ideologically motivated to do so, trying to con as many of these troubled teenagers as they can that whatever troubled the teenager, the solution is to start cutting, because this is how they reproduce.
Once they have ruined the teenager's body they're in - it's very hard to take a step back at this point, and, with a bit more grooming, all the anger and hatred the teenager feels can be directed outward - at conning the next generation of teenagers into ruining their bodies.
Not contesting that take. I guess the one good thing is that we are kind of starting to see the slide back. Because a lot of normal people are disgusted by the rampant attempts at trans-ing the kids. And a lot of people are starting to realize the whole movement is toxic, which I chalk up as the reason that you are seeing LGBT acceptance rates decline (especially rapidly among young people).
Could you explain your reasoning on this?
I believe their argument is that homosexuality is primarily a social construct, not a biological one. "Gays" would, by this argument, be initially heterosexual, but raised/groomed/cultured/socialized into being gay.
Ironically, also the argument of "one billion genders" people, since obviously one cannot be biologically homosexual if the concept of discrete same genders was so diluted as to be nonexistent.
The gender stuff is so nonsensical to me that I can't help but instantly dismiss every idea/argument that gets attached to it.
From what I've seen, I can at least say that homosexuality is often a fad (I guess that'd count as a social construct). I see it a lot in kids and immature adults. The way it gets flaunted and displayed, that's not how a sexuality presents itself normally.
We could perhaps make a supply/demand argument as well for homosexuality. Low supply of decent females. And a lot of homosexuals strongly desire hetero partners for whatever reason, so that's a high demand from them.
Sort of, but not quite. I'll come back later.