FYI - he is not a medical doctor - he is a doctor of nursing studies or something. But he has studied more medicine than any of the pharma shills on reddit hating on him!
I've been watching his videos for probably over a year now; he's been absolutely pro-vax, but he's also done a good job of just finding data and studies and reporting on them without an agenda. He's also interviewed several people with jab-related injuries and fully acknowledged that there are risks.
When the FOIA requests regarding the Pfizer data that the FDA made its decisions on got a hold of the pages and pages of possible side effects and showed that the rates of these weren't trivial, he did a video on it. It honestly was difficult to watch because he looked and sounded like a man whose faith had just been shattered.
Well even before that FOIA, he's always felt that the WHO and CDC has been doing it wrong with treating COVID. He explored stuff like ivermectin and hcq, and much like Bret Weinstein he thinks that these organizations are costing people's lives by refusing to use them as antiviral treatments.
He's consistently been advocating for things that work, and if it stops working, he will speak out against it. The data has shown the vaccines stopped working, and thanks to him I learned very quickly why the vaccines don't work anymore, and he's absolutely baffled that kids are getting vaccinated.
It's kind of sad that this guy is just practicing good, ethical, honest inquiry and it stands out so much.
I want to also take a chance to praise the NHS because their data is as transparent as I could ask for. Yes, there's still the whole "with" vs. "because of" thing but the excess mortality data does do a good job of illustrating that excess deaths did go down following the rollout of the heart stoppers.
It also illustrates that efficacy wanes in a matter of weeks/months and then excess "sudden" deaths start, so I still wouldn't go near those shots with a 10-foot pole -- but I just thought that was interesting. Good job, NHS.
Yep, and the vaccines absolutely cannot stop infection anymore. The best defense against it is doing shit that would help you from getting sick in general - eat well, exercise, get fresh air/vitamin D, etc.
The lack of any kind of guidance regarding that drives him absolutely nuts.
But people have to understand that the rapid explosion of nurse practitioners is a dilution of training and credentials designed to reduce the quality and critical thinking in medical care to the general pop.
Another analogy would be deciding to make flight attendants full service pilots because they got to sit in the cockpit a few times.
The future involves you and I receiving substandard, paint-by-number medical care from imposters while the elites who can afford it get concierge treatment from real doctors.
Nurse practitioners can handle almost any patient who walks into an urgent care or family doctors office. They aren't as qualified as doctors, but describing their knowledge base as paint by numbers medical care, or getting an online degree from University of Phoenix is just not based in reality.
But your larger point is likely correct. If the medical establishment is pushing for something, it's probably not a good thing for us plebs.
I appreciate you ceding at least some middle ground.
Of course my analogies contain some hyperbole in the aims of being derogatory.
My point is that the its a complete lie that they are selling us that you can create competent "doctor-lite" equivalents out of your average nurse simply by taking a few online courses or following a doctor around for a few months.
Your average nurse, will all due respect, is a moron. The barrier to entry to nursing training is very low. They are trained to follow orders and to conform to the weird feminized social structures created by the culture.
I would also refute the claim that your average NP "can handle" almost any GP or urgent care patient that walks through the door.
The fact that they ARE serving in these roles doesn't mean that they SHOULD be or do it competently.
Primary care in the US and Canada is poorly compensated and shat on constantly. But when you have underqualified and inexperienced people like NPs, putting in settings where undifferentiated patients with the entire breadth of medical possibilities may darken their doors is a bad idea.
There's actually a better argument to make NPs into physician extenders for specialists, where patients are already triaged, you get referred the same limited scope of conditions over and over and much of the care is akin to making widgets.
FYI - he is not a medical doctor - he is a doctor of nursing studies or something. But he has studied more medicine than any of the pharma shills on reddit hating on him!
I've been watching his videos for probably over a year now; he's been absolutely pro-vax, but he's also done a good job of just finding data and studies and reporting on them without an agenda. He's also interviewed several people with jab-related injuries and fully acknowledged that there are risks.
When the FOIA requests regarding the Pfizer data that the FDA made its decisions on got a hold of the pages and pages of possible side effects and showed that the rates of these weren't trivial, he did a video on it. It honestly was difficult to watch because he looked and sounded like a man whose faith had just been shattered.
Well even before that FOIA, he's always felt that the WHO and CDC has been doing it wrong with treating COVID. He explored stuff like ivermectin and hcq, and much like Bret Weinstein he thinks that these organizations are costing people's lives by refusing to use them as antiviral treatments.
He's consistently been advocating for things that work, and if it stops working, he will speak out against it. The data has shown the vaccines stopped working, and thanks to him I learned very quickly why the vaccines don't work anymore, and he's absolutely baffled that kids are getting vaccinated.
It's kind of sad that this guy is just practicing good, ethical, honest inquiry and it stands out so much.
I want to also take a chance to praise the NHS because their data is as transparent as I could ask for. Yes, there's still the whole "with" vs. "because of" thing but the excess mortality data does do a good job of illustrating that excess deaths did go down following the rollout of the heart stoppers.
It also illustrates that efficacy wanes in a matter of weeks/months and then excess "sudden" deaths start, so I still wouldn't go near those shots with a 10-foot pole -- but I just thought that was interesting. Good job, NHS.
Yep, and the vaccines absolutely cannot stop infection anymore. The best defense against it is doing shit that would help you from getting sick in general - eat well, exercise, get fresh air/vitamin D, etc.
The lack of any kind of guidance regarding that drives him absolutely nuts.
He has a PhD in "Nursing" apparently.
thanks!
I didn't notice that you mentioned it already in your OP.
Reading comprehension fail!
He's a nurse practitioner. He's not an academic that just sits in the ivory tower and laughs at the plebs. He's treated many patients before.
Being a nurse practitioner isn't a point in his favour.
Getting your NP certification is the medical equivalent of becoming a doctor through correspondence from the University of Phoenix.
That's not true at all lol
I personally have nothing against John Campbell.
But people have to understand that the rapid explosion of nurse practitioners is a dilution of training and credentials designed to reduce the quality and critical thinking in medical care to the general pop.
Another analogy would be deciding to make flight attendants full service pilots because they got to sit in the cockpit a few times.
The future involves you and I receiving substandard, paint-by-number medical care from imposters while the elites who can afford it get concierge treatment from real doctors.
Nurse practitioners can handle almost any patient who walks into an urgent care or family doctors office. They aren't as qualified as doctors, but describing their knowledge base as paint by numbers medical care, or getting an online degree from University of Phoenix is just not based in reality.
But your larger point is likely correct. If the medical establishment is pushing for something, it's probably not a good thing for us plebs.
I appreciate you ceding at least some middle ground.
Of course my analogies contain some hyperbole in the aims of being derogatory.
My point is that the its a complete lie that they are selling us that you can create competent "doctor-lite" equivalents out of your average nurse simply by taking a few online courses or following a doctor around for a few months.
Your average nurse, will all due respect, is a moron. The barrier to entry to nursing training is very low. They are trained to follow orders and to conform to the weird feminized social structures created by the culture.
I would also refute the claim that your average NP "can handle" almost any GP or urgent care patient that walks through the door.
The fact that they ARE serving in these roles doesn't mean that they SHOULD be or do it competently.
Primary care in the US and Canada is poorly compensated and shat on constantly. But when you have underqualified and inexperienced people like NPs, putting in settings where undifferentiated patients with the entire breadth of medical possibilities may darken their doors is a bad idea.
There's actually a better argument to make NPs into physician extenders for specialists, where patients are already triaged, you get referred the same limited scope of conditions over and over and much of the care is akin to making widgets.
So you're saying he's as much of a doctor as Jill Biden, wife of El Generalisimo