It's just a lie. They don't even have capital punishment at all, only the enemy have it.
Anyone can easily check this out, so I don't know why Imp insists on lying really stupidly even after I told him it's not true. He could easily check it too, but no. Unless he did, and now is just being weird, I don't know.
They don't even have capital punishment at all, only the enemy have it.
You mean the People's Republics, right? Because Russia also has abolished the death penalty, thank you Western organizations.
Anyone can easily check this out, so I don't know why Imp insists on lying really stupidly even after I told him it's not true.
This the first time you encountered him or something?
He'll convince himself of something - anything - and then be hell-bent on pushing it, no matter how much evidence against it emerges.
When a woman shot a black guy (of whom he claimed that she was looking for an opportunity to kill a man), he first said that her name would not be released, and that her picture would not be posted. When proven false, he said that she would never be indicted. When she was indicted, he'd say that the prosecution would look for a quiet way to drop the charges. When that didn't happen, he said she'd get only probation. When she got 2 years in prison, he declared victory because it was 2 years + probation.
Like him or dislike him, at least he is incredibly entertaining.
Well, that ought to convince citizens of the righteousness of their sacrifice.
It's just a lie. They don't even have capital punishment at all, only the enemy have it.
Anyone can easily check this out, so I don't know why Imp insists on lying really stupidly even after I told him it's not true. He could easily check it too, but no. Unless he did, and now is just being weird, I don't know.
You mean the People's Republics, right? Because Russia also has abolished the death penalty, thank you Western organizations.
This the first time you encountered him or something?
He'll convince himself of something - anything - and then be hell-bent on pushing it, no matter how much evidence against it emerges.
When a woman shot a black guy (of whom he claimed that she was looking for an opportunity to kill a man), he first said that her name would not be released, and that her picture would not be posted. When proven false, he said that she would never be indicted. When she was indicted, he'd say that the prosecution would look for a quiet way to drop the charges. When that didn't happen, he said she'd get only probation. When she got 2 years in prison, he declared victory because it was 2 years + probation.
Like him or dislike him, at least he is incredibly entertaining.
The moratorium does not mean "abolished", and I very clearly wrote how they're lifting it now.
Or at least so says Medvedev, whom this forum for some reason called a "Russian moderate" once (https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15IEXz4p5Z/even-the-russian-moderates-hate-/c/).
His redemption arc was crazy.
Do you really need me to explain like to a retard how " a deputy proposed" does not mean "passed a law"?