Feminists are human . . . but they have forgotten what it means to be one. And for sure they are irredeemable and worthy only of ridicule because, for sure, they can't be "fixed." Anyway, if they could be, they wouldn't be worth the effort. They as a collective have too much to answer for, having been the tip of the ideological spear that's up our collective ass at the moment.
No see, here's the thing: men can save civilization by The Taming Of The Shrews.
Many of the Leftist slags are just women who have been abused by Leftism, and are looking honestly for strong masculine presences in their lives because they are heterosexual women that are naturally attracted to masculinity.
Modern western women have been so deprived of strong, confident, male role models that they are basically falling head over heels for the first male that will put a boot on their neck. They are, quite literally, pathologized into being attracted to toxic masculinity, because they have been deprived of normal masculinity.
I firmly believe this explains the "Cuomosexuals" and American women's extraordinary fetish of rape porn and sexual violence according to their own pornographic consumption data.
These women actually want to be tradwives, but they don't know how to ask for it, they don't know men that can give them that, and they have an ideology built into their own brains to suppress any such normal desires. This is because Feminists understand neither men NOR women.
Some of them, absolutely. You just have to tell the difference between the Useful Idiots and the Predators.
The Useful Idiots are absolutely victims. They barely even understand the world outside their abuse circle. They are the people who will unironically tell you that BLM protests were never as violent as January 6th.
Women do want to be saved, that's a major part of their psyche thanks to the way that their sexual capital works. Women basically start at the most attractive and valuable they will ever be, so they are always declining in value. Pair-bonding with strong, high-status men, allows them to form families and communities which allows the to repair that lost social value, and possibly increase it, only with the help of a man.
From a male perspective, holy shit that fucking sucks because their primary goal can't be building themselves up. Instead, it has to be keeping themselves from becoming worthless.
Feminists are particularly people who want to be saved, and it's why they've resorted to a political pathology to fix the fact that they are broken, while feminism continues to break them even more. Now, that doesn't mean you stick your dick in crazy. Some women are just going to have to be let go. What it does mean is that there are many women who aren't ideologically possessed, are are just repeating a mantra because they think it has value. They have no loyalty to Feminism, because their primary concern is themselves. A good man is a huge boon to them, and Feminism can't supplant that, so they start to break away.
I've actually had former feminist women tell me this. Their politics changed when they got a boyfriend. It wasn't obvious to them that this was the case, but they quickly started to realize they didn't need to care, or be obsessed, with the ridiculous drama of their political circles. Then their political circles started to turn on them, and claim that their boyfriend was trying to brainwash them, trick them, or make them submit to the patriarchy. In all the examples I got, the boyfriends were just apolitical normies. However, the utility of a decent apolitical man far outweighs the feminist sisterhood to the vast majority of women.
It makes plenty of sense when you think about it since men are effectively personal super-soldiers for women that pair-bond to them. No group of feminist harpies could be as useful or responsive as to a woman as one committed man.
temporal paradox
It's good to see soothsaying coming back into vogue. None of this tarot bullshit. Just tell the future like it is.
Feminists are human . . . but they have forgotten what it means to be one. And for sure they are irredeemable and worthy only of ridicule because, for sure, they can't be "fixed." Anyway, if they could be, they wouldn't be worth the effort. They as a collective have too much to answer for, having been the tip of the ideological spear that's up our collective ass at the moment.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: It doesn't cross the line, but it's getting a little close to the sun in regards to Rule 2.
It's the dehumanization aspect. I agree with you on Communists in the same way, but it's a fine line that we have to avoid crossing.
Believe it or not, you can't win a war using the enemy's strategy. That's why it's their strategy.
No see, here's the thing: men can save civilization by The Taming Of The Shrews.
Many of the Leftist slags are just women who have been abused by Leftism, and are looking honestly for strong masculine presences in their lives because they are heterosexual women that are naturally attracted to masculinity.
Modern western women have been so deprived of strong, confident, male role models that they are basically falling head over heels for the first male that will put a boot on their neck. They are, quite literally, pathologized into being attracted to toxic masculinity, because they have been deprived of normal masculinity.
I firmly believe this explains the "Cuomosexuals" and American women's extraordinary fetish of rape porn and sexual violence according to their own pornographic consumption data.
These women actually want to be tradwives, but they don't know how to ask for it, they don't know men that can give them that, and they have an ideology built into their own brains to suppress any such normal desires. This is because Feminists understand neither men NOR women.
Some of them, absolutely. You just have to tell the difference between the Useful Idiots and the Predators.
The Useful Idiots are absolutely victims. They barely even understand the world outside their abuse circle. They are the people who will unironically tell you that BLM protests were never as violent as January 6th.
Women do want to be saved, that's a major part of their psyche thanks to the way that their sexual capital works. Women basically start at the most attractive and valuable they will ever be, so they are always declining in value. Pair-bonding with strong, high-status men, allows them to form families and communities which allows the to repair that lost social value, and possibly increase it, only with the help of a man.
From a male perspective, holy shit that fucking sucks because their primary goal can't be building themselves up. Instead, it has to be keeping themselves from becoming worthless.
Feminists are particularly people who want to be saved, and it's why they've resorted to a political pathology to fix the fact that they are broken, while feminism continues to break them even more. Now, that doesn't mean you stick your dick in crazy. Some women are just going to have to be let go. What it does mean is that there are many women who aren't ideologically possessed, are are just repeating a mantra because they think it has value. They have no loyalty to Feminism, because their primary concern is themselves. A good man is a huge boon to them, and Feminism can't supplant that, so they start to break away.
I've actually had former feminist women tell me this. Their politics changed when they got a boyfriend. It wasn't obvious to them that this was the case, but they quickly started to realize they didn't need to care, or be obsessed, with the ridiculous drama of their political circles. Then their political circles started to turn on them, and claim that their boyfriend was trying to brainwash them, trick them, or make them submit to the patriarchy. In all the examples I got, the boyfriends were just apolitical normies. However, the utility of a decent apolitical man far outweighs the feminist sisterhood to the vast majority of women.
It makes plenty of sense when you think about it since men are effectively personal super-soldiers for women that pair-bond to them. No group of feminist harpies could be as useful or responsive as to a woman as one committed man.
Look again. At the lapel. That's a tranny.