There is no way a single individual woman could ever do anything good, it must be part of some borg bullshit, because you just hate us all so much you can't even imagine the possibility of ANY woman EVER doing anything.
It's much more likely that every single case of a woman being good was part of some massive conspiracy that does everything.
This also ties in to you also claiming every instance of something bad happening to a woman is a false flag. Aaaand also into the fact that every pedo/lunatic troon is also a feminist false flag.
You always say your paranoid visions are totes mcgoats right and "all the pieces are there", but you conveniently just NOPE at everything that goes against it. That's not how this works.
Oh, also, remember the time when the Canadian woman who organised the freedom protests was arrested? You literally said that if she ever gets let out, it proves she was a fake and a plant?
Now you will deny shit and claim I am LYING about you, because of some minuscule detail (like when you claimed Ukrainian refugee women are assassins sent by Lithuania and I remembered Luxemburg, so therefore I'm maliciously lying and you are right), so I'm not sure what's the point, but at least we all remember the lunacy.
Any excuse to defend women though. Transgender is a war on women, despite being promoted, financially supported and defended by women's groups.
You can't keep your stories straight. Your earlier excuse for being soft on troonery was that it is a threat to "women's privileges". Now your recognize that it's indeed feminists who are pushing this.
the idea that they are deserting their biological sex out of desperation to avoid constant hatred from women is not even acknowledged.
No, boys do so because they believed your stories about 'female privilege'. Girls escape their biological sex to escape constant leering and rape from men.
See? That's the nice thing about your argument by assertions: since you never provide any evidence, I can just turn them around with no evidence.
What did she achieve other than give "She-covery" Trudeau an excuse to flex his power?
If she's unsuccessful, you'll say this. If she had been successful, you'd say: SEE, SHE SUCCEEDED BECAUSE CANADA IS AT THE COMMAND OF WOMEN!
An Impy in a parallel universe is railing at her because she opposes vaccine mandates against a disease that kills mostly men.
What I said was that Ukraine was covering up their murder statistics to help them get taken into other countries.
That would be even weirder.
Speaking of that, after taking in hundreds of thousands of draft dodging parasites, Hungary got called out as a traitor by Ukraine and Von Der Leyen
You mean GYNgary, the country that taxes SINGLE MEN in order to give extra benefits to FAMILIES (= cucks + draft-dodging parasites)?
I guess they forgot how Hungary co-operated with sending the men fleeing women's war back to Ukraine, against all human rights law.
In another parallel universe, you are a beloved stand-up comedian.
Top post on the entirety of Reddit yesterday (2 days ago?) was a call to violence against men from a women's sub with over 10M followers.
Link the top post. I suspect that you have very good reason to not link it. You don't think that I would have challenged you if I didn't know exactly what you were talking about, do you?
But that's absurd. My points actually make sense.
"I am right and they is wrong."
Yes, great arguments, as usual.
Nobody believes in female privilege except for people who have done the necessary research. "male privilege" is all over the news, mentioned in popular entertainment and part of the school curriculum.
Nobody believes in female privilege except those who make consistently wrong predictions, lending great credence to their other claims.
No, I wouldn't have. I would have cautiously showed gratitude to her, but remembered how many female conservatives have betrayed those who backed them.
The most fascinating thing about you is that you manage to make human universals, like being untrustworthy as a politician or activist, about gender. Almost as if you are taking lessons from feminists.
It isn't that weird. If you have people you want out of a warzone, you'd lie about how good they'd be for their host countries.
I have no idea what the hell you're even talking about - probably because you made it up or confabulated it.
I'm under no illusion that Hungary is our ally.
Who is this 'we' and 'our' you talk about? Is there any country that agrees with you that "women are the enemy"? Hell, can you name 10 people who do?
Nah, I'd be canceled.
No, people would take it as a joke. Besides, you assured me that if you could get 6 minutes of airtime on TV, you would persuade 70% of people to hate women like you.
Good article, shit take. There have been an explosion of "xxx thwarts mass shooting" articles, likely from both copycats due to the media coverage on Texas as well as some hyperbole.
OBVIOUSLY, like and probably in consultation with Kim Potter, she saw an opportunity to kill a man as the first step towards The Genocide. One down, 4 billion to go! Great progress!
"Women are responsible enough to handle guns, they should be the only people armed."
I'll note that as one of your predictions, along with your six incorrect ones about Kim Potter, your 'male curfew' panic and your claim that the ECB would force states to adopt a vaccine mandate. I'm sure it'll come try any moment.
I remember when there was a law attempted that would allow any woman who ever had a romantic relationship with the applicant for a gun license to veto it.
Seems like one of your wild fantasies. How exactly would they know who were your previous relationship partners to begin with, in order to go ask them?
Huh, that is rather bizarre. Not even because of the rights violation, but because of the privacy implications. But maybe that is just my European mentality.
I did see this:
Conjugal partner includes spouses and common law partners and all other persons with whom you live or have lived in a similar relationship within the last 2 years
This is a little less sweeping than I thought.
Anyway, I do think Impy was wrong, because this is not exactly a 'veto right'. You'd have to actually demonstrate stuff. Also, this would be 100% unconstitutional in the US and A.
There is no way a single individual woman could ever do anything good, it must be part of some borg bullshit, because you just hate us all so much you can't even imagine the possibility of ANY woman EVER doing anything.
It's much more likely that every single case of a woman being good was part of some massive conspiracy that does everything.
This also ties in to you also claiming every instance of something bad happening to a woman is a false flag. Aaaand also into the fact that every pedo/lunatic troon is also a feminist false flag.
You always say your paranoid visions are totes mcgoats right and "all the pieces are there", but you conveniently just NOPE at everything that goes against it. That's not how this works.
Oh, also, remember the time when the Canadian woman who organised the freedom protests was arrested? You literally said that if she ever gets let out, it proves she was a fake and a plant?
Now you will deny shit and claim I am LYING about you, because of some minuscule detail (like when you claimed Ukrainian refugee women are assassins sent by Lithuania and I remembered Luxemburg, so therefore I'm maliciously lying and you are right), so I'm not sure what's the point, but at least we all remember the lunacy.
You, of all people? What an incredible idea!
You can't keep your stories straight. Your earlier excuse for being soft on troonery was that it is a threat to "women's privileges". Now your recognize that it's indeed feminists who are pushing this.
No, boys do so because they believed your stories about 'female privilege'. Girls escape their biological sex to escape constant leering and rape from men.
See? That's the nice thing about your argument by assertions: since you never provide any evidence, I can just turn them around with no evidence.
If she's unsuccessful, you'll say this. If she had been successful, you'd say: SEE, SHE SUCCEEDED BECAUSE CANADA IS AT THE COMMAND OF WOMEN!
An Impy in a parallel universe is railing at her because she opposes vaccine mandates against a disease that kills mostly men.
That would be even weirder.
You mean GYNgary, the country that taxes SINGLE MEN in order to give extra benefits to FAMILIES (= cucks + draft-dodging parasites)?
In another parallel universe, you are a beloved stand-up comedian.
Link the top post. I suspect that you have very good reason to not link it. You don't think that I would have challenged you if I didn't know exactly what you were talking about, do you?
"I am right and they is wrong."
Yes, great arguments, as usual.
Nobody believes in female privilege except those who make consistently wrong predictions, lending great credence to their other claims.
The most fascinating thing about you is that you manage to make human universals, like being untrustworthy as a politician or activist, about gender. Almost as if you are taking lessons from feminists.
I have no idea what the hell you're even talking about - probably because you made it up or confabulated it.
Who is this 'we' and 'our' you talk about? Is there any country that agrees with you that "women are the enemy"? Hell, can you name 10 people who do?
No, people would take it as a joke. Besides, you assured me that if you could get 6 minutes of airtime on TV, you would persuade 70% of people to hate women like you.
tl;dr
You asked for that being flippant about it yourself.
Good article, shit take. There have been an explosion of "xxx thwarts mass shooting" articles, likely from both copycats due to the media coverage on Texas as well as some hyperbole.
OBVIOUSLY, like and probably in consultation with Kim Potter, she saw an opportunity to kill a man as the first step towards The Genocide. One down, 4 billion to go! Great progress!
If only schools were staffed by mostly women, shooters would never dare come near them.
Enlighten us.
I'll note that as one of your predictions, along with your six incorrect ones about Kim Potter, your 'male curfew' panic and your claim that the ECB would force states to adopt a vaccine mandate. I'm sure it'll come try any moment.
Seems like one of your wild fantasies. How exactly would they know who were your previous relationship partners to begin with, in order to go ask them?
Why?
So a sort of background check? Never had one, but I would find it bizarre to have to disclose previous relationships to the government.
Huh, that is rather bizarre. Not even because of the rights violation, but because of the privacy implications. But maybe that is just my European mentality.
I did see this:
This is a little less sweeping than I thought.
Anyway, I do think Impy was wrong, because this is not exactly a 'veto right'. You'd have to actually demonstrate stuff. Also, this would be 100% unconstitutional in the US and A.
Please substantiate this.
What kind of 'false flag'?
That was in Canada. And even there, not exactly what you claimed.
How shocked are you that mass shooters, like nearly all criminals, were not innocent lambs before their most recent crime?