Here's the thing I always ask people who push the "vaccine":
Have you ever heard of another vaccine that doesn't prevent you from contracting the illness you're vaccinated against and only relieves symptoms? Have you ever heard of another vaccine that public health authorities say that everyone has to get it for it to work?
The answer is "no" to both, because that's not how vaccines work. And they know this, because when they first rolled it out they advertised that it worked exactly like all the other vaccines. Then, when it became clear that it didn't work, they pivoted to the "but you won't get as sick argument" which is now repeated like a religious chant yet no one has ever presented any evidence to me supporting it.
Then, when it became clear that it didn't work, they pivoted to the "but you won't get as sick argument" which is now repeated like a religious chant yet no one has ever presented any evidence to me supporting it.
As you say there's basically negative evidence supporting that claim, but I never cared because it was always a retarded defence. As soon as it was clear the jabs didn't impede transmission they should have been a busted flush.
'They reduce symptoms' is damage control script only repeated by absolute midwits or evil people trying to recruit them, because you should not necessarily even WANT the vaccine to reduce symptoms, if it's clear that they are not reducing transmission. Symptoms are a signal to the sufferer and to everyone around them that that person is infectious - if you shrink that signal while causing people to remain equally infectious (or moreso, which is a tested consequence of the jabs), then there's an extremely good chance that you're increasing the scale of infection. Especially if you're using jabbie status as the sole prerequisite for allowing people to go about an unrestricted life.
Reducing hospitalisation for individuals by some modest fraction while creating 10x more infections means more net hospitalisations - and if it's really true that they ever did reduce symptoms, then the scale of vaccinated infection must have been truly massive, since that would mean the vaccinated majority in hospitals must only be the tip of the iceberg.
And that's just how retarded the best, boldest, basic argument made in defence of the jabs is these days. They look far worse when you factor in how the stats have been hidden and played with, how definitions of 'vaccinated' have been fucked with, and when you look at all the health detriments which are verboten to talk about except in whispers on fringe sites.
It's worse than that. Getting it but not getting as sick is the exact how you'd set up a situation for the virus to evolve around whatever protection the injection is meant to be providing.
Yep, it's always worse. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten that one in my bandolier. When vaxxies try and claim credit for the lower case fatality rate compared to 2020, the answer is 'oh so you're taking credit for Delta and Omicron? finally admit that the vaccine turns you into a variant factory?' Anyone who hasn't rejected the principle of natural selection knows that to be the case anyway (although there's a good case for the fact that Omicron was some sort of white hat leak).
Have you ever heard of another vaccine that doesn't prevent you from contracting the illness you're vaccinated against
Yes, a lot of vaccines are leaky. This one is just worse than most, probably because they keep forcing the original vaccine on us even though the virus has evolved.
Have you ever heard of another vaccine that public health authorities say that everyone has to get it for it to work?
Public health authorities are corrupt as hell, there's no doubt about that.
they pivoted to the "but you won't get as sick argument" which is now repeated like a religious chant yet no one has ever presented any evidence to me supporting it.
I think the point is that when confronted on their bullshit they continuously move the goal posts from "nothing bad will happen to you if you just get the jab" straight over to "well you probably won't die and you won't feel as sick" which is basically fucking useless to the normal person.
It's misinformation and a conspiracy theory right until the moment that they can no longer deny it. And when that happens, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia... again.
The jab prevents infection and transmission.
The jab prevents infection.
The jab prevents deaths when infected.
The jab reduces deaths and symptoms when infected.
The jab reduces symptoms when infected.
The jab inspires happy happy joy joy feelings in everyone.
The jab gets you an express ticket to heaven.
The mark upon your right arm enables you to engage in commerce.
Here's the thing I always ask people who push the "vaccine":
The answer is "no" to both, because that's not how vaccines work. And they know this, because when they first rolled it out they advertised that it worked exactly like all the other vaccines. Then, when it became clear that it didn't work, they pivoted to the "but you won't get as sick argument" which is now repeated like a religious chant yet no one has ever presented any evidence to me supporting it.
As you say there's basically negative evidence supporting that claim, but I never cared because it was always a retarded defence. As soon as it was clear the jabs didn't impede transmission they should have been a busted flush.
'They reduce symptoms' is damage control script only repeated by absolute midwits or evil people trying to recruit them, because you should not necessarily even WANT the vaccine to reduce symptoms, if it's clear that they are not reducing transmission. Symptoms are a signal to the sufferer and to everyone around them that that person is infectious - if you shrink that signal while causing people to remain equally infectious (or moreso, which is a tested consequence of the jabs), then there's an extremely good chance that you're increasing the scale of infection. Especially if you're using jabbie status as the sole prerequisite for allowing people to go about an unrestricted life.
Reducing hospitalisation for individuals by some modest fraction while creating 10x more infections means more net hospitalisations - and if it's really true that they ever did reduce symptoms, then the scale of vaccinated infection must have been truly massive, since that would mean the vaccinated majority in hospitals must only be the tip of the iceberg.
And that's just how retarded the best, boldest, basic argument made in defence of the jabs is these days. They look far worse when you factor in how the stats have been hidden and played with, how definitions of 'vaccinated' have been fucked with, and when you look at all the health detriments which are verboten to talk about except in whispers on fringe sites.
It's worse than that. Getting it but not getting as sick is the exact how you'd set up a situation for the virus to evolve around whatever protection the injection is meant to be providing.
Yep, it's always worse. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten that one in my bandolier. When vaxxies try and claim credit for the lower case fatality rate compared to 2020, the answer is 'oh so you're taking credit for Delta and Omicron? finally admit that the vaccine turns you into a variant factory?' Anyone who hasn't rejected the principle of natural selection knows that to be the case anyway (although there's a good case for the fact that Omicron was some sort of white hat leak).
Yes, a lot of vaccines are leaky. This one is just worse than most, probably because they keep forcing the original vaccine on us even though the virus has evolved.
Public health authorities are corrupt as hell, there's no doubt about that.
To you personally?
I think the point is that when confronted on their bullshit they continuously move the goal posts from "nothing bad will happen to you if you just get the jab" straight over to "well you probably won't die and you won't feel as sick" which is basically fucking useless to the normal person.
https://nitter.eu/maxblumenthal/status/1544916057361682434?s=21
It's misinformation and a conspiracy theory right until the moment that they can no longer deny it. And when that happens, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia... again.