The purpose of "green energy" is to create a low-maintenance infrastructure that can support a few technocrat families after a collapse. The "green" part is a pretext for mobilizing and expending the effort and resources of civilization toward a hidden goal that assumes the vast majority of the "little" people will die of starvation and disease.
The "elites" will get to enjoy a planet free from the "gross" and demanding work like extracting resources from nature, and don't have to share it with the disgusting and contemptible masses.
Funny... I'm in my mid 40's now and I know a couple of life long child-free feminists who are just hitting 40 and are starting to say things like "you know, it wouldn't be so bad if I was to have a kid".
Sorry ladies, you missed your chance. It's cats for you.
Which is why Globalhomo and Big Oil created the "Environmental" movement to ensure that it would never reach its true potential.
They want everyone dependent on them for power, and nuclear would allow for city states to become independent of the globalist controlled oil and rare metal trades.
The level of illiteracy concerning nuclear power in the anglosphere infuriates me to no end.
I try my best to empathize with other people, but when your immediate response is to recoil in disgust at the mere mention of words like "radiation" or "chemical," I seriously question your usefulness to the continuation of the human endeavor.
You are thinking about it wrong.
The purpose of "green energy" is to create a low-maintenance infrastructure that can support a few technocrat families after a collapse. The "green" part is a pretext for mobilizing and expending the effort and resources of civilization toward a hidden goal that assumes the vast majority of the "little" people will die of starvation and disease.
The "elites" will get to enjoy a planet free from the "gross" and demanding work like extracting resources from nature, and don't have to share it with the disgusting and contemptible masses.
Goats for the peasants are good enough, while we sip on champagne in our glass houses in the Alps.
Not with our current population numbers...
Funny... I'm in my mid 40's now and I know a couple of life long child-free feminists who are just hitting 40 and are starting to say things like "you know, it wouldn't be so bad if I was to have a kid".
Sorry ladies, you missed your chance. It's cats for you.
Except for Nuclear.
Which is why Globalhomo and Big Oil created the "Environmental" movement to ensure that it would never reach its true potential.
They want everyone dependent on them for power, and nuclear would allow for city states to become independent of the globalist controlled oil and rare metal trades.
The level of illiteracy concerning nuclear power in the anglosphere infuriates me to no end.
I try my best to empathize with other people, but when your immediate response is to recoil in disgust at the mere mention of words like "radiation" or "chemical," I seriously question your usefulness to the continuation of the human endeavor.
How did public schools fail this hard?
Fail?
Public Indoctrination Centers did exactly what they were designed to.
Shit...you're right...
Public schools suffer from a lack of gatekeeping. Morons abound. And I don't mean the kids.
Nuclear would, but they conveniently ignore that.