Corporate Needs You to Find the Differences Between This Picture and This Picture
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
I believe their argument is that homosexuality is primarily a social construct, not a biological one. "Gays" would, by this argument, be initially heterosexual, but raised/groomed/cultured/socialized into being gay.
Ironically, also the argument of "one billion genders" people, since obviously one cannot be biologically homosexual if the concept of discrete same genders was so diluted as to be nonexistent.
The gender stuff is so nonsensical to me that I can't help but instantly dismiss every idea/argument that gets attached to it.
From what I've seen, I can at least say that homosexuality is often a fad (I guess that'd count as a social construct). I see it a lot in kids and immature adults. The way it gets flaunted and displayed, that's not how a sexuality presents itself normally.
We could perhaps make a supply/demand argument as well for homosexuality. Low supply of decent females. And a lot of homosexuals strongly desire hetero partners for whatever reason, so that's a high demand from them.
Sort of, but not quite. I'll come back later.