(My old flair is more prescient with each passing day)
So, I defeated a DIE initiative at work through, and I think it's easy enough to replicate.
Here's the list of objectives:
- Build managerial rapport
- Educate to create a foundation for objection
- Enact broken windows policing
- Multi-directional Memetic attacks on Leftism
- Convert your enemy
I'm not saying that this will work in all of your situations, but I think that this is an excellent ground game. It's taken me about 6 months of subtle and off-and-on maneuvers, but the more subtle the efforts the more resilience to subversion you are building up.
Step 1: Build managerial rapport
I have a comfortable relationship with my supervisor. He knows I support him well as a subordinate, and he can trust me with problems. He trusts me and my decision making. That's the start. I didn't hide my red-pilling, but I kept my power level low. I've openly said I don't tell people to go to college, and I don't want to engage in the debt-based monetary system. I'm not ranting about politics at work. I'm a partisan, but I'm not a zealot. Moreover, I'm a partisan who announces his own bias when he has one. I explicitly told my manager, "you'll hear from me well ahead of time if I have serious objections. I'll literally tell you about Red Flags." I told him one of my Red Flags was racism.
Step 2: Educate a foundation for objection
That was well over a year ago. I told him, maybe 6 months ago, during monthly counseling that I had to fly a red flag because I heard some rhetoric that could become a problem. Basically a new sub-manager made a comment about the need for diversity and inclusion. HR explicitly said they wanted us to register our race in our payroll system. The HR department literally pushed communist memes (you know the one with the baseball field, but this one was equality-equity-abolition). I work with middle-class normies. They have no idea how serious the threat is, but you can't just start screaming about Cultural Marxism. I mentioned only that I was nervous about racial registration. Make up good buzzwords, you know they do. About 3 months ago, the sub-manager brought up the importance of the race of the new hires. Everyone else responded with the normal "It doesn't matter what color they are as long as they do the work." I brought it up to the manager to say the same, but to also introduce a short and unbiased history lesson about the differences between the Malcolm X and MLK branches of the Civil Rights Movement. The sub-manager was not saying "default liberal" rhetoric, so I explained where that rhetoric would have originated historically. I focused on making my objection not political: "It's not my place to deal with people's ideas. I'd just like you to keep your eye on it because it could hurt the cohesion of the team".
Step 3: Enact broken windows policing
If you don't confront minor shit when it happens, you won't be able to confront the major shit when it falls on your neck. Take subtle opportunities, not to inject politics, but to explain your philosophy or position. When the sub-manager says, "we need to focus on diversity", you say "I don't care as long as they can do the work." If they say "we should do pronouns in the bio", you say "I don't mind if they guess when they call me." If they say, "We should have a Universal Basic Income", you say, "I'd rather have a job to sell my work experience." Don't argue, just state your case, and let them take the bait. Offer up the chance for them to attack you like a lunatic over a personal opinion that is utterly unoffensive. Remember, don't do this at the last minute. You should be doing this whenever the topic of conversation comes up. Just like you might offer up your favorite food in small talk. If the small talk becomes political, make your private political position identifiable. And remember, don't let it go further than small talk unless it's someone on our side who wants to dive in. Just keep it small talk and that will be enough to prevent Leftist subversives from claiming they have hegemony.
Step 4: Multi-directional Memetic attacks on Leftism
"Everyone is diverse." I heard my department head use that phrase and holy shit is that smart. I'm preaching to the choir if I start talking about the need to oppose diversity, inclusion, and equity. However, the real world ain't the fuckin' choir. Let's establish some baselines for using memes as a weapon to undermine a Leftist objective. Run individualism as a counter to Leftist collectivism: when they want to talk about groups, focus on talking about the individuals instead. Run uniqueness as a counter to diversity: Each individual is unique, therefore each individual is diverse. See the previous point. Run professional collectivism to counter Leftist balkanization: point out professional teamwork can be undermined by identity politics. Run professional exclusion as a counter to Leftist inclusion: some things shouldn't be included because they are inappropriate or unprofessional. Run moral inclusion to counter Leftist exclusion: it's morally unacceptable to previously claim inclusion, only to turn around and say 'das racist'.
That last one is a fucking death-knell, because that fucked the sub-manager up so bad she asked if we should do a White History Month... as part of her Black History Month agenda.
Force them to be totally inclusive, then turn around and complain that their inclusion was unprofessional or immoral.
... technically that counts as crying out when I ask them to strike me but fuck you it works.
Step 5: Convert your enemy.
"I know it was you who objected to Black History Month." I don't think I'm ever gonna forget that phone call.
I didn't by the way. I objected to the fact that "increased intentionality on heritage" would lead to racial division within the team. Especially when someone who was your classic 60% German, 30% Polish, 5% Scandinavian, 4% Czech, 1% Native American was told: "No, you gotta pick one." I never said we shouldn't do Black History Month... we just didn't. Meh, that's what you get for Juneteenth and all the other fake holidays like Kwanza :p
And no, that wasn't what the call was about, it was something else, the sub-manager had just been holding that in for a while. And that's actually the point. Most of the Useful Idiots on the Left are held there by "politics" that is nothing more than a rationalization of their own emotional problems. That's really what radicalization is. As we spoke through the call, what became obvious (as the sub-manager was venting) was that they were insecure. So, I focused on being affable enough to set them at ease, and gave them confidence that I wasn't undermining their authority. (I was undermining their political objectives, but I didn't say that). And yes, I did take that to their manager. I didn't do it in a demeaning or punitive way. I did that intentionally as way of improving the sub-manager's emotional resilience. I specifically told the lead manager that I think the sub-manager may have felt stressed and insecure of their own authority, and that might need to be a focus on helping them gain more self-confidence.
And no, I do actually mean that. Emotional stoicism, financial stability, maturity, responsibility, discipline, all of these basic things are fundamentally anti-Leftist because they make people less dependent on the slave mentality that the Left cultivates through emotional abuse. Men become more right wing when they work out because of this. Women become more right wing when they marry men because of this. Men get more right-wing when they become more wealthy and financially secure, or when they get a job, or when they stay out of college, or go to a church, or have children.
Personal growth is one of our strongest and most subversive weapons against Leftism. That sub-manager and I are on mostly good terms (as far as I can tell). I want that sub-manager to grow as a person and become less dependent on Leftist racial collectivism to compensate for their own insecurities.
Is your employer large and/or publicly traded?
I got as far as the site head at my public multinational before I got an answer that amounted to "these policies are set way above my pay grade". Then later on I saw that the stock indices and rating agencies were starting to factor these initiatives into their decisionmaking, which in part explained why the people making those policies were making them.
I am glad you had success; I am merely suggesting that the road to success may be different depending on circumstance.
Yep. Unless you can get a meeting with Larry Fink and convince him to knock this crap off or something like that, you're on borrowed time because your small business will get eaten eventually.
Then take the people without their heads up their ass and start a new company.
Multi-nationals and monopolies are simply communist states in miniature. Why the fuck would you give them the fruits of your labour?
The global financial system must be torn down. You won't out compete globohomo corporations with the current structures in place.
Medium sized, sole owner.
That is absolutely part of my consideration. However, I don't think that this is a problem at my low level. I think it could be replicated even at larger companies within sub-departments.
I think the problem with many of the larger and publicly traded corporations is that they are absolutely using ESG scores to control competitors, and so there have to be performance metrics that can be proven, before you can join the cool kids club at the top.
The public multinational corporations are basically perpetuating it, so there might be little you can do considering the damage of the infection and how serious it is. My strategy isn't going to work at a University, or at Google. Literally no chance. However, I'd bet it's possible to make a departmental impact at something like Cisco or Cargill or American Express. Any company where money is still taken more seriously than politics.
Certainly at smaller companies, these strategies will be that much more effective. If you work at a candlestick factory that has 50 full time employees, this is definitely a strategy you should go with.
That being said, it may also behoove you not to get a job with the OmniCorps.
I agree that people shouldn't work for OmniCorp. I'm currently being reminded of that fact: serves me right for trying to help a friend working at one...
As for whether or not the strategy would work at a department level for one, even our line managers had performance goals linked to "diversity and inclusion" policies. Meaning their bonuses and raises were tied to diversity and inclusion. In the worst case, convincing your boss could mean they aren't your boss anymore. In the best case, you're depriving them of bonuses and raises.
Smaller companies where you've personally talked to the owner about something not work-related, absolutely people should follow your lead.
My company has over 1,000 full time employees, so I really don't think it needs to be that small.
Well...
Smaller, but I do think that should be an objective for a lot of us.
Get out of the Wage Slave OmniCorps, they're going to slit your throat anyways. Smaller companies that offer better growth opportunities (even at less pay) are the winning option.
Agreed. It does highlight you as a target. But it also illuminates you to others who are not necessarily prepared to just go out and say it.
Maintaining your preference both asserts courage of your convictions, and conditions you to the harder fights that come later, but it also doesn't cede any unnecessary ground. Leftists are constantly looking for an avenue of attack, like criminal casing an area. Even walking outside and giving the guy a friendly wave indicates the potential for conflict against their efforts. You don't even need to yell. If they know that you've seen them and what they're up to, they'll look for an easier target.
That's why I mentioned "broken windows policing". You get the small fights in very early, and they don't become bigger fights where you're all by yourself. Every story where someone got lynched by a Leftist lynchmob, normally starts with the Leftist activists making an incredibly aggressive power-move, and some moderate lightly objecting at the last possible moment (like Weinstien at Evergreen, or Damore at Google). By then, it's too late and you get forced out. If anyone had stood up in the previous ten years of activity, it wouldn't have gotten to this point.
I like Michael Malice, but he's dead wrong about how to deal with these people, and it comes form his Soviet upbringing. You duck your head and keep to yourself in the Soviet Union because there's no way to defeat the power structure. These Leftists are more like an American Khmer Rouge. The Monarchists who had been fighting the Khmer were literally forced into the Ocean. They took to boats and were slowly re-settled in Indonesia, Philippines, and the US. The people left in Cambodia... 1/5 were killed in only 5 years or so. You're actually better off losing to them and being driven into the ocean of the unknown, than you are surrendering to them. This is because the real blood letting only starts when you can't leave.
As such, not only do the early confrontations work better to slow their progress, but even if you lose and are fired, you're still better off.
Great post
For those who don't know, there's a whole book on this topic.
Lindsay just wants to return to the 1990s though.
The 90s were a better time for sure, but the seeds of evil were already well planted then. It's extremely naive and pointless to try to "return" to the conditions that created this
Probably worth the purchase to be honest.
👏
Thanks.
This is wise.
Thanks
huh. sounds much less fake and gay than I first suspected from the title.
I'm glad that I proved it enough.
Good on you. Glad it worked out.
Thanks
No problem. It's good to hear something positive for a change. I am definitely going to use this advice for my current situation.