The prestigiousness of an award is typically based on who and for what they were awarded it for. Keep awarding con artist for crap work and you devalue the award.
Western AAA gaming is at one of its lowest points because developers listened to people like her over the people who actually made them big in the first place (people like us). She sure "won," but only because that truly was her goal when she tries to claim otherwise.
Peabody and Sherman has had more credibility than this hack award for a long time. This is just feminists who have taken over a dead medium trying to bestow some of the prestige that it once held upon one of their own in an attempt to make both of them relevant once again. It did not.
The idea that she was ever a gamer girl is still very much up for debate
Anita is literally on video telling a room full of people that she's not a gamer and she had learn a lot about videogames to produce a video that is literally just shot after shot of the most popular characters in games. That's not 'learning a lot about videogames', that's just something anyone who paid any attention to the medium at all would just know automatically.
She is also on record, years later, after she had fallen from relevance, It was never about video games'.
It was always about being one of the pseudo-intellectual Marxist agitators that Bezmenov warned you about.
This woman give way too much credit to Anita's integrity, and doesn't understand Anita's marxist revolutionary agenda.
Modern-day awards are not rewards for good work, but ways of making it impossible to challenge bad work.
The prestigiousness of an award is typically based on who and for what they were awarded it for. Keep awarding con artist for crap work and you devalue the award.
There's an argument to be made that awards never had any merit to them.
She slammed right into that wall
Then ate it.
The wall hit her a looooong time ago.
Awards committees are a great example of subversion. The problem is the job is to lame anyone who isnt worthless has better things to do.
Even gatekeeping is still work so productive people dont want to bother with the fights.
Western AAA gaming is at one of its lowest points because developers listened to people like her over the people who actually made them big in the first place (people like us). She sure "won," but only because that truly was her goal when she tries to claim otherwise.
Peabody and Sherman has had more credibility than this hack award for a long time. This is just feminists who have taken over a dead medium trying to bestow some of the prestige that it once held upon one of their own in an attempt to make both of them relevant once again. It did not.
Anita is literally on video telling a room full of people that she's not a gamer and she had learn a lot about videogames to produce a video that is literally just shot after shot of the most popular characters in games. That's not 'learning a lot about videogames', that's just something anyone who paid any attention to the medium at all would just know automatically.
She is also on record, years later, after she had fallen from relevance, It was never about video games'.
It was always about being one of the pseudo-intellectual Marxist agitators that Bezmenov warned you about.
This woman give way too much credit to Anita's integrity, and doesn't understand Anita's marxist revolutionary agenda.
Thicc Lauren Chen > > > > >
Sarkeesian comes across as shallow, preachy and unlikeable. Seems like she fits right in with the Inner Party. I don't get it or like it.
On the plus side, when did Roaming win the Melonsbody award? Phwoar!
Sarko wearing so much "gender signifiers" as always. A walking breathing trope vs women.