Why should people have to pay for the decisions of others? If you want to jump into the meat grinder, go ahead, but I'm not bailing you out when it inevitably goes wrong.
Why would they do that? They'd just have it changed to unmarried men and do the Heil Hitler with their stormcuck allies.
Paying people to put up with how awfully women treat them is an interesting way to get around the actual issue.
Married men are happier, but feel free to claim that this is what they say out of fear that their wives will KILL them.
Supporting things that harm them, but harm us more, is something they've done before.
So women are fine with it, and married men benefit from it... what exactly is stopping this? Of course, feminists are not fine with it, you just want to falsely claim not to be on the same side as they are.
You're the mirror image of the media's "world ends, minorities worst affected".
Actually, it's because those studies include 70 year old boomers who know no other life.
Because it would be an open and obvious declaration of war against single men. It would make everyone examine their actions prior far more closely. They have to get someone else to push it - enter Elon Musk and the birth rate "crisis".
Actually, it's because those studies include 70 year old boomers who know no other life.
Obviously, the comparison is made with people who are similarly situated. Though I assume that it will be hard to correct all factors that distinguish a married man from a rage-filled incel.
Because it would be an open and obvious declaration of war against single men.
I'm all for it. They should be paying their fair share.
They have to get someone else to push it - enter Elon Musk and the birth rate "crisis".
It’s more basic than that. Children tend to come out of marriages and for nations to continue they need to continue to have citizens. Nations used to tax things they wanted to discourage. Now they tax everything. And if women were common in the workforce during this time period they would have been taxed too. This was a society and economy that was fueled off of single income families. It’s no different than modern day tax credits for children.
Tax breaks for families I can approve of, because levied taxes rarely, if ever, go to where they are supposed to and are almost never used properly if they get there. This, fuck this. It's hard enough making it.
Married couples have children, children give people a stake in the future. They are either retarded or they start making decisions on a longer timescale which is good for everyone..
Only dirty commies want to separate the chain of ancestry so they can live in a perpetual year zero. In their fruitopia the revolution is the only standard of value under which every decision is weighed.
You're downvoted ,but this is just socialism. I don't see why this surprises anyone. National Socialists are socialists. I'm sure "Stormcucks" realize that.
Because as Domitius put it, these stormcucks want to dress with the image of being right wing and not socialists. But as soon as you take that clothing you see them for who they truly are. And they do not like it when we notice that on them. You can see how they get triggered when we point it out, and how most or all their insults and talking points are projections.
You don't need to be a "Stormcuck" to see the wisdom of this.
But again, you're getting mad at things feminists get mad about. If this were proposed, it is feminists who would fight against it, alongside you.
Women & Impy: Allies Forever.
Why should people have to pay for the decisions of others? If you want to jump into the meat grinder, go ahead, but I'm not bailing you out when it inevitably goes wrong.
Why would they do that? They'd just have it changed to unmarried men and do the Heil Hitler with their stormcuck allies.
Some things have positive externalities, meaning they benefit society as a whole. If you do not have enough of that, then it should be rewarded.
And if "they" are not almighty as they are in your fantasies? Are they going to support a tax on all unmarrieds, or will they oppose it like you do?
Is it just me, or are you a tad bit crazier of late? Hard to tell, to be honest.
Paying people to put up with how awfully women treat them is an interesting way to get around the actual issue.
Supporting things that harm them, but harm us more, is something they've done before.
Married men are happier, but feel free to claim that this is what they say out of fear that their wives will KILL them.
So women are fine with it, and married men benefit from it... what exactly is stopping this? Of course, feminists are not fine with it, you just want to falsely claim not to be on the same side as they are.
You're the mirror image of the media's "world ends, minorities worst affected".
Actually, it's because those studies include 70 year old boomers who know no other life.
Because it would be an open and obvious declaration of war against single men. It would make everyone examine their actions prior far more closely. They have to get someone else to push it - enter Elon Musk and the birth rate "crisis".
Obviously, the comparison is made with people who are similarly situated. Though I assume that it will be hard to correct all factors that distinguish a married man from a rage-filled incel.
I'm all for it. They should be paying their fair share.
Oh right, how could I not have seen that.
Being part of a community, you take care of eachother.
It’s more basic than that. Children tend to come out of marriages and for nations to continue they need to continue to have citizens. Nations used to tax things they wanted to discourage. Now they tax everything. And if women were common in the workforce during this time period they would have been taxed too. This was a society and economy that was fueled off of single income families. It’s no different than modern day tax credits for children.
A community? What the fuck kind of bullshit is that? They're just random people I don't know, holding me at gunpoint for my resources.
Wow. I feel sorry for you that you've never experienced being part of a loving community.
There's no such thing. It just shows how much tradcons live in a fantasy land.
You're an atheist right?
As I'm so strongly opposed to marriage, can I even be religious?
Prominent atheists are such woman-worshipping cuckolds though.
This was done to promote more babies being born. Everyone pays in a bit for the future. It's a great system.
I don't feel like shaking your hand.
Attacking the source instead of talking about the message. Straight out of the commie handbook.
This is unironically a great idea, and is something that should be instituted once the mass deportations begin in earnest.
Mass deportations of whom?
Non Americans, who else?
Blacks, Jews, I don't know who you don't like.
Though I guess it depends on whether you define them as non-Americans if they are citizens.
Deporting illegals is just common sense.
Over my dead body.
Then you'll die I suppose.
My relatives killed stormcucks during the war, I'm sure I could do the same.
If the choice is death or marriage, then I'd rather be dead anyway.
This might surprise you, but most people's relatives were in world war 2.
American pass time is pwning socialists.
Your relatives also pro-created, unfortunately for the rest of us.
Tax breaks for families I can approve of, because levied taxes rarely, if ever, go to where they are supposed to and are almost never used properly if they get there. This, fuck this. It's hard enough making it.
That would be the general idea. The government take less. I know, stupid fucking idea, but...
Sounds like a good idea.
Married couples have children, children give people a stake in the future. They are either retarded or they start making decisions on a longer timescale which is good for everyone..
Only dirty commies want to separate the chain of ancestry so they can live in a perpetual year zero. In their fruitopia the revolution is the only standard of value under which every decision is weighed.
https://archive.ph/5SxrP
Socialists loves to confiscate your property for their own.
Leftists, same shit, different bag.
yeah instead of doing this, they should have been giving billions of dollars a year to Israel like America does now. MIGA
It's only "socialism" when you spend tax money on gentiles.
What does this have anything to do with Israel? And the land that Israel is, was part of England back then.
Seriously, are you retarded? What do you have against Jews? They never did anything wrong to you.
You reaction to this is evidence that you don't like it when we notice how leftist you are.
You're downvoted ,but this is just socialism. I don't see why this surprises anyone. National Socialists are socialists. I'm sure "Stormcucks" realize that.
Because as Domitius put it, these stormcucks want to dress with the image of being right wing and not socialists. But as soon as you take that clothing you see them for who they truly are. And they do not like it when we notice that on them. You can see how they get triggered when we point it out, and how most or all their insults and talking points are projections.