Prostitution is a fun discussion topic because there's no position you can take on it that isn't anti feminism in some way. It divides Democrats and feminists because you can't take a position on prostitution without violating one of 2 fundamental tenets of feminism:
1: Women should be allowed to do whatever they want without negative consequences be they legal, financial, or social.
2: Men are subhuman and any policy that benefits them is a crime against feminism.
Opposing prostitution violates the first tenet and supporting it violates the second tenet. They try to square that circle by making it a crime to buy sex but not sell it. Even this is only a partial solution to their problem because it costs the woman money if the man is arrested and not purchasing her services. So it still violates the first tenet to a certain extent. Like I said this is a fun discussion topic because you can get feminists to violate their rotten ideology regardless of which position they take. You gotta word it in feminist jargon to really fuck with them though.
Right. Men don't get any more benefit out of OF than they would from a free porn site, but they're paying out the nose in the case of OF. So it's a worse deal for men and free money for the ethot. Naturally feminists love it. But they only encourage it. The hordes of esimps are what make it a viable business model. I don't begrudge men who hire hookers. They're getting something for their money, and it's a far better deal than a betabux relationshit. The esimps on the other hand are a huge problem. They don't make the thots work for their money and they become even more entitled, further destroying intergender relations.
Prostitution is a fun discussion topic because there's no position you can take on it that isn't anti feminism in some way. It divides Democrats and feminists because you can't take a position on prostitution without violating one of 2 fundamental tenets of feminism:
1: Women should be allowed to do whatever they want without negative consequences be they legal, financial, or social.
2: Men are subhuman and any policy that benefits them is a crime against feminism.
Opposing prostitution violates the first tenet and supporting it violates the second tenet. They try to square that circle by making it a crime to buy sex but not sell it. Even this is only a partial solution to their problem because it costs the woman money if the man is arrested and not purchasing her services. So it still violates the first tenet to a certain extent. Like I said this is a fun discussion topic because you can get feminists to violate their rotten ideology regardless of which position they take. You gotta word it in feminist jargon to really fuck with them though.
Those tenets must be why they have the double-standard of permitting OnlyFans but not porn sites.
Right. Men don't get any more benefit out of OF than they would from a free porn site, but they're paying out the nose in the case of OF. So it's a worse deal for men and free money for the ethot. Naturally feminists love it. But they only encourage it. The hordes of esimps are what make it a viable business model. I don't begrudge men who hire hookers. They're getting something for their money, and it's a far better deal than a betabux relationshit. The esimps on the other hand are a huge problem. They don't make the thots work for their money and they become even more entitled, further destroying intergender relations.