Some of them, absolutely. You just have to tell the difference between the Useful Idiots and the Predators.
The Useful Idiots are absolutely victims. They barely even understand the world outside their abuse circle. They are the people who will unironically tell you that BLM protests were never as violent as January 6th.
Women do want to be saved, that's a major part of their psyche thanks to the way that their sexual capital works. Women basically start at the most attractive and valuable they will ever be, so they are always declining in value. Pair-bonding with strong, high-status men, allows them to form families and communities which allows the to repair that lost social value, and possibly increase it, only with the help of a man.
From a male perspective, holy shit that fucking sucks because their primary goal can't be building themselves up. Instead, it has to be keeping themselves from becoming worthless.
Feminists are particularly people who want to be saved, and it's why they've resorted to a political pathology to fix the fact that they are broken, while feminism continues to break them even more. Now, that doesn't mean you stick your dick in crazy. Some women are just going to have to be let go. What it does mean is that there are many women who aren't ideologically possessed, are are just repeating a mantra because they think it has value. They have no loyalty to Feminism, because their primary concern is themselves. A good man is a huge boon to them, and Feminism can't supplant that, so they start to break away.
I've actually had former feminist women tell me this. Their politics changed when they got a boyfriend. It wasn't obvious to them that this was the case, but they quickly started to realize they didn't need to care, or be obsessed, with the ridiculous drama of their political circles. Then their political circles started to turn on them, and claim that their boyfriend was trying to brainwash them, trick them, or make them submit to the patriarchy. In all the examples I got, the boyfriends were just apolitical normies. However, the utility of a decent apolitical man far outweighs the feminist sisterhood to the vast majority of women.
It makes plenty of sense when you think about it since men are effectively personal super-soldiers for women that pair-bond to them. No group of feminist harpies could be as useful or responsive as to a woman as one committed man.
Some of them, absolutely. You just have to tell the difference between the Useful Idiots and the Predators.
The Useful Idiots are absolutely victims. They barely even understand the world outside their abuse circle. They are the people who will unironically tell you that BLM protests were never as violent as January 6th.
Women do want to be saved, that's a major part of their psyche thanks to the way that their sexual capital works. Women basically start at the most attractive and valuable they will ever be, so they are always declining in value. Pair-bonding with strong, high-status men, allows them to form families and communities which allows the to repair that lost social value, and possibly increase it, only with the help of a man.
From a male perspective, holy shit that fucking sucks because their primary goal can't be building themselves up. Instead, it has to be keeping themselves from becoming worthless.
Feminists are particularly people who want to be saved, and it's why they've resorted to a political pathology to fix the fact that they are broken, while feminism continues to break them even more. Now, that doesn't mean you stick your dick in crazy. Some women are just going to have to be let go. What it does mean is that there are many women who aren't ideologically possessed, are are just repeating a mantra because they think it has value. They have no loyalty to Feminism, because their primary concern is themselves. A good man is a huge boon to them, and Feminism can't supplant that, so they start to break away.
I've actually had former feminist women tell me this. Their politics changed when they got a boyfriend. It wasn't obvious to them that this was the case, but they quickly started to realize they didn't need to care, or be obsessed, with the ridiculous drama of their political circles. Then their political circles started to turn on them, and claim that their boyfriend was trying to brainwash them, trick them, or make them submit to the patriarchy. In all the examples I got, the boyfriends were just apolitical normies. However, the utility of a decent apolitical man far outweighs the feminist sisterhood to the vast majority of women.
It makes plenty of sense when you think about it since men are effectively personal super-soldiers for women that pair-bond to them. No group of feminist harpies could be as useful or responsive as to a woman as one committed man.