Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

99
Made me chuckle (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 4 years ago by youtube_admin 4 years ago by youtube_admin +99 / -0
16 comments download share
16 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 22 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

They always hated Clarence Thomas the most because he is a Black conservative.

The left thinks they own all minorities.

They are also seething that Clarence Thomas's concurrence in the Dobbs case talks about potentially re-assessing the gay marriage precedent(Obergefell v Hobbes) and unrestricted birth control precedent (Griswold v Connecticut ) and maybe even overturning them.

The overturning of those two cases sadly won't happen because Roberts, and Gorsuch won't ever go for it.

Gorsuch in the Bostock case shows us that he will never overturn when it comes to these two cases.

Roberts didn't even overturn Roe so he clearly won't be overturning Griswold or Obergefell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

They always hated Clarence Thomas the most because he is a Black conservative.

Of course, but it surprised me how much hatred he got in this particular case. I would expect them to hate on Barrett more.

The left thinks they own all minorities.

I was reading something about Thomas, which said something like "Clarence Thomas opposes affirmative action despite benefiting from it".

So if you 'benefit' from something you did not ask for, you have to do the radical left's bidding in perpetuity.

I'm so glad I have not received this poisoned chalice myself.

Gorsuch in the Bostock case shows us that he will never overturn when it comes to these two cases.

I'm trying to be optimistic. Gorsuch went full retard in that case, but that hinged on the application of the definition of 'sex' IIRC. It does not require him to say that either homosexual marriage or sodomy are protected by any right to 'privacy'.

Roberts didn't even overturn Roe so he clearly won't be overturning Griswold or Obergefell.

Roberts was in the minority in the latter, so there is hope. As for the former, I don't think a case will come that will allow it to be overruled. So basically, it will remain as a zombie precedent that it thoroughly undermined, but without it being overruled entirely.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TakenusernameA 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

The fact that they claim Thomas "benefitted from affirmative action" shows how vile they are to begin with. They assume every black man in power is in their because they rigged the system for blacks. Thomas was fought tooth and nail at every turn by Former Vice President Joe Biden. during his confirmation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– You_Are_Based 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Based and well written reply pilled

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– TakenusernameA 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Those two cases are completely unconstitutional and the fact that the they were even allowed to pass at all shows that Thomas and Alito are the only ones who actually know what their job entails.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Auntie_Mildred 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

The other judges know exactly why they were appointed and it's NOT to uphold the constitution...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– joeyjojoshabadoo1 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I'd go further than unconstitutional and call them outright anti-Constitutional. They turn the Constitution into a magic 8-ball held behind the backs of Supreme Court Justices. It's carte blanche to give whatever decision they want. All they have to do is say "WE MUST CONSULT THE ORACLE" then jabber about shadows and portents, and precedent automatically agrees, because precedent is the card from Parks & Recreation that says "I can do what I want."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy