Why should people have to pay for the decisions of others? If you want to jump into the meat grinder, go ahead, but I'm not bailing you out when it inevitably goes wrong.
Why would they do that? They'd just have it changed to unmarried men and do the Heil Hitler with their stormcuck allies.
Paying people to put up with how awfully women treat them is an interesting way to get around the actual issue.
Married men are happier, but feel free to claim that this is what they say out of fear that their wives will KILL them.
Supporting things that harm them, but harm us more, is something they've done before.
So women are fine with it, and married men benefit from it... what exactly is stopping this? Of course, feminists are not fine with it, you just want to falsely claim not to be on the same side as they are.
You're the mirror image of the media's "world ends, minorities worst affected".
Actually, it's because those studies include 70 year old boomers who know no other life.
Because it would be an open and obvious declaration of war against single men. It would make everyone examine their actions prior far more closely. They have to get someone else to push it - enter Elon Musk and the birth rate "crisis".
It’s more basic than that. Children tend to come out of marriages and for nations to continue they need to continue to have citizens. Nations used to tax things they wanted to discourage. Now they tax everything. And if women were common in the workforce during this time period they would have been taxed too. This was a society and economy that was fueled off of single income families. It’s no different than modern day tax credits for children.
Why should people have to pay for the decisions of others? If you want to jump into the meat grinder, go ahead, but I'm not bailing you out when it inevitably goes wrong.
Why would they do that? They'd just have it changed to unmarried men and do the Heil Hitler with their stormcuck allies.
Some things have positive externalities, meaning they benefit society as a whole. If you do not have enough of that, then it should be rewarded.
And if "they" are not almighty as they are in your fantasies? Are they going to support a tax on all unmarrieds, or will they oppose it like you do?
Is it just me, or are you a tad bit crazier of late? Hard to tell, to be honest.
Paying people to put up with how awfully women treat them is an interesting way to get around the actual issue.
Supporting things that harm them, but harm us more, is something they've done before.
Married men are happier, but feel free to claim that this is what they say out of fear that their wives will KILL them.
So women are fine with it, and married men benefit from it... what exactly is stopping this? Of course, feminists are not fine with it, you just want to falsely claim not to be on the same side as they are.
You're the mirror image of the media's "world ends, minorities worst affected".
Actually, it's because those studies include 70 year old boomers who know no other life.
Because it would be an open and obvious declaration of war against single men. It would make everyone examine their actions prior far more closely. They have to get someone else to push it - enter Elon Musk and the birth rate "crisis".
Being part of a community, you take care of eachother.
It’s more basic than that. Children tend to come out of marriages and for nations to continue they need to continue to have citizens. Nations used to tax things they wanted to discourage. Now they tax everything. And if women were common in the workforce during this time period they would have been taxed too. This was a society and economy that was fueled off of single income families. It’s no different than modern day tax credits for children.
A community? What the fuck kind of bullshit is that? They're just random people I don't know, holding me at gunpoint for my resources.
Wow. I feel sorry for you that you've never experienced being part of a loving community.
There's no such thing. It just shows how much tradcons live in a fantasy land.