I've seen this first hand. There were a couple girls at my field training that couldn't even carry a 30 lbs bag. The guys had to carry the bags in addition to their own. And one of the girls was so weak she couldn't rack the slide on the M9.
My last tour in my 20 year Navy career had a 4'10" 95lb girl that worked in supply. She was willing, but couldn't carry anything over 25 lbs or so, or that was bulky.
If she had to evacuate an average sailor out of a flooding space up a ladder, through a scuttle, there is just no way she has the strength to do it. Same deal with pushing a fire hose down that same scuttle into a burning space, she just can't do it.
She was a liability in nearly every job there was to do when it came to fighting the ship in combat, but, women uber alles and all that. I don't blame her, at least she raised her right hand and put on the uniform, but she just should not have been there.
If the Navy ever gets into a serious fight, we're gonna lose a lot of ships, and the crews with them.
You and u/TheImpossible1 are both wrong, all single women of questionable virginity under the age of 25 should be drafted specifically as comfort women for troops deployed in conflict zones. They have no greater possible contribution to make to their own society nor indeed the civilians of foreign theaters.
No, the idea that this would be a good plan is the retarded part. Regardless of logistics, you don't want people thinking with their dicks, or protecting something worthless because of it.
Thought about continuing these larpy bantz, but seeing as you're seriously considering the logistics, I don't want to accidentally convince you that it's a good idea. Especially if it really is a good idea... I don't want to float stuff that would legitimately improve the American military.
Women's right to vote should have been contingent on registration for the draft. In fact, their voting privilege should be revoked until they're required to register.
I've seen this first hand. There were a couple girls at my field training that couldn't even carry a 30 lbs bag. The guys had to carry the bags in addition to their own. And one of the girls was so weak she couldn't rack the slide on the M9.
My last tour in my 20 year Navy career had a 4'10" 95lb girl that worked in supply. She was willing, but couldn't carry anything over 25 lbs or so, or that was bulky.
If she had to evacuate an average sailor out of a flooding space up a ladder, through a scuttle, there is just no way she has the strength to do it. Same deal with pushing a fire hose down that same scuttle into a burning space, she just can't do it.
She was a liability in nearly every job there was to do when it came to fighting the ship in combat, but, women uber alles and all that. I don't blame her, at least she raised her right hand and put on the uniform, but she just should not have been there.
If the Navy ever gets into a serious fight, we're gonna lose a lot of ships, and the crews with them.
And if you said as much publicly your best case scenario would be demotion and to be put on the shitlist for a long time
Better men die than a woman temporarily feel bad that she can't larp as a sailor.
women don't belong outside of their father or husband's home without an escort
Islam is right about women just like its right about LGBT
islam is looking more and more appealing every day
Even a broken clock is right twice a day..
As long as they vote the way they do they should be forced to serve.
You and u/TheImpossible1 are both wrong, all single women of questionable virginity under the age of 25 should be drafted specifically as comfort women for troops deployed in conflict zones. They have no greater possible contribution to make to their own society nor indeed the civilians of foreign theaters.
That's retarded.
25 too high? I don't think these zogbots should be too spoilt, that's all.
No, the idea that this would be a good plan is the retarded part. Regardless of logistics, you don't want people thinking with their dicks, or protecting something worthless because of it.
Thought about continuing these larpy bantz, but seeing as you're seriously considering the logistics, I don't want to accidentally convince you that it's a good idea. Especially if it really is a good idea... I don't want to float stuff that would legitimately improve the American military.
Nope. Too many STDs, can't be endangering the health of the troops.
They do pretty well in Israel. No reason women can't fill administrative slots, as has been customary.
they bring the advantage of freeing up men to serve as combatants.
They are not frontline troops.
I laughed.
But it doesn't change that I think they should be in the draft.
Women's right to vote should have been contingent on registration for the draft. In fact, their voting privilege should be revoked until they're required to register.