Their twin desires to persecute men and shield women from any negative consequences whatsoever from their bad decisions is coming into conflict. That's all this is.
Democrats, surprisingly, aren't 100% in support of letting whores loiter on sidewalks.
As with many things they promote, "supporting sex workers" is all well and good until those sex workers are out on the sidewalk in front of your doorstop attracting crime and making your neighborhood (more of) a shithole.
Prostitution is a fun discussion topic because there's no position you can take on it that isn't anti feminism in some way. It divides Democrats and feminists because you can't take a position on prostitution without violating one of 2 fundamental tenets of feminism:
1: Women should be allowed to do whatever they want without negative consequences be they legal, financial, or social.
2: Men are subhuman and any policy that benefits them is a crime against feminism.
Opposing prostitution violates the first tenet and supporting it violates the second tenet. They try to square that circle by making it a crime to buy sex but not sell it. Even this is only a partial solution to their problem because it costs the woman money if the man is arrested and not purchasing her services. So it still violates the first tenet to a certain extent. Like I said this is a fun discussion topic because you can get feminists to violate their rotten ideology regardless of which position they take. You gotta word it in feminist jargon to really fuck with them though.
Right. Men don't get any more benefit out of OF than they would from a free porn site, but they're paying out the nose in the case of OF. So it's a worse deal for men and free money for the ethot. Naturally feminists love it. But they only encourage it. The hordes of esimps are what make it a viable business model. I don't begrudge men who hire hookers. They're getting something for their money, and it's a far better deal than a betabux relationshit. The esimps on the other hand are a huge problem. They don't make the thots work for their money and they become even more entitled, further destroying intergender relations.
Advocates for the measure argued that law enforcement uses California's loitering rules to disproportionately target Black, brown and transgender Californians
Of course. It's all about race and trannies. Anyone who prowls the streets for hookers is a retard but predatory trannies looking to trap those retards should still be taken off the streets. They should also be treated like the sex offenders they are but of course that will never happen in Clown World.
This is because even though there are more white whores, they tend to have more self-respect and a greater value, allowing them to not have to result to the easiest yet most dangerous method of selling their asses, walking the streets.
Right. The higher class white ones have websites and charge way more in exchange for a much better experience. The ghetto minority whores aren't worth that so they just do it on the streets for cheap, and it comes with a free helping of gonorrhea. The trannies have negative value to anyone who isn't a degenerate and they walk the streets as part their degenerate fetish. It also allows for trapping, another part of their disgusting fetish.
Advocates for the measure argued that law enforcement uses California's loitering rules to disproportionately target Black, brown and transgender Californians
Nobody "targets" them. Street walking whores are mostly black, hispanic, and/or trannies.
This would just legalize street-walking whores, but prostitution itself would still be illegal under Penal Code 647(b)
Their twin desires to persecute men and shield women from any negative consequences whatsoever from their bad decisions is coming into conflict. That's all this is.
Considering the buyers tend to be men, this makes perfect sense.
Unfortunately there are many countries where this is already the case.
As with many things they promote, "supporting sex workers" is all well and good until those sex workers are out on the sidewalk in front of your doorstop attracting crime and making your neighborhood (more of) a shithole.
Prostitution is a fun discussion topic because there's no position you can take on it that isn't anti feminism in some way. It divides Democrats and feminists because you can't take a position on prostitution without violating one of 2 fundamental tenets of feminism:
1: Women should be allowed to do whatever they want without negative consequences be they legal, financial, or social.
2: Men are subhuman and any policy that benefits them is a crime against feminism.
Opposing prostitution violates the first tenet and supporting it violates the second tenet. They try to square that circle by making it a crime to buy sex but not sell it. Even this is only a partial solution to their problem because it costs the woman money if the man is arrested and not purchasing her services. So it still violates the first tenet to a certain extent. Like I said this is a fun discussion topic because you can get feminists to violate their rotten ideology regardless of which position they take. You gotta word it in feminist jargon to really fuck with them though.
Those tenets must be why they have the double-standard of permitting OnlyFans but not porn sites.
Right. Men don't get any more benefit out of OF than they would from a free porn site, but they're paying out the nose in the case of OF. So it's a worse deal for men and free money for the ethot. Naturally feminists love it. But they only encourage it. The hordes of esimps are what make it a viable business model. I don't begrudge men who hire hookers. They're getting something for their money, and it's a far better deal than a betabux relationshit. The esimps on the other hand are a huge problem. They don't make the thots work for their money and they become even more entitled, further destroying intergender relations.
Of course. It's all about race and trannies. Anyone who prowls the streets for hookers is a retard but predatory trannies looking to trap those retards should still be taken off the streets. They should also be treated like the sex offenders they are but of course that will never happen in Clown World.
This is because even though there are more white whores, they tend to have more self-respect and a greater value, allowing them to not have to result to the easiest yet most dangerous method of selling their asses, walking the streets.
Right. The higher class white ones have websites and charge way more in exchange for a much better experience. The ghetto minority whores aren't worth that so they just do it on the streets for cheap, and it comes with a free helping of gonorrhea. The trannies have negative value to anyone who isn't a degenerate and they walk the streets as part their degenerate fetish. It also allows for trapping, another part of their disgusting fetish.
Nobody "targets" them. Street walking whores are mostly black, hispanic, and/or trannies.
This would just legalize street-walking whores, but prostitution itself would still be illegal under Penal Code 647(b)