Russia and Ukraine normally supply about 40 percent of wheat needs in Africa, where prices for the grain have risen 23 percent in the past year, the United Nations says. In the Horn of Africa region, a devastating drought has left 17 million people hungry, mostly in parts of Somalia, Ethiopia and Kenya, according to the United Nations. More than 200,000 people in Somalia are on the brink of famine.
The BLM USG now demands that they starve:
In mid-May, the United States sent an alert to 14 countries, mostly in Africa, that Russian cargo vessels were leaving ports near Ukraine laden with what a State Department cable described as “stolen Ukrainian grain.” The cable identified by name three Russian cargo vessels it said were suspected of transporting it.
"pls starve for our Nazi puppets, blackies"
It's rejected though.
“This is not a dilemma,” Mr. Khannenje said. “Africans don’t care where they get their food from, and if someone is going to moralize about that, they are mistaken.”
“The need for food is so severe,” he added, “that it’s not something they need to debate.”
It's probably because some of these African countries had good relations with the Trump administration, and appreciate a lack of American meddling (and a bulwark against the Chinese Road & Bridge Program).
In response, just like any Trump supporter, you get to watch your family starve to death and die.
The Chinese/Turkey road and rail program could certainly be faster but it does exist and is employing plenty and making a difference (In central East Africa at least).
Maybe your people shouldn't have bred like rabbits in a part of the world where it's impossible to even feed your own people without a trillion dollars stolen from Whitey?
Funny that. America has the capacity, but the corporate farms here don't seem to provide at nearly a rate comparable to either Russia or Ukraine. It's almost like this whole thing is about market share.
Not a word from you to criticize how "RF demands that Africans starve for its empire, rather than take grain from Ukraine" (by the means of naval embargo against the Ukrainian exports)?
Isn't blockading ports pretty standard in times of war? That's the 'problem' with most of what Russia is doing - it's just business as usual. How can you criticize something that has been done since time immemorial, including by some of the powers who now whine about Russia.
On the other hand, what the US is doing is pretty extraordinary, trying to cancel an entire country, and engaging in what I see as economic terrorism.
The BLM USG now demands that they starve:
"pls starve for our Nazi puppets, blackies"
It's rejected though.
It's probably because some of these African countries had good relations with the Trump administration, and appreciate a lack of American meddling (and a bulwark against the Chinese Road & Bridge Program).
In response, just like any Trump supporter, you get to watch your family starve to death and die.
The Chinese/Turkey road and rail program could certainly be faster but it does exist and is employing plenty and making a difference (In central East Africa at least).
Employing plenty of Africans or plenty of Chinese?
It's all so tiresome.
It's making a ton of difference:
It's giving China a whole swath of debt slaves and vassal states in Africa.
Based response from the Africans. As if they are going to allow people to starve for the vertue signal.
It's honestly fucking discusting they where ever asked too
African governments are already starving their peoples.
But I suppose that can be said for any government anywhere.
This wouldn't in any way be a feeble effort at retribution for the African governments derailing the WHO Medical Imperialism Treaty.
Maybe your people shouldn't have bred like rabbits in a part of the world where it's impossible to even feed your own people without a trillion dollars stolen from Whitey?
This is a self correcting problem.
Funny that. America has the capacity, but the corporate farms here don't seem to provide at nearly a rate comparable to either Russia or Ukraine. It's almost like this whole thing is about market share.
Not a word from you to criticize how "RF demands that Africans starve for its empire, rather than take grain from Ukraine" (by the means of naval embargo against the Ukrainian exports)?
Isn't blockading ports pretty standard in times of war? That's the 'problem' with most of what Russia is doing - it's just business as usual. How can you criticize something that has been done since time immemorial, including by some of the powers who now whine about Russia.
On the other hand, what the US is doing is pretty extraordinary, trying to cancel an entire country, and engaging in what I see as economic terrorism.
Just business as usual, canceling an entire continent by mass starvation: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6zRj1dfUbb4
According to this article, Russia has been trying to send/sell grain to those countries, and the US is saying "no, pls starve instead, Russia bad".
Oh, so you don't have a problem with Russia starving Africa by force. OK.
Also their war disrupted this year's sowing and will disrupt the harvests too.
Well yeah, that is what war does, and has always done, unfortunately.